Only in the vein of BHO is Hillary qualified. She's a lier, is deceitful, self absorbed, has very poor moral values and no ethics. So if this is the type of person you think is qualified to run for president, then that explains how BHO was elected twice.

:boom:

:boom:

Hmmmmmmmmmmmmm Several posters have said Ruibo Cruz, et al will reduce social security but Clinton said she is going to protect social security.
The öperative"word is "said" Social security was enacted in 1934 and despite publicity to the contrary FDR was forced to agree to social security because of the usual extortion that goes on between the two parties. Politicians have been kicking this can (social security) down the road since then as it plays nicely to the masses. Folks this thread is sounding more and more like "my father can beat your father up"

Maybe it needs a rest?


Personal Best Regards:

[QUOTE=Guest;1049531]Hmmmmmmmmmmmmm Several posters have said Ruibo Cruz, et al will reduce social security but Clinton said she is going to protect social security.
--------

No, it is NOT the posters who have said that some of the Republican candidates will reduce Social Security retirement benefits. It has been said by THE Republican candidates themselves.

Personally, I am in favor of means testing for Social Security retirement benefits. If a retired person has enough savings and investments, they should not get the full amount of retirement and have it based on a sliding scale from a small reduction to full reduction.

Yes, everyone would still be forced to pay into SS and Medicare.

I`m the guy that wrote what you called B.S. I stand by what I said . This SS Agent was able to transfer to a different assignment which did not involve the First Family .
People forget that the SS is part of the US Treasury Department . Many SS Agents investigate securities and currency fraud .

[quote=Guest;1049649]So, how much of your Social Security are you willing to give up?

For those who are enthusiastic backers of Sec. Clinton for President . Please explain to us what you believe she will acomplish if she becomes the CEO of the USA .
I think that it would be insightful .

[quote=Guest;1049669] All of it. I current donate all of my Social Security to charity. I would continue to do that amount even if I did not receive Social Security.

So, how much of your Social Security are YOU willing to give up?

[quote=Guest;1049649]Thanks for being honest ... and spoken like the true Socialist you are. You guys love to "force" people to do things as a general rule.

Actually, and better still, request some Rodham-Clinton supporter contrast her ACCOMPLISHMENTS with those of Carly Fiorina ... who really was a CEO. (worked her way up from secretary)

http://www.encyclopedia.com/topic/Carly_Fiorina.aspx

[quote=Guest;1049681]First let me say that the means testing and income redistribution was your proposal not mine. With that said, it is unlikely that I will ever receive any Social Security benefits. I sold a multi-million dollar business (sorry, Obama but I did build it) a few years ago and will not be eligible for full benefits for nearly 20 years. With means testing as you propose, I will no doubt forfeit all of it. So, to answer your question all of it.

Hillary “Fat Cat” Clinton is a source of continuing entertainment.

Her willingness to pander to any group, and say ANYTHING to get elected knows no boundaries. The most recent evidence of this is her pledge to “topple the top 1%” !! Unreal!!

Hillary Clinton Calls For 'Toppling' The 1 Percent

First of all, she’s now worth $150 million … so she’s in the top one tenth of the “one percent”. Words are beginning to fail me regarding her hypocrisy.

Second, she’s never had a real job … her wealth has come solely from her and Bill’s political careers, and most recently, in effect selling influence for future access.

Third, all of her buddies and friends are the top 1% so I doubt she will screw them (although who knows?)

Fourth, there’s no doubt there is a huge pool of resentful liberals with untapped sources of inner rage to whom this patently transparent appeal will resonate.

What a total joke this woman has become. That’s not to say the large number of dumbasses in this country won’t elect her, just as they did with Obama, but her “fakery” is apparently unlimited.

[quote=Guest;1049686] Socialist or Progressive? I have no problem with being called either one.

As far as forcing people to continue paying into Social Security and Medicare - just consider it a tax. We are "forced" into paying a school tax even though we have no school kids anymore, aren't we?

Interesting news developing,,,,,

"...one of the biggest benefactors to the Clinton Foundation has been trading with Iran and may be in breach of US sanctions imposed on the country."

No big deal, right ?

http://www.newsweek.com/2015/04/24/h...de-322253.html

So much chatter on here about Hillary Clinton and the Clinton Foundation. How many people actually know the purpose of the Clinton Foundation? I suggest you actually research the topic BEFORE writing your pathetic posts. You will find it is a charitable foundation that has helped milliions of people around the world. Of course, to most of the right wing nuts - and gang of 6 - helping people is not what they are about.