Talk of The Villages Florida

Talk of The Villages Florida (https://www.talkofthevillages.com/forums/)
-   The Villages, Florida, Political talk (https://www.talkofthevillages.com/forums/villages-florida-political-talk-88/)
-   -   Washington Post: "Rejecting of Keystone Pipeline; Act of National Insanity" (https://www.talkofthevillages.com/forums/villages-florida-political-talk-88/washington-post-rejecting-keystone-pipeline-act-national-insanity-47754/)

Guest 01-25-2012 12:51 PM

Quote:

Posted by Guest (Post 445075)
Richie says, "The tangent has swung wide, but that what happens when you try to defend the indefensible. You must divert, and this thread is a good illustration."

Since he opened the door, I have to add that this is the same tactic Newt used in the South Carolina debate when he refused to answer the question about his ex-wife's statements - and turned indignant toward the questioner that this gossip was no way to start a debate about national issues.

Newt could not defend the indefensible and therefore had to divert.

You have to admit that Newt does have good political consultants who prepped him with the proper answers and appropriate act for him to take. Still, he is a slimeball, Washington insider, career politician, and actor.

Newt says his ex-wife and you are lying. He got indignant, but he answered the question. Your example is "a fail" as the kids would say, but nice try. You're on your toes today.

Guest 01-25-2012 02:08 PM

Newt and Calista are both lying cheats. Amazing how the family values people are so easily fooled by these sleazes.

Guest 01-25-2012 03:16 PM

I'm still wondering what the difference is between Herman Cain's alleged 13 year affair and the famously poplular president Bill Clinton and His numerous affairs and one night stands and kneels...I guess it is all in one's perspective

Guest 01-25-2012 05:37 PM

Quote:

Posted by Guest (Post 445126)
Newt and Calista are both lying cheats. Amazing how the family values people are so easily fooled by these sleazes.

I get you, I really do. If you don't like someone, every allegation that is thrown at them is fervently believed by you as fact, and you'll stick with your view come hell or high water.

If you like someone, it's completely opposite. You wouldn't believe something against Obama or Clinton if you saw them doing it with your own eyes. You would defend them and pluck out your own eyes for lying to you.

I really do get it, old buddy.

Guest 01-26-2012 07:19 AM

Quote I saw last night..

"So let me see if I have this straight. Newt is depending on the children from his first wife to tell the world that his second wife is lying about his third wife."

Guest 01-26-2012 10:40 AM

Quote:

Posted by Guest (Post 445429)
Quote I saw last night..

"So let me see if I have this straight. Newt is depending on the children from his first wife to tell the world that his second wife is lying about his third wife."

You (the collective "you") have no real idea of the Gingrich family dynamic; you have to admit that much.

Making assumptions on the doings of another family is presumptuous.

We all love gossip though, don't we. Much more fun to just assume things.

Guest 01-26-2012 11:11 AM

Quote:

Posted by Guest (Post 444994)
What does any of this have to do with "Rejecting of Keystone Pipeline; Act of National Insanity"?

???

Guest 01-26-2012 12:18 PM

I make no assumptions. I just thought the line was funny.

There are time when Newt seems like a genius to me. And others when I look at him and the response is "WHAT is he SMOKING?".

It's hard to take someone preaching "family values" when you have as checkered a history as Newt does. I mean, he was screaming about Bill cheating on Hillary while doing the exact same thing.

Now, to your point, of course circumstances matter. Just like Newt, I'm on my third marriage. In my case, I married too young the first time (Lisa and I have a very friendly relationship these days though she's moved to Canada). The second time I was married for 19 years - my two daughters are from this marriage. Unfortunately my wife decided the grass was greener elsewhere and did everything she could to try and make me leave (you wouldn't believe the stories I could tell) - but I wouldn't. She finally left nearly 6 years ago. Now I'm married (for 1 1/2 years and counting) to a woman I can't imagine leaving.

So, yeah, circumstances matter.

I've always said that I thought Newt torpedoed himself when it comes to being President but that he still had a lot to offer as a consultant or advisor. In some areas, he certainly does have the lights on. But, President? Definitely not for me.

Guest 01-26-2012 02:37 PM

Quote:

Posted by Guest (Post 445534)
I make no assumptions. I just thought the line was funny.

There are time when Newt seems like a genius to me. And others when I look at him and the response is "WHAT is he SMOKING?".

It's hard to take someone preaching "family values" when you have as checkered a history as Newt does. I mean, he was screaming about Bill cheating on Hillary while doing the exact same thing.

Now, to your point, of course circumstances matter. Just like Newt, I'm on my third marriage. In my case, I married too young the first time (Lisa and I have a very friendly relationship these days though she's moved to Canada). The second time I was married for 19 years - my two daughters are from this marriage. Unfortunately my wife decided the grass was greener elsewhere and did everything she could to try and make me leave (you wouldn't believe the stories I could tell) - but I wouldn't. She finally left nearly 6 years ago. Now I'm married (for 1 1/2 years and counting) to a woman I can't imagine leaving.

So, yeah, circumstances matter.

I've always said that I thought Newt torpedoed himself when it comes to being President but that he still had a lot to offer as a consultant or advisor. In some areas, he certainly does have the lights on. But, President? Definitely not for me.


Well......I guess if it's Newt or Barry you're going to have to decide what to do. Vote for anyone else but Newt in that scenario and you've voted for Barry.

Guest 01-27-2012 07:26 AM

Quote:

Posted by Guest (Post 445579)
Well......I guess if it's Newt or Barry you're going to have to decide what to do. Vote for anyone else but Newt in that scenario and you've voted for Barry.

Unfortunately, there's more truth in that statement than I'd like.

To me, the decision is as follows...

Obama - definitely not my first choice. Could have done a LOT better with the economy but he seems to have stopped most of the bleeding. He's made more progress on most economic fronts than Reagan did with the mess he inherited from Carter. Remember that Reagan said it would take more than 4 years to recover from the mess - and he was right. Note that I said "stopped the bleeding" - this is a VERY anemic recovery and I can't help but to feel that the lack of string on TARP has something to do with it. Admittedly, I'm not sure what the President can do about one fundamental flaw in our system right now - the fact that companies are ONLY looking out for their shareholders - and then only for the next quarter with ver few exceptions (like Apple - sitting on $90B and refusing to do dividends or stock buybacks because that doesn't meet their long-term strategic goals).

Republicans - With the exception of Ron Paul, they all seem to want to return to the policies that got us into this mess un the first place. They want to de-regulate without any specifics - just demagoguery about jobs being strangled. So far, a vote for almost any of them seems like a vote for George W. Bush.

I'm normally an optimist but it's hard to keep that going under these circumstances.


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:29 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Search Engine Optimisation provided by DragonByte SEO v2.0.32 (Pro) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2025 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.