Posted by Guest

You're right! It's simply pathetic schoolyard bullying. I guess it's been working for them since they pushed people around and made fun of them on the elementary school playground, and it's still all they have. No facts. No logic. No rational thought. And certainly no questioning of what is right in front of their face. All of us who have questioned any of the lies and lunacy of the Trump Presidency on this website have faced this type of insane childish criticism. His supporters can't argue the facts so they attempt to attack the speaker.

Bottom line though is that we see through it. It's not going to work. I obviously don't care what someone thinks of me who denies the obvious, and I urge you to do the same. Their credibility was lost long ago. Hang in there, and keep on sharing the truth! Thanks for posting.

:BigApplause:

Posted by Guest (Post 1389846)

You're right! It's simply pathetic schoolyard bullying. I guess it's been working for them since they pushed people around and made fun of them on the elementary school playground, and it's still all they have. No facts. No logic. No rational thought. And certainly no questioning of what is right in front of their face. All of us who have questioned any of the lies and lunacy of the Trump Presidency on this website have faced this type of insane childish criticism. His supporters can't argue the facts so they attempt to attack the speaker.

Bottom line though is that we see through it. It's not going to work. I obviously don't care what someone thinks of me who denies the obvious, and I urge you to do the same. Their credibility was lost long ago. Hang in there, and keep on sharing the truth! Thanks for posting.

:BigApplause:

Posted by Guest (Post 1389890)

I had hoped we had seen the last of Affald though. See he is posting again.

Do have a lot of people on my Ignore List. I have often been way too sensitive for my own good. Their hero-- Donald John Trump-- used bullying to very good affect but this is not working all that well now that he actually has to get things done as POTUS.

Posted by Guest

It is easy to spot the embedded "Progressives" when they rave how great Obama and "Rules for Radicals" policies along with Hillary and her constant lying and corruption are touted as being the path to the future. It is no secret the patriotic Democrats won't support it and the loss of elections from local to state to federal proves the point. It was reported Maxine Waters and Elizabeth Warren are being considered for 2020 with their unhinged DNC chairman this should be fun to watch.

Posted by Guest

And, if there was a crime committed, there would be an indictment and trial.......where were those? Do you believe that in a Republican controlled Congress, that she could get away with any of that? Perhaps it is because there was no real illegal activity, and you just bought the Republican talking points, which, by the way, have been debunked and the reports of the committee have shown that their activity was a political witch hunt.

So, let that rest for a bit, and please inform me why, when over 90 people (American citizens) died in embassy attacks under Bush and Powell, were there no Congressional committees investigating those incidents.

Here is an interesting poll finding by Pew Research: prior to the election, less than 20% of Republicans felt that the economy was good, after the election over 80% of Republicans thought the economy was good. But, there was little, if any change in the economy during this past few months. So, if there is little ACTUAL change, it is the perception of who holds the presidential office: and if that is true, then those Republicans only believe what Trump tells them......and so far major news sources have documented well over 173 lies that Trump has told so far and that is a modest estimate because the number keeps growing.

I believe in factual discussion, I don't think that you have facts to support your opinion, but I am open to you providing actual verifiable factual data that we can openly debate. If you cannot provide that data (again that is verifiable and factual, not from pundits, or blogs, or editorials, or ultra-right or ultra-left wing sources) I would be more than eager to match your data with mine.

If you provide opinion, non-factual non-verifiable data, I will assume, as many other who have an intelligent perspective, that you have a problem with critical thinking, that you have a problem with reality, or that you have a chemical dependence problem, to name just a few things that clouds ones' ability to engage in intelligent discourse.

The other problem that you may have is that because you cannot intelligently argue a good case for Trump, you bring up old Republican talking points that have been proven false. Those types of people normally are in their first stages of dementia, or need to be in protective wards, and perhaps your family should consider one for you.

Posted by Guest

Are all of you BRAINWASHED! Come on, when will you start to join the
Real world. I know you must know that this is a man that needs mental help.
You should be concerned that Trump will do anything as a deversion, rather than EVER ADMIT THAT HE IS WRONG! How many times will you let this country down by turning your back to his OBVIOUS errors in judgement.
I know that if his tax return was available to Congress, the fall of TRUMP would be immediate, and you know that also!!

