Nothing to worry about. The old geezers who are doing their Tea Bag hate messages on this forum do not represent mainstream voters. They are the lunatic fringe and count for absolutely nothing.

The fragmented Old People's Party has lost touch with reality (as have the geezers) and will just dissolve away like yesterday's coffee grounds.

:agree::agree:

I guess that is debatable. I find it amusing when one resorts to "hate" and the deviant slur for the Tea Party that is commonly used by desperate liberals when they are unable to sustain a coercive/cohesive debate. Not being a Tea Party member, but finding no fault in their ideology I enjoy hearing from those that probably endorse the Occupy Wall Street deviants.

"Old Geezers" made this country, so a bit more respect in one's language is deserved, even if one doesn't agree.

And you all are the oh so organized with it.....what is appropriate as opposed to old geezers.....young punks.

Fortunately for all of us the crude and rude are a minority group in the overall scheme of reality. THANK GOD!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

The most jobs lost were under Obama.
The highest national debt in history - under Obama.
The highest and still highest food stamp rate - under Obama.
No budget for how many years? Under Obama and Democrat majority congress
Most folks leaving job force - under Obama
Most divisive president ever - Obama
Most flip-flops ever - Obama
Most lies ever - Obama
Most racially biased - Obama
Who said "Republicans can sit in the back of the bus" ?? Obama
Who said to Illegal Aliens "Republicans are your enemy" ?? Obama
Sorry, the list is too long. Yes, he is the most unpresidential yet, as well as unprofessional. I hope that the Republican hopefuls don't fall into the same trap of trying emulate his poor performance in order to get public favor.
We need a leader, manager, professional -- not an entertainer.

If Bush was a mistake then Obama was a world disaster. The world would be in better shape had we elected Romney. Just my opinion and not substantiated. But, one part of it is validated and that is the Obama disaster.

:agree::agree:

Party of old people ?

When did you last look at the leadership of the Democratic Party ?

Oooh there we go again.

Liberal Demorats who always equate disagreement with "hate" and completely confuse their mental state with normal ... which it's not. Entertaining if nothing else

:a20:

These "old geezers" have earned and enjoy a retirement. I wonder about the young that can afford to be on here instead of working for a living. Of course, thanks to Obama, you are not considered an adult until you are 26. :popcorn:

Sorry but "Tea B**" is a deviant slur more closely related to the liberal ideology than to "old geezers" of the right. If you check your history, references to the Tea Party had nothing to do with liberal sexual deviation. chilout

Most jobs lost under Obama! Is that right. The numbers below are in the thousands. George W. Bush R 2001–2005 132,696 132,752 +56 +0.01%
George W. Bush R 2005–2009 132,752 133,977 +1,225 +0.23%
Barack Obama D 2009–2013 133,977 135,293 +1,316 +0.25%
Barack Obama D 2013–2015 135,293 141,679 +6,386 +2.00

Bush jobs gained 1,281,000, and Obama 7,702,000. Bush's 2009 numbers are thru 9/30/09. That is the government's fiscal year. There is NOTHING that this president did in the first nine months of his presidency that anyone with an open mind would tag the job losses to him. The Great Recession is on "W". It bottom out in July, 2009.

Highest national debt in history. Of course, it is. The next president will have the highest national debt in history on the second day of their presidency. That assumes that day one debt increase will be $1.00. If you use the debt, when the great recession bottomed out, "W" added more debt than Obama has. That includes adding the debt caused by the Iraq war to Obama. add it to "W", and there is no contest. Bush blows him out of the water.

Should I go on? Why? The Republicans put all fact based number completely out of their mind. Why ruin their good rant? Anyone that actually throws facts out there is put on ignore by the "open minded Republicans" here. Mr. Sarcasm right back at you.

Most racially biased. I guess you kind of missed Andrew Jackson.

Most divisive president ever. I guess you missed Abraham Lincoln. McConnell, the filibuster king, had nothing at all to do with the divisiveness for the past six and a half years. It is all on President Obama.

Your list is a direct result of a closed mind, and a total distortion of facts.

And you "represent mainstream voters?" :1rotfl::a20:

Nice distortion job. I enjoy how some distort the facts or divert to smoke and mirrors to hide the facts.

Like I said, more folks have left the job force than ever before.
Gotta love the way some folks need to blame someone else for their leader's failure. Still blaming Bush?
How long did it take the Bush (not necessarily his total credit) administration or economy to get back on track after the stock crash after 9/11? Not very long. Obama still can't get it right. Why? Because he is an amateur and has no one working for him that has half a brain.
Jobs gained? Bush didn't need to have a giant gain in job growth because he had low unemployment. Obama lost so many jobs that even with more jobs created, his glass is only half full.
Middle class workers have lost their level in lifestyle.
Poverty level is higher.
How much whitewash are the liberals going to put on Obama's blunders and lack of leadership in his own party to cover up his total failure?
Obama is more interested in entertainment than working. He is lazy and inept. Even his wife avoids him like he is contagious.

""There is NOTHING that this president did in the first nine months of his presidency that anyone with an open mind would tag the job losses to him. ""

WRONG!!! Someone must have been sleeping or they would know better. :confused: