And then there was Hillary

 
Thread Tools
  #46  
Old 06-19-2016, 05:41 AM
Guest
n/a
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Guest View Post
He may be a racist, but he is also a free citizen. So far, Obama's AG has not yet managed to get "hate speech" approved as law. Therefore, he is not breaking the law.

Why is it that liberals can hurl rocks and eggs at anyone that does not agree with them, yet words from the right must be stopped?

Liberals always want to ban anything that they do not approve of. Why not just go away or ignore stuff you don't like? I just ignore him.
Because they think they are better than us. Know better than us. The ultimate hypocrisy.

"Hate speech"? Where was the hate? It's "honest speech", "truth speech". THAT is why they want it banned.
  #47  
Old 06-19-2016, 09:41 AM
Guest
n/a
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Guest View Post
Because they think they are better than us. Know better than us. The ultimate hypocrisy.

"Hate speech"? Where was the hate? It's "honest speech", "truth speech". THAT is why they want it banned.
Hate speech to a liberal is the verbal expression of any opinion or idea that they do not agree with.
  #48  
Old 06-19-2016, 10:01 AM
Guest
n/a
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Guest View Post
Hate speech to a liberal is the verbal expression of any opinion or idea that they do not agree with.
100% correct ....no dispute....no contest....right on the money.....succinct....accurate
  #49  
Old 06-19-2016, 11:16 AM
Guest
n/a
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Guest View Post
Hate speech to a liberal is the verbal expression of any opinion or idea that they do not agree with.
I wouldn't consider your statement to be hate speech because it doesn't offend, threaten or insult me based on my race, color, religion, national origin, sexual orientation, disability or any of my other traits and yet I disagree with it.

It's not a working definition for me or maybe I'm not a liberal.
  #50  
Old 06-19-2016, 12:02 PM
Guest
n/a
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Guest View Post
I wouldn't consider your statement to be hate speech because it doesn't offend, threaten or insult me based on my race, color, religion, national origin, sexual orientation, disability or any of my other traits and yet I disagree with it.

It's not a working definition for me or maybe I'm not a liberal.
Give it time to work itself in, and you will be offended and demand someone be banned.
  #51  
Old 06-19-2016, 12:59 PM
Guest
n/a
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Guest View Post
Give it time to work itself in, and you will be offended and demand someone be banned.
Tell me when you want me to change my mind.
  #52  
Old 06-19-2016, 01:16 PM
Guest
n/a
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Guest View Post
I wouldn't consider your statement to be hate speech because it doesn't offend, threaten or insult me based on my race, color, religion, national origin, sexual orientation, disability or any of my other traits and yet I disagree with it.

It's not a working definition for me or maybe I'm not a liberal.
Yeah, maybe. But, we both know you are.
  #53  
Old 06-19-2016, 01:28 PM
Guest
n/a
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Guest View Post
OH NO not a gay lifestyle, ahh the horror. You really are a moron, "liberals are bigots and against decent people", seriously. By definition Liberals are open to all kinds of people.

Regarding Hillary, I would totally do her, you know she's an animal in bed.
Dear Guest: I 'm going to guess you are trolling. But based on your above-stated comments, if sincere,here is how I wold answer.

You not only do a disservice to liberals, you are also unenlightened about what being a liberal is in today's society.

Somewhere along the line liberals lost their historical memory. They were once pluralistic, rational, universal. They believed in freedom of thought and speech. They distrusted institutional power and believed in goodness of humanity.

Today they act like radical abolitionists, radical egalitarians, utopian socialist and egalitarian anarchists. As such they use coercive methods legal or by shaming to deny people their rights and civil liberties, essentially undermining the rule of law.

To wit the power to restrict free speech on college campuses
via trigger warning micro-aggressions and safe spaces.

In 2014 Rutgers protested Condeleeza Rice because she served during the George bush Administration. Recently Harvard faculty and students protested Jason Riley's invitation but eventually relented

Liberals have become so illiberal they are now eating their own when Scripps College(all female) faculty and students, protested the liberal feminist icon Madeleine Albright who served with Bill Clinton as a war criminal and genocide enabler

Lest let's not forget Black Lives matters and such similar organizations and the war against Christianity.

