![]() |
Quote:
Off the subject, but if Hillary was pres. and tried to circumvent congress, she would get slapped down also. Being a female will not help her because there is NO threat of rioting. No one would care about her being slammed. |
All of this is political jabber.
Why all the fuss..... Job loss in the USA is from losses to China plus technological changes. NAFTA losses have been extremely small. He continues to wrap his rhetoric in fear and despair. Vote for him, and your disappointment will actually be despair. And this is not partisan rhetoric from me.... I am a member of the GOP for 50 years. I am anti Obama policies and certainly anti Clinton. Most importantly, everything I have said is verifiable, if you want to do that. He is doing a con job, by scaring and playing on insecurities. He will insure that the Democrats are stronger in places they were not. He will help the Democrats to take over both the senate and the house. He is playing on your fears. In the last week, he has supported Bush, Rubio and Obama on immigration. He will change on a dime. |
"risen," says Harvard professor and trade expert Robert Lawrence. "In aggregate, the economy is close to full employment."
""History shows that trade made easy, affordable and fast...always begets more trade, more jobs, more prosperity," the founder and CEO of FedEx wrote in a recent Wall Street Journal op-ed. Who's right? Take a look at what has happened to blue-collar workers. Manufacturing jobs in the U.S. actually increased in the years after the North America Free Trade Agreement with Mexico and Canada went into effect in 1994. But the story changed dramatically in 2000. Since then, the U.S. has shed 5 million manufacturing jobs, a fact opponents of free trade mention often." "Trump and Bernie Sanders blame China for undercutting American workers with cheap labor (even Trump makes a lot of his suits and ties overseas). But there's another big factor: technology. Robots and machines are also replacing workers. The tech trend would have happened regardless of trade." ""Trump's talk on trade is bluster," says economist Charles Ballard of Michigan State University. "Even if you did [what Trump says], you wouldn't reverse the technology, which is a very big part of the picture." Trump's threat to put hefty taxes on Chinese and Mexican goods coming into the country would likely to sink the economy into a recession. It would make many items at the store more expensive for working class Americans and spark a global trade war. The U.S. tried this tactic in the 1930s with a law known as Smoot-Hawley Tariff Act. It backfired, pulling the U.S. further into the Great Depression." U.S. has lost 5 million manufacturing jobs since 2000 - Mar. 29, 2016 |
you may want to consider expanding your sources
|
Quote:
Trump needs 40% plus of the Hispanic vote to win the election. What did he say in his speech to attract Hispanics? He consistently polls in the teens with Hispanics and 2 or 3% with blacks. He walked right into a trap. All Hillary has to do is replay his speech on a loop from now until Nov 8 |
People in trumps inner circle know that trump will make Mexico and offer they can't refuse.
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
Pardon me, but you're in a fact-free zone once again. |
it did take guts to go there.
where's fat butt Hellary |
she wouldn't go to Mexico unless they donated to her Foundation
|
Quote:
Trump will win by a landslide, due to non-participation of the left. Trump still has motivation. Hillary is starting to look haggard, more than usual. The stress is getting to her and she looks ill. Kaine, the clown will probably have to take over for her before long. |
Quote:
|
2 Attachment(s)
Quote:
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:03 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Search Engine Optimisation provided by
DragonByte SEO v2.0.32 (Pro) -
vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2025 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.