Why is Obama pursuing an agreement with Iran?

» Site Navigation
Home Page The Villages Maps The Villages Activities The Villages Clubs The Villages Book Healthcare Rentals Real Estate Section Classified Section The Villages Directory Home Improvement Site Guidelines Advertising Info Register Now Video Tutorials Frequently Asked Questions
» Newsletter Signup
» Premium Tower
» Advertisements
» Trending News
» Tower Sponsors




















» Premium Sponsors
» Banner Sponsors
» Advertisements
 
Thread Tools
  #1  
Old 03-21-2015, 06:28 AM
Guest
n/a
 
Posts: n/a
Default Why is Obama pursuing an agreement with Iran?

It is stated in the religion of those in Iran to not have or honoe agreements with infidels (that's us) as they are inferior. And if there is an agreement they feel no obligation to honor it.

Plus the fact they are involved in one way or another with most of the terrorism in the area and around the world.

They are sworn to kill infidels (that would be us again).

In the face of the experts who state there is more to fear from Iran than there is from ISIS.

Is his diretion to Kerry like it was to Pelosi when she was whipping the team to get the ACA passed....he said to get something approved by (whatever date). Something?

Why is Obama pursuing this course? To add to his legacy which only he has an eye toward.
  #2  
Old 03-21-2015, 06:31 AM
Guest
n/a
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Since the man is a proven liar and 100% not transparent in his dealings...who knows.
  #3  
Old 03-21-2015, 06:37 AM
Guest
n/a
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Guest View Post
Since the man is a proven liar and 100% not transparent in his dealings...who knows.
I think it might have something to do with Allah Akbar
  #4  
Old 03-21-2015, 06:49 AM
Guest
n/a
 
Posts: n/a
Post

How about to prevent all out nuclear war with Iran?
  #5  
Old 03-21-2015, 07:04 AM
Guest
n/a
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Guest View Post
How about to prevent all out nuclear war with Iran?
Please reread post #! carefully. Iran will do what Iran WANTS to do - a treaty, a promise means NOTHING to them.
  #6  
Old 03-21-2015, 07:06 AM
Guest
n/a
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Obama is aiding and abetting his muslim brothers so that they can speed up the overtake of this country. Plain and simple!!
  #7  
Old 03-21-2015, 07:35 AM
Guest
n/a
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Guest View Post
Obama is aiding and abetting his muslim brothers so that they can speed up the overtake of this country. Plain and simple!!
The Tri-County Tea Party and The Villages KKK woke up early today, I see.
  #8  
Old 03-21-2015, 07:37 AM
Guest
n/a
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Along with the gang of six
  #9  
Old 03-21-2015, 07:38 AM
Guest
n/a
 
Posts: n/a
Default

That would be the villages tea party. They are too radical for the tri county tea party.
  #10  
Old 03-21-2015, 08:50 AM
Guest
n/a
 
Posts: n/a
Default

There is definitely a group of posters that would be considered a one trick pony. Attack Obama in the most insulting and name calling way. It's a schoolyard mentality that denotes a low skill level in communication. In truth, I almost enjoy the lambasters for their inane comments. It's kind of like this guy...

uploadfromtaptalk1426945800829.jpg
  #11  
Old 03-21-2015, 08:58 AM
Guest
n/a
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Chi-Town View Post
There is definitely a group of posters that would be considered a one trick pony. Attack Obama in the most insulting and name calling way. It's a schoolyard mentality that denotes a low skill level in communication. In truth, I almost enjoy the lambasters for their inane comments. It's kind of like this guy...

Attachment 49270
Well the reverse is also sadly true where, no matter how idiotic the position Obama takes, supporters like you will always defend him.

Why don't you summarize the case for Obama's "deal" with Iran in crisp terms, and further explain why you are ok with Iran getting a nuke in ten years or less.
  #12  
Old 03-21-2015, 09:05 AM
Guest
n/a
 
Posts: n/a
Post

Quote:
Originally Posted by Guest View Post
It is stated in the religion of those in Iran to not have or honoe agreements with infidels (that's us) as they are inferior. And if there is an agreement they feel no obligation to honor it.

Plus the fact they are involved in one way or another with most of the terrorism in the area and around the world.

They are sworn to kill infidels (that would be us again).

In the face of the experts who state there is more to fear from Iran than there is from ISIS.

Is his diretion to Kerry like it was to Pelosi when she was whipping the team to get the ACA passed....he said to get something approved by (whatever date). Something?

Why is Obama pursuing this course? To add to his legacy which only he has an eye toward.

This sounds eerily similar to the lead up to the Iraq war based on lies about weapons of mass destruction that would destroy the US. Over a decade later, trillions of dollars in debt, hundreds of thousands killed, Saddam Hussein is gone replaced by ISIS. If that was the mission, you could say 'mission accomplished'.

Remember John McCain's little ditty during the 2008 campaign...bomb, bomb, bomb, bomb, bomb Iran. Thank goodness he lost the election.
  #13  
Old 03-21-2015, 09:58 AM
Guest
n/a
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Guest View Post
Well the reverse is also sadly true where, no matter how idiotic the position Obama takes, supporters like you will always defend him.

Why don't you summarize the case for Obama's "deal" with Iran in crisp terms, and further explain why you are ok with Iran getting a nuke in ten years or less.

  #14  
Old 03-21-2015, 10:16 AM
Guest
n/a
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Guest View Post
Well the reverse is also sadly true where, no matter how idiotic the position Obama takes, supporters like you will always defend him.

Why don't you summarize the case for Obama's "deal" with Iran in crisp terms, and further explain why you are ok with Iran getting a nuke in ten years or less.
Let me help you state your case on a Dale Carnegie handbook in an abbreviated way:

"Wouldn't you agree that Obamas deal with Iran would lead to a nuclear Iran?" ..............................
"Based on your input I have a solution you may like."

That's how you sell it.
  #15  
Old 03-21-2015, 10:27 AM
Guest
n/a
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Guest View Post
This sounds eerily similar to the lead up to the Iraq war based on lies about weapons of mass destruction that would destroy the US. Over a decade later, trillions of dollars in debt, hundreds of thousands killed, Saddam Hussein is gone replaced by ISIS. If that was the mission, you could say 'mission accomplished'.

Remember John McCain's little ditty during the 2008 campaign...bomb, bomb, bomb, bomb, bomb Iran. Thank goodness he lost the election.
First of all, in order to argue intelligently, you need to start by getting your basic facts straight.

For several years after the surge Iraq was relatively peaceful. Then, in 2011 and against the advice of his generals, Obama pulled out all US troops. He did this for political purposes. He created a power vacuum and ISIS filled it. In the world of high strategy where I used to work, we had an elegant term for leaders who made bad decisions like that ... to wit, we identied them as "dumbass"

Let me say it another way so that its unambigous for you -- there was no ISIS until Obama's incompetence enabled it to come into being. Do you understand that at all? Would you like to argue it?

In sum Barack Obama is, metaphorically speaking, the Father of ISIS
 

Thread Tools

You are viewing a new design of the TOTV site. Click here to revert to the old version.

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:01 AM.