Talk of The Villages Florida

Talk of The Villages Florida (https://www.talkofthevillages.com/forums/)
-   The Villages, Florida, Political talk (https://www.talkofthevillages.com/forums/villages-florida-political-talk-88/)
-   -   Why do Republicans do tis ?? (https://www.talkofthevillages.com/forums/villages-florida-political-talk-88/why-do-republicans-do-tis-217194/)

janmcn 11-07-2016 06:30 PM

Quote:

Posted by Guest
Well, we Democrats believe she is persona non grata in The Villages and would love her to leave.

In fact, the former 6 PAC (now down to 3) are kindly invited to go with her.

'Nuff said.


Ms Milton is so enamored with Donald Trump that she carries his autograph around with her, even though he rated her a two on a scale of one to ten and told her to lose 50 pounds.

tomwed 11-07-2016 06:52 PM

Quote:

Posted by Guest
Says Hitlery that made a lucrative deal with Putin to sell 20% of the world's uranium to Russia. I think that I will be more inclined to believe Trump's word that he doesn't know the guy over Hitlery that has never told the truth in her life.

http://www.politifact.com/truth-o-meter/statements/2016/jun/30/donald-trump/donald-trump-inaccurately-suggests-clinton-got-pai/

Donald Trump inaccurately suggests Clinton got paid to approve Russia uranium deal

ColdNoMore 11-07-2016 08:08 PM

A very small, unpatriotic part of me almost wishes that Trump wins just so that I can point my finger at the idiots who voted for him and laugh while the economy tanks, unemployment goes back to the end of the Shrub Era, he still controls his company instead of putting it into a blind trust, he is surprised when it sinks in that he's not a King and Congress has to pass his nutjob agenda, he constantly goes publicly ballistic after being caught in lie after lie, he alienates most of the developed world, he shows how dumb he is on how the world actually works...and he turns his back on what a POTUS is supposed to do.

But alas, I love my country too much for that...so I will help ensure that he doesn't get that chance.

You Republicans can thank me later. :ho:

AJ32162 11-07-2016 08:16 PM

Quote:

Posted by Guest
A very small, unpatriotic part of me almost wishes that Trump wins just so that I can point my finger at the idiots who voted for him and laugh while the economy tanks, unemployment goes back to the end of the Shrub Era, he still controls his company instead of putting it into a blind trust, he is surprised when it sinks in that he's not a King and Congress has to pass his nutjob agenda, he constantly goes publicly ballistic after being caught in lie after lie, he alienates most of the developed world, he shows how dumb he is on how the world actually works...and he turns his back on what a POTUS is supposed to do.

But alas, I love my country too much for that...so I will help ensure that he doesn't get that chance.

You Republicans can thank me later. :ho:

Who will you blame when the economy tanks under a Hillary Clinton administration? The Republicans?

MDLNB 11-08-2016 06:29 AM

Quote:

Posted by Guest
http://www.politifact.com/truth-o-meter/statements/2016/jun/30/donald-trump/donald-trump-inaccurately-suggests-clinton-got-pai/

Donald Trump inaccurately suggests Clinton got paid to approve Russia uranium deal

Nice try.

Answer this question: DID Hitlery approve the transaction or not? I did not say that she received any money for it, but I believe those that say her "foundation" received money related to the agreement.

MDLNB 11-08-2016 06:33 AM

Quote:

Posted by Guest
Who will you blame when the economy tanks under a Hillary Clinton administration? The Republicans?

They'll still blame Bush, or if that gets old, they will try blaming Reagan again. Never a democrat. The left never does anything wrong. Never makes bad deals with our enemies, never gives classified information to uncleared persons, never lies about how she got her people killed, never lies to their families, never cheats on her taxes, never perjures herself under oath or to America, and never uses vulgar language.

tomwed 11-08-2016 06:35 AM

Quote:

Posted by Guest
Nice try.

Answer this question: DID Hitlery approve the transaction or not? I did not say that she received any money for it, but I believe those that say her "foundation" received money related to the agreement.

"a lucrative deal with Putin to sell 20% of the world's uranium to Russia."


"First, the State Department did approve of Russia’s gradual takeover of a company with significant U.S. uranium assets, but it didn’t act unilaterally. State was one of nine government agencies, not to mention independent federal and state nuclear regulators, that had to sign off on the deal.

Second, while nine people related to the company did donate to the Clinton Foundation, it’s unclear whether they were still involved in the company by the time of the Russian deal and stood to benefit from it.

Third, most of their Clinton Foundation donations occurred before and during Hillary Clinton’s 2008 presidential bid, before she could have known she would become secretary of state.

The bottom line: While the connections between the Clinton Foundation and the Russian deal may appear fishy, there’s simply no proof of any quid pro quo."

jimbo2012 11-08-2016 06:48 AM

Quote:

Posted by Guest

"First, the State Department did approve of Russia’s gradual takeover of a company with significant U.S. uranium assets, but it didn’t act unilaterally. State was one of nine government agencies, not to mention independent federal and state nuclear regulators, that had to sign off on the deal.

Second, while nine people related to the company did donate to the Clinton Foundation, it’s unclear whether they were still involved in the company by the time of the Russian deal and stood to benefit from it.

Third, most of their Clinton Foundation donations occurred before and during Hillary Clinton’s 2008 presidential bid, before she could have known she would become secretary of state.

The bottom line: While the connections between the Clinton Foundation and the Russian deal may appear fishy, there’s simply no proof of any quid pro quo."

Where do you get this from?

R U going to say the Foundation is not corrupt next?

MDLNB 11-08-2016 07:01 AM

Quote:

Posted by Guest
"a lucrative deal with Putin to sell 20% of the world's uranium to Russia."


"First, the State Department did approve of Russia’s gradual takeover of a company with significant U.S. uranium assets, but it didn’t act unilaterally. State was one of nine government agencies, not to mention independent federal and state nuclear regulators, that had to sign off on the deal.

Second, while nine people related to the company did donate to the Clinton Foundation, it’s unclear whether they were still involved in the company by the time of the Russian deal and stood to benefit from it.

Third, most of their Clinton Foundation donations occurred before and during Hillary Clinton’s 2008 presidential bid, before she could have known she would become secretary of state.

The bottom line: While the connections between the Clinton Foundation and the Russian deal may appear fishy, there’s simply no proof of any quid pro quo."

Without SecState Hitlery's approval, the uranium deal would not have been approved, PERIOD.

It was a simple question, but since it was too difficult for you to answer with a yes or no, I did it for you.

Next thing you will do is deny that the Secstate has nothing to do with the approval for the pipeline from Canada.

Don Baldwin 11-08-2016 07:18 AM

Quote:

Posted by Guest
I guess you forget the blacks saying obama gone pay my bills,etc,etc

He DOES pay their bills...for the majority anyway. Free housing, food, cable, phone, education...up to $60,000 in benefits a year.

Quote:

Posted by Guest
Aileen Milton, the tea party queen, was interviewed on TV last week and clearly stated democrats are persona non grata in TV. Her exact words were these socialist democrats can go back where they came from. (she just eliminated half the population as buyers in TV).

So? What's wrong with that? Half of them are minorities that we don't want here anyway. The other half WANT minorities living here. I'm glad they don't consider moving here.

Quote:

Posted by Guest
Interesting that you liberals that spew tolerance are anything BUT tolerant. Sorry, but my wife likes it here so you are stuck with me. If she goes first, I may go back to the Carolinas. The way socialism (liberalism) is spreading like a cancer, I'll find some place else to finish up, when there are too many libtards around here. But, I am sure that the new American socialists will have changed the name of our country by then. Perhaps the USSA?

They're tolerant of those they shouldn't be tolerant of...the people actually destroying America...the minorities. And they're INtolerant of those trying to SAVE America from the minorities.

Good luck...about the only safe place is the frozen north. Minorities don't like the cold.

It'll be called Mexico, perhaps Mexico II or New New Mexico. Hispanics are successfully breeding us out. They're 1/3 the population, growing rapidly. They already own the border counties.

Quote:

Posted by Guest
They'll still blame Bush, or if that gets old, they will try blaming Reagan again. Never a democrat. The left never does anything wrong. Never makes bad deals with our enemies, never gives classified information to uncleared persons, never lies about how she got her people killed, never lies to their families, never cheats on her taxes, never perjures herself under oath or to America, and never uses vulgar language.

ALL administrations rob us, deceive us, profit from us.

tomwed 11-08-2016 07:25 AM

Quote:

Posted by Guest
Where do you get this from?

R U going to say the Foundation is not corrupt next?

I thought I cited the source.

Donald Trump inaccurately suggests Clinton got paid to approve Russia uranium deal | PolitiFact

I along with many others have fact checked and posted about the foundation. Try googling fact check Clinton Foundation.

jimbo2012 11-08-2016 07:29 AM

Quote:

Posted by Guest
I thought I cited the source.

No Tom, you have cited bias sources, have you looked at wikileaks?

Cedwards38 11-08-2016 07:43 AM

When it comes to politics and religion, people will believe what they want to believe from whatever biased source they choose to read and hear, regardless of logic, rational thought, and obvious truth. In politics and religion there is no truth, but only spin. Politics and religion are fueled with passion, anger, ego, and bravado. Too often people use politics and religion to judge others, when the real purpose of both is to set a standard to judge yourself and what sort of person you really are. People treat politics and religion as a sport. They want their "favorite team" to win at all costs, even if the costs are truth and virtue. We are perfectly willing to deny the obvious truths, or believe the obvious lies if it furthers our team. And I have to say that I believe that too much money has ruined both politics and religion.

Frankly, I hope the subsequent generations, including my two daughters, view both politics and religion with more sanity, civility, and intelligence than I see our generation exhibit.

tomwed 11-08-2016 07:47 AM

Quote:

Posted by Guest
No Tom, you have cited bias sources, have you looked at wikileaks?

I'll read whatever you post. And I do research any site I post for bias. If I'm not comfortable with the source I ignore it.

jimbo2012 11-08-2016 08:01 AM

and that is your choice.


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:44 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Search Engine Optimisation provided by DragonByte SEO v2.0.32 (Pro) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2025 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.