![]() |
Whose ox?
Dennis -
Your post about the retired teachers getting a year's salary for working 10 days a year for 3 years in Green Bay and even a better deal in Madison sounds like a bad deal for taxpayers - BUT - if YOU were a retired teacher or family member of one in Green Bay or Madison, would YOU like the deal? See, it all depends whose ox is being gored. What is bad for some is great for others. Your honest answer will most likely be that you would take the deal and be very happy. Is there any further development as to whether or not Wisconsin teachers will strike? Most of the students don't care - even though they say they are on the side of the teachers. They just want time off of school. Why is it that Wisconsin and Iowa have the greatest number of young people (student ages) that are addicts to meth? These states used to have great work ethic but no longer. |
It's been fairly quiet since the bill was passed by the Senate Wednesday and signed by the governor Friday.
There are protestors in Madison and several groups are picketing other state office buildings but nothing like it was the past month. Maybe all the out-of -state union workers that were picketing finally went back home to take a shower! This is far from over as there will be challenges and court cases but Governor Walker and the Republican Senators believe everything was done legally. I'm sure they had dozens of constitutional attorneys review and approve everything they did so hopefully nothing will be overturned. They have arrested the individual that sent the death threats to the Republican senators. The person is female but that's all that has been released. But...there were other threats and no news on those. It's unfortunate that a minority of people can cause such problems. |
BBQMan....10 year sweetheart deal is up and guess what Pfizer is gone. And please look up Supreme Court ruling on eminant domain as it concerns Pfizer and New London residents. One other point..the 1400 jobs were not new jobs most people were transferred from Groton.
|
http://www.nytimes.com/2009/11/13/ny.../13pfizer.html more for BBQ on the Pfizer deal
|
Wisconsin/Iowa
tbug, I can answer your question about the drug problem in Wisconsin/Iowa and its effect on the state, students, et al. In the early and late 80's the gangs from Chicago infiltrated both states and it wasn't until kids started showing up in the emergency rooms did the authorities have a clue of the enormous drug problem. I mean Des Moines leadership actualy believed in their own press that is too busy pumping up the quiet and not having big city problems propaganda when these deviates came in and ended all of that . I do believe that the drug culture has had a devasting affect on our country by increasing crime by young people who if were not chemically affected would have never given thought to those actions that caused others harm. And in great part for the decline in our educational system and the bad behavior by our young, you k now the jersey shore types. Our leaders have failed on the war on drugs because they chose to.
As to your reference " depends on whose ox is being gored" the obvious answer pertiaining to the Wisconsin issue is the taxpayer of course. When a worker becomes more obsessed about what they are earning than how they are performing quality/quantity slip. I have seen it time and time again I cannot tell you the number of employees I dealt with who actually believed they were worth much more than they were being paid. So we implemented a program to see how employees rated themselves and how their peers and supervisors rated them. Does the term " legend in his own mind " ring a bell. As I stated in a previous post I was always about being professional first and as a manager always setting good example and never espousing poision leadership. duty first. Unionization negates all of that and more and so as a taxpayer I believe its my ox that gored.:22yikes: |
Quote:
|
Quote:
Ronald Reagan, 1981 |
I just find it astounding the double-standard here.
Like I said, I'm no fan of unions because of every experience I've had with them (granted much of that was second-hand, having to deal with peeling my ex-wife off the ceiling from the stress that she got from the postal unions which she refused to join). On the one hand, when the workers band together and demand better wages and benefits, this is bad. (My personal belief when it comes to public unions is that you could fix a lot of the problem if you simply made it less impossible to get rid of do-nothing or incompetent employees - there used to be a guarantee of quality when you 'bought union') On the other, when you get the logical result of the "race to the bottom" wages, people scream that workers aren't being paid "a living wage". Worse yet, someone in China or Mumbai might do the work for pennies on the dollar. This is a fundamental problem with unskilled labor. Where is the middle ground? We're no longer in the position we were in the 1950s when we were the only industrialized nation that hadn't had it's base bombed back to the Stone Age. By no means would I want everyone replaced with minimum wage drones. "Back in the day", minimum wage was a place to START your career. You weren't expected to be able to afford everything (like your own 2BR apartment or something like it) on that money (as many so-called "advocates" would have you believe). When I worked for minimum wage, I had this thing called "a roommate". Apparently, due to the financial crisis, this forgotten concept is coming back into vogue - like some paleontologist just rediscovered it.. |
Rubicon, very good reply to my post.
|
No struggle.
