Originally Posted by Guest

Our law says innocent until PROVEN guilty.
BUT-when it comes to RACISM, CHILD ABUSE, SEX you are assumed guilty with the charge and it is impossible to prove you are innocent.

Child protection service is a group gone nuts due to unrestricted power. One of my firends was accused, in a nasty divorce of sexually abusing his daughter. His daughter was inspected by several doctors. He was found innocent. So his daughter was SEXUALLY ABUSED by her mother and child protection services.

It is a laugh now but we had Child Protection Services seize a joint bank account from us in the name of some lady. They wasted a lot of MY time. A bitch from Child Protection Services demanded I send her my social security card. My REPLY-sure you send me yours and I will send you mine. My bank tried to charge me a couple of hundred dollars in legal fees to straighten this out. In the end, the error was due to my bank's error and child protection services. I demanded, that the bank not only made me whold but sent me an apology letter on their stationary signed by their bank president. I also demanded and received an apology letter from child protection services.

O'Reilly is he guilty? Read the posts. The people believe he is. HE HAS NOT BEEN FOUND GUILTY. HE IS RUINED JUST BY THE CHARGE.

Lets be clear.....AT MINIMUM SEVEN CHARGES MAYBE EIGHT. ALL SHUT DOWN WITH HUSH MONEY.

Nobody says he is guilty because nobody knows but BLIND LOYALTY TO A MAN CHARGED WITH WIFE ABUSE AND WORKPLACE HARRASSMENT IS STRANGE.

I might add, this was over FIFTEEN YEARS at least.

So Rockface says hush money indicates guilt...is that what you are saying??

Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-G890A using Tapatalk

Originally Posted by Guest

So Rockface says hush money indicates guilt...is that what you are saying??

Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-G890A using Tapatalk

As you already are aware, or you are completely bezerk, I said..

"Nobody says he is guilty because nobody knows but BLIND LOYALTY TO A MAN CHARGED WITH WIFE ABUSE AND WORKPLACE HARRASSMENT IS STRANGE."

If you need me to use smaller words, let me know.

Originally Posted by Rockface

Lets be clear.....AT MINIMUM SEVEN CHARGES MAYBE EIGHT. ALL SHUT DOWN WITH HUSH MONEY.

What is the significance of this statement?

Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-G890A using Tapatalk

Trump: bragged about his "conquests" was accused by more than a 10 women,( Sexual-Assault Survivors Speak Out Against Trump in New Ad) defended OJ Simpson, Mike Tyson, would barge into Miss Teen USA dressing rooms.

Former Trump Kentucky campaign chair charged with human sex trafficking of a minor.
BUSTED: Trump campaign chair caught in a motel room with an underage boy

O'Reilly cost FOX over $13MILLION to silence accusers of sexual inappropriateness and cost over 70 sponsors to his cable program.

Ailes who was accused and let go from FOX for sexual inappropriateness, and assaults....

Cosby assault victims gave other women the courage to come forward.

Who cares? O'Reilly is gone and the libtards are happy. If that is all it takes to make a libtard happy, I say GREAT! Now, put away your stuffed animals, come out of your safe room, the boogieman is gone. Oops, Trump is still there, better run and hide again. I understand that Obummer is riding to the rescue of your leftwing loser party. Long live socialism, Soros's puppet to the rescue.

Originally Posted by Guest

Who cares? O'Reilly is gone and the libtards are happy. If that is all it takes to make a libtard happy, I say GREAT! Now, put away your stuffed animals, come out of your safe room, the boogieman is gone. Oops, Trump is still there, better run and hide again. I understand that Obummer is riding to the rescue of your leftwing loser party. Long live socialism, Soros's puppet to the rescue.

sounds like you are part of the same flock of sexual deviants

Originally Posted by Guest

sounds like you are part of the same flock of sexual deviants

It appears that you have a reading comprehension problem. But, I expect that from a liberal TROLL.. No substance, just impotent little attacks, hardly worthy of attention. Calling someone a sexual deviant is amusing coming from a member of the LGBTQ community.

Originally Posted by Guest

Lets be clear.....AT MINIMUM SEVEN CHARGES MAYBE EIGHT. ALL SHUT DOWN WITH HUSH MONEY.

Nobody says he is guilty because nobody knows but BLIND LOYALTY TO A MAN CHARGED WITH WIFE ABUSE AND WORKPLACE HARRASSMENT IS STRANGE.

I might add, this was over FIFTEEN YEARS at least.

"But, but, but, I like him so he must be innocent and his accusers...are only money-grubbing opportunists."


The lengths to which excuses are made, for the inexcusable, and the abandoning of any morals/ethics/integrity of which they might have had (questionable of course)... never ceases to astound me.

Originally Posted by stupic (unt

[I]
"But, but, but, I like him so he must be innocent and his accusers...are only money-grubbing opportunists."


The lengths to which excuses are made, for the inexcusable, and the abandoning of any morals/ethics/integrity of which they might have had (questionable of course)... never ceases to astound me.:

So in yours, and Rockface's, opinion: any person that settles a law suit by paying money to the claimant is guilty???



Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-G890A using Tapatalk