The highlighted issue above has proven to be not a problem in the last two presidential elections or in the current democratic candidates!!

Any of the current republican candidates...ANY ONE....is better qualified and experienced than the incumbent or democratic choices for 2016.

:agree:

For his second election Obama had U.S. Senate and four years Presidential experience. Hillary was a First Lady, U.S. Senator, and Secretary of State. Sanders was a member of the U.S. House of Representatives and is a U.S. senator. Your experience argument shows a little bias, just sayin'.

i watched the debate and recorded the Trump event....feel good that everyone on that panel would make a good leader. would like to see Rubio as VP and still like Trump for pres. agree with previous poster that the coverage of the Trump event was really an opportunity for CNN to get their talking heads commenting with the event in the background. Trump did have time to say that fox had apologized and talked a bit about china and the iran deal while announcing all the big donations for the vets. they did not show the speeches of Santorum or Huckabee but had them on later as more talking heads. i like both of them, also. our conundrum is "who do we pick" among some great choices.

Well chi, interesting that you bring up that point. Even though you are not responding to my comment, I would like to submit my two cents regarding Hillary's so-called experience.

Hillary was first lady. Does that mean that a wife of an astronaut is experienced enough to be a member of our next space launch?

Hillary was a senator. Yes, she produced a total of THREE(3) bills that contributed absolutely nothing. So much for her senate experience.

She was SecState. Exactly what did she accomplish? The world is in worst of a state than before her, so even though I am not accusing her of being the reason, what did she do to make it less so?

Yes, Sanders has experience. But, the commie is not a viable candidate either. He stands absolutely no chance of getting elected, and even the Dems know that. That's why Bloomie is warming up in the pit....in case Killary doesn't make it to the big game.

Obama was a loser and had no job experience, other than a couple of non-productive years in the senate.

Dear Guest: In my view clinton's bona fides or lack thereof are an after thought. te fact is her dealings with foreign governents when she was Sec of State, via clinton foundation, her personal e-mail server national security breach faux pas and lack of leadership regarding Benghazi make her unworthy and unqualifed to be president

Personal Best Regards:

Yes, I totally agree with your statement.

The only safe, true statement about Obama and Clinton is the fact they were taking up space in those positions.

Living in the WH is a qualification to be a presidential candidate.....excuse me one moment....:1rotfl::1rotfl::1rotfl::1rotfl:

If living in the White House is qualification enough, then I bet there are plenty of staff that fit the qualification requirement. Didn't they make a movie about a White House butler recently?