No progress!!
btk |
IowaParkersburg -
Lou, Federal government employees have the right to join a union. Look at National Federation of Federal Employees (NFFE) and American Federation of Government Employees (AFGE). They represent their members and even non-members for violations of hiring practices, unfair labor practices, unfair promotion practices, illegal terminations, and other issues. They are a necessary force as a go-between for labor and management. Federal union officials also testify before Congress when it is time for salaries and wages to be discussed. This is for the entire Federal workforce but union officials make their viewpoints known. Federal unions do NOT have the right to strike. You, as a contract officer, did not have the right to be a union member since you were considered management. However, your employees had that right. |
Quote:
This is one area where, unbelievably it may seem to others in this forum, where we are in agreement. The number of people, especially those that were in blue collar positions, who discount the value of the union to the working man is mind boggling. I'll always say that the true power in this country is money. Those that have the money have the power. There is only one challenge to that power, and that is the power of the workers to organize. Of course, those with the money are fighting tooth and nail to undermine this challenge to their power and their allies are the Republican Party and the conservative media. I understand that the public unions are totally different to the private unions, but we are all going down the drain together. I am usually sympathetic to the argument that the public unions drain the money of the taxpayer who doesn't have the same compensation as the public union worker, but then in arguing this the conservative broadcaster can't resist lumping in examples of private union problems as in the case of General Motors. Now, General Motors union employees had a lucrative deal, there is no denying that. The point is that the company, General Motors, negotiated this deal with the UAW and did not put one red cent into a fund to finance this deal. Then when General Motors began to fail and the bill became due to pay their contracted workers, they didn't have the money. Duh!!! All you hear from the great Rush Limbaugh, Sean Hannity and the like, who I admire by the way, is that the unions killed the golden goose. I can agree that the union had a deal that might have been too lucrative, but the corporation agreed to this. Not one mention is made of the startling fact that the company didn't have a fund in place to pay for their contracted agreements. It's reported that the fault is totally with the union and that is just plain old American bull crap. If the pension fund had been with the UAW this would never have happened. And that is because the Union would have been in the position of having to maintain the fund and it would have been their responsibility to do so. GM though didn't want to actually have to pay a set amount of money to anybody to maintain the fund and when the bill had to be paid and their pockets were empty they and their allies blamed the greed of the union. I could go on, but this post is getting long enough |
Richie-
You actually agreed with me on something? I am both happy and amazed. Let's try to keep it that way. |
Wisconsin union members
The real behind the scenes battle in Wisconsin for the teachers and public employees is not for the members but for lost union dues. More than $35,000,000 in dues from teachers alone and a large commission rake off on the union controlled health insurance plan which all goes to the fat cat leaders whose top salaries have been reported at from $380,000 to $250,000, and who knows what else they spend their millions on. When have you ever seen an audited report on the financials of a union, even if you belong to one?
Anyway, if the public workers aren't happy with the new order they can always quit and work for the ultra high union wages and benefits at Schlitz, Blatz, AC Delco, Delphi, Wisconsin Motors, Chrysler Engine Plant, GM Janesville Assembly Plant----oops, they all seem to have disappeared. |
to blame only the unions for the closures is simply not true.You paint this as a one-way street.Please do not forget corporate greed. You mention union salaries but what about corporate salaries and their golden parachutes? They dont share the blame? Heard someone say if you enjoy your weekends thank the unions. I want to thank them now. Unions have done far more for me than some million dollar CEO who runs a company into the ground then gets a million dollar severance package and on the way out the door has the audacity to blame the union.
|
Wasn't this about public unions? Which with teachers have been getting away with sticking it to the tax payers for years.Here in Il we once had a meeting with one of my sons teachers who couldn't teach we confronted her about this and she began to cry and say how she was their for the kids.Well we thought it would be best to drop the course,to do this we had to meet with the principal.He begged us to stay in the class and try to put up with her but gave in to are demand.he said his hands were tied and couldn't get rid of her.Today she is still at that school making about 125k a year and still worthless. In the public sector they just can't kid rid of the poor performers.
I have a friend of mine who is a union boss for rail road workers and he will not put up with any crap.If workers screw up he tells the rail road to fire them.He reasons they make about 100k they should work for it and if not goodbye.thats the way it should be in the public sector but here in chicago they all laugh of not doing any thing half the time I guess thats the chicago way let the tax payers pay. |
125k a year as a teacher??? I do not believe it.
|
Quote:
|
I'm telling you.. If it were possible to fire bad teachers, this would NEVER have become an issue.
|
CORRECT:BigApplause:
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:59 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Search Engine Optimisation provided by
DragonByte SEO v2.0.32 (Pro) -
vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2025 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.