Posted by Guest

You asked for "factual" discussion, not opinion, and I provided it. Strangely, rather not so strangely, there has been no response. Suppose why that is? Did you even listen to the youtube recordings? My guesses would be that 1) either you didn't bother, or 2) you didn't like what you heard. Funny how that works. And just so you know, my doctor is required each year to test for early signs of dementia; I passed with flying colors. I have no substance abuse problems, either. As for critical thinking and the ability to handle things, you couldn't follow me around for even one day without crying 'uncle' and giving up.[/QUOT

Republicans find it so easy to put aside facts such as these.. They would rather believe that Michelle Obama is actually a man. Barack is gay and their daughters were fathered by someone else.

Posted by Guest

No, these are FACTS about the Benghazi LIES straight out of the mouths of Obama, Clinton, and Rice said on national television. Just because you refuse to acknowledge their lies has nothing to do with Republicans setting aside facts. They are not the ones denying or refusing to acknowledge what liberals choose to ignore, refuse to believe, or are in denial.

Posted by Guest

What did the Crooked Hillary supporter think when it became evident she had been lying all along...Oh that's right you voted for the biatch because she was a woman

Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-G890A using Tapatalk

Posted by Guest (Post 1391535)

And you voted for Trump because he was a MAN?

Posted by Guest

Sort of...

Lol. No, I voted for Trump cause he was the best choice on the ballot. Was he perfect, hell no. Was he better than Crooked Hillary, hell yes!

I guess I could have done what the idiot with "50 years experience in the political arena" did and vote for somebody that was not running for president...because I did not think any of the candidates were perfect in my eyes. Then non stop whining about the winner!



Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-G890A using Tapatalk

Posted by Guest (Post 1391600)

And may I ask who you voted for in the primary ?

Posted by Guest

Ask anything you want. And I will be happy to answer, after you respond to my questions that you
Ignored...


Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-G890A using Tapatalk

Posted by Guest

Not sure what question you refer to, but will stay on for a few minutes and try. If you asked why I voted as I did....I already answered.

My write in for McCollum was based on voting every election I can recall, and in good conscience I could not vote for either Trump or Clinton. I knew what I was doing but casting a vote is important to me and I found the two major candidates to both be offensive. In addition, I did consider simply avoiding the top line, but to me, and this is my vote, it was sort of a rebel vote.

Posted by Guest (Post 1391727)

That is the dumbest explanation for wasting a vote I have heard yet. You DO realize that you are admitting to being stupid?

Posted by Guest

Only a moron would write in a vote for someone who has zero chance. Anything this Moron says is forever ignored!

Posted by Guest

]
Voting for someone who you believe best aligns with your own beliefs and/or think will be the best leader of this country, instead of the person (regardless of being a lying, narcissistic nutcase) just because they have the right letter in front of their name...takes character and ethics.

Posted by Guest

Only a moron would write in a vote for someone who has zero chance. Anything this Moron says is forever ignored!

Posted by Guest

Wrong again. :oops:

Voting for someone who you believe best aligns with your own beliefs and/or think will be the best leader of this country, instead of the person (regardless of being a lying, narcissistic nutcase) just because they have the right letter in front of their name...takes character and ethics.

I know, I know, my point is too far above your head for a cultist to understand...but hey, it was worth a shot. :ohdear:



Deepest Sincere Wishes:. :wave:

Posted by Guest

Oh please...YOU voted for Hillary...a D...you'd have voted for ANY D over Trump. You're as sleazy as Hillary is with your dishonesty.

Posted by Guest

Oh please...YOU voted for Hillary...a D...you'd have voted for ANY D over Trump. You're as sleazy as Hillary is with your dishonesty.

Posted by Guest

Posted by Guest

Posted by Guest

While certainly not a lie, the fact that you take great umbrage with me donating to very many great social causes...really tickles the cockles of my heart.

Posted by Guest

Au contraire.

Don't sell DirtBag short.

He is definitely a cockroach also.

I've already sent in $100....with 10 poster's names. :D

Posted by Guest

Nice try, but trying to explain why I thought she would make the best leader (between two less than ideal candidates)...is much too complicated for a simpleton cultist like yourself. :oops:


Deepest Sincere Wishes:. :wave:

Posted by Guest

Posted by Guest

Next the (unt will be claiming she did not infer that people that do not speak good English are undocumented...
And, she will forget how she took her spouse to a 3rd world country for dentistry work and her terrific healthcare insurance will not cover "major medical issues" the spouse has incurred (due to the (unt's cheapness).
All examples of her "character" and "ethics"...

Posted by Guest (Post 1392366)

John Kasich would have been a better choice.