Originally Posted by OrangeBlossomBaby (Post 2233603)

I read the hearing report from AP, and Sagan's original paper on the subject. I'm not seeing that he misled anyone. He gave his theory, supported it with the scientific data available at the time, and brought it to the most likely conclusion. That's what science is all about. You pose a question, do fact finding and data gathering, and attempