It is stated in the religion of those in Iran to not have or honoe agreements with infidels (that's us) as they are inferior. And if there is an agreement they feel no obligation to honor it.

Plus the fact they are involved in one way or another with most of the terrorism in the area and around the world.

They are sworn to kill infidels (that would be us again).

In the face of the experts who state there is more to fear from Iran than there is from ISIS.

Is his diretion to Kerry like it was to Pelosi when she was whipping the team to get the ACA passed....he said to get something approved by (whatever date). Something?

Why is Obama pursuing this course? To add to his legacy which only he has an eye toward.

Since the man is a proven liar and 100% not transparent in his dealings...who knows.

Originally Posted by Guest

Since the man is a proven liar and 100% not transparent in his dealings...who knows.

I think it might have something to do with Allah Akbar

How about to prevent all out nuclear war with Iran?

Originally Posted by Guest

How about to prevent all out nuclear war with Iran?

Please reread post #! carefully. Iran will do what Iran WANTS to do - a treaty, a promise means NOTHING to them.

Obama is aiding and abetting his muslim brothers so that they can speed up the overtake of this country. Plain and simple!!

Originally Posted by Guest

Obama is aiding and abetting his muslim brothers so that they can speed up the overtake of this country. Plain and simple!!

The Tri-County Tea Party and The Villages KKK woke up early today, I see.

Along with the gang of six

That would be the villages tea party. They are too radical for the tri county tea party.

There is definitely a group of posters that would be considered a one trick pony. Attack Obama in the most insulting and name calling way. It's a schoolyard mentality that denotes a low skill level in communication. In truth, I almost enjoy the lambasters for their inane comments. It's kind of like this guy...

uploadfromtaptalk1426945800829.jpg

Originally Posted by Chi-Town

There is definitely a group of posters that would be considered a one trick pony. Attack Obama in the most insulting and name calling way. It's a schoolyard mentality that denotes a low skill level in communication. In truth, I almost enjoy the lambasters for their inane comments. It's kind of like this guy...

Attachment 49270

Well the reverse is also sadly true where, no matter how idiotic the position Obama takes, supporters like you will always defend him.

Why don't you summarize the case for Obama's "deal" with Iran in crisp terms, and further explain why you are ok with Iran getting a nuke in ten years or less.

Originally Posted by Guest

It is stated in the religion of those in Iran to not have or honoe agreements with infidels (that's us) as they are inferior. And if there is an agreement they feel no obligation to honor it.

Plus the fact they are involved in one way or another with most of the terrorism in the area and around the world.

They are sworn to kill infidels (that would be us again).

In the face of the experts who state there is more to fear from Iran than there is from ISIS.

Is his diretion to Kerry like it was to Pelosi when she was whipping the team to get the ACA passed....he said to get something approved by (whatever date). Something?

Why is Obama pursuing this course? To add to his legacy which only he has an eye toward.

This sounds eerily similar to the lead up to the Iraq war based on lies about weapons of mass destruction that would destroy the US. Over a decade later, trillions of dollars in debt, hundreds of thousands killed, Saddam Hussein is gone replaced by ISIS. If that was the mission, you could say 'mission accomplished'.

Remember John McCain's little ditty during the 2008 campaign...bomb, bomb, bomb, bomb, bomb Iran. Thank goodness he lost the election.

Originally Posted by Guest

Well the reverse is also sadly true where, no matter how idiotic the position Obama takes, supporters like you will always defend him.

Why don't you summarize the case for Obama's "deal" with Iran in crisp terms, and further explain why you are ok with Iran getting a nuke in ten years or less.

Originally Posted by Guest

Well the reverse is also sadly true where, no matter how idiotic the position Obama takes, supporters like you will always defend him.

Why don't you summarize the case for Obama's "deal" with Iran in crisp terms, and further explain why you are ok with Iran getting a nuke in ten years or less.

Let me help you state your case on a Dale Carnegie handbook in an abbreviated way:

"Wouldn't you agree that Obama’s deal with Iran would lead to a nuclear Iran?" ..............................
"Based on your input I have a solution you may like."

That's how you sell it.

Originally Posted by Guest

This sounds eerily similar to the lead up to the Iraq war based on lies about weapons of mass destruction that would destroy the US. Over a decade later, trillions of dollars in debt, hundreds of thousands killed, Saddam Hussein is gone replaced by ISIS. If that was the mission, you could say 'mission accomplished'.

Remember John McCain's little ditty during the 2008 campaign...bomb, bomb, bomb, bomb, bomb Iran. Thank goodness he lost the election.

First of all, in order to argue intelligently, you need to start by getting your basic facts straight.

For several years after the surge Iraq was relatively peaceful. Then, in 2011 and against the advice of his generals, Obama pulled out all US troops. He did this for political purposes. He created a power vacuum and ISIS filled it. In the world of high strategy where I used to work, we had an elegant term for leaders who made bad decisions like that ... to wit, we identied them as "dumbass"

Let me say it another way so that its unambigous for you -- there was no ISIS until Obama's incompetence enabled it to come into being. Do you understand that at all? Would you like to argue it?

In sum Barack Obama is, metaphorically speaking, the Father of ISIS