This is a very humorous thread. The question is NOT "why Billary is qualified to be president" but WHY anyone would be of questionable mind bent to vote for such a person of obviously major personality flaws, questionable honesty and ethically corrupt. Anyone of us with less political pull and influence as the Clintons, would have been incarcerated long ago for the laws that they have broken.

But, you are right about one thing; she IS qualified for the position. Question is, do we want someone with such a corrupt nature representing America? "Qualified?" Yes, after seeing what was elected last two terms, we have proof that anyone that's breathing and can read from a teleprompter is qualified for the position. Maybe they can't handle the job, but anyone can be elected to the job.

But - can any Republican be elected? :D

Probably not. Most Republicans believe in the American Way, not European socialism. Republicans believe in equal opportunity IF you qualify. Liberals believe that the opportunity should be adjusted so that you DO qualify.

If you are motivated then the conservative way is the best way. If you are lazy, then the liberal way is the best way. Paint it any way you wish, but that's the way it is.

Republicans believe that everyone has an opportunity and whether you take advantage of it is up to you. Liberals believe that everyone should be the same and ignores the facts that some people are more intelligent, have more ambition, take more risks, etc.

You're right, she probably is the best democrat choice!

We've seen how incompetent lawyers have been in leadership positions. Sure, they know the law(or how to circumvent it) but they don't have any idea how to run a business. Personally, I would like to see a successful business leader helping America prosper. One that brings EVERYONE up in living standard, not just the poor. If you compare many other countries' middle class, you will find that they are hardly living above our lower class. I have lived in or visited many countries of the world and believe me when I tell you, they don't have anything on us. But, we won't be like that for long if we continue down this "European Socialist" dream that our liberal leaders insist on pushing us into. Like I told one person that worked with me, "instead of being insulted by violations of PC, you should be attempting to improve one's opinion of you by improving your work ethic." No one concentrates on your ethnicity, gender or sexual orientation, when they are looking at job performance and reputation.

Instead of making history by electing the first woman president, we should be looking for the best candidate that will bring the country back together again instead of dividing it to the point of revolution. Put these kids to work and they won't be looking to join a radical terrorist group. Instead of electing the best man for president last term, you elected the first "black" president. Let's not make the same mistake again, just because Billary is female. If you are going to elect a female, find one that you can trust. And maybe this time, find someone that knows how to make money, not spend it.

I sincerely hope that she is not the BEST that Democrats have to offer.

How about Hillary Clinton raising 45 million dollars in the quarter just ended beating Barack Obama's 43 million dollars in 2011 for the same period? Would that be an accomplishment or an activity according to Carly Fiorina, who raised one million dollars?

If Fiorina makes the debate stage next month, that will be an accomplishment, but don't bet on it.

It would only impress me depending on 2 things - where did the money come from and how hard (and I might add, ethically) did one work to get it? Otherwise, the numbers are meaningless.

You're right.......that's a pretty low bar. Doesn't say much for the Democratic party.

An alarming activity. Without knowing the sources one cannot really say..
Alarming? Yes if all legitimate it confirms the democrats do not care at all about ethics, credibility, honesty or capabilities. They only care about the continuation of the hand outs and selective law enforcement and racism. The open border policy, allowing felons to vote, no voter ID requirements are all aimed at building the voter base that is invested in tcurrent hand out mode.

Alarming? Yes. We are not so slowly being outnumbered. At some point Charles Manson could be a democratic contender and as long as the party nods OK the rank and file, the lemmings, the free loaders will provide the vote.
Well maybe this is an exaggeration but it sure seems like it when one continues to witness the increasing tolerance for party first, we the people some where down the list.

Alarming? Yes!

For dogcatcher

Other than her spouse, does she have any experience "For dogcatcher?" :D

Were you just as curious about where Mitt Romney's one billion dollars came from or Barack Obama's one billion dollars came from in the general election of 2012? Or is it just a misogynistic point of view?

This is so hysterical coming from the party that thought Sarah Palin was qualified to be President of the United States.