Today's progressives goal is not truth but power, which is presented in the guise of equality and social justice.


My friend if you too did more reading you might have had an opportunity to read "The Closing of a Liberal Mind" by Kim R. Holmes

Further you would be able to reason that Hillary Clinton, Barrack Obama and Bernie Sanders are pushing a socialist "big" government agenda because they want to enslave people and place them in a subordinated position needing to feed off the government and silence critics who threatened their totalitarian agenda.

Personal Best Regards:
  #54  
Old 06-19-2016, 06:02 PM
Guest
n/a
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Guest View Post
Dear Guest: I 'm going to guess you are trolling. But based on your above-stated comments, if sincere,here is how I wold answer.

You not only do a disservice to liberals, you are also unenlightened about what being a liberal is in today's society.

Somewhere along the line liberals lost their historical memory. They were once pluralistic, rational, universal. They believed in freedom of thought and speech. They distrusted institutional power and believed in goodness of humanity.

Today they act like radical abolitionists, radical egalitarians, utopian socialist and egalitarian anarchists. As such they use coercive methods legal or by shaming to deny people their rights and civil liberties, essentially undermining the rule of law.

To wit the power to restrict free speech on college campuses
via trigger warning micro-aggressions and safe spaces.

In 2014 Rutgers protested Condeleeza Rice because she served during the George bush Administration. Recently Harvard faculty and students protested Jason Riley's invitation but eventually relented

Liberals have become so illiberal they are now eating their own when Scripps College(all female) faculty and students, protested the liberal feminist icon Madeleine Albright who served with Bill Clinton as a war criminal and genocide enabler

Lest let's not forget Black Lives matters and such similar organizations and the war against Christianity.

Today's progressives goal is not truth but power, which is presented in the guise of equality and social justice.


My friend if you too did more reading you might have had an opportunity to read "The Closing of a Liberal Mind" by Kim R. Holmes

Further you would be able to reason that Hillary Clinton, Barrack Obama and Bernie Sanders are pushing a socialist "big" government agenda because they want to enslave people and place them in a subordinated position needing to feed off the government and silence critics who threatened their totalitarian agenda.

Personal Best Regards:
All good points.
  #55  
Old 06-20-2016, 03:39 AM
Guest
n/a
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Guest View Post
All good points.
Thank you. Do you suppose a sufficient number of Democrats will see the light and recognize radical fascist, under the guise of social equality and using totalitarian tactics to suppress citizens constitutional rights have hijacked their party?????????????????

Personal Best Regards:
  #56  
Old 06-20-2016, 03:53 AM
Guest
n/a
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Guest;12***88
Thank you. Do you suppose a sufficient number of Democrats will see the light and recognize radical fascist, under the guise of social equality and using totalitarian tactics to suppress citizens constitutional rights have hijacked their party?????????????????

Personal Best Regards:
NO, I don't. I believe that common sense and logical thinking disappearing. And I believe those traits started to be ostracized more and more in today's left movement. As long as these people are enabled, coddled they will always be dependent on someone else. The days of self-reliance are numbered.
  #57  
Old 06-20-2016, 06:20 AM
Guest
n/a
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Guest;12***93
NO, I don't. I believe that common sense and logical thinking disappearing. And I believe those traits started to be ostracized more and more in today's left movement. As long as these people are enabled, coddled they will always be dependent on someone else. The days of self-reliance are numbered.
They're disappearing because just about EVERYTHING is a lie. When everything is a lie, there is no common sense or logical thinking.

Take equality...one of the big lies. How do you use common sense and logical thinking to explain quotas and affirmative action? How do you explain lowering EVERY standard to get minorities to "qualify"?

As long as the government pays people to live, you'll have NO self reliance. Besides, you have to be "equal" to compete...and they're not...it's proven by way of the NEED to quotas and affirmative action.
 

Tags
told, hillary

Thread Tools

You are viewing a new design of the TOTV site. Click here to revert to the old version.

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:21 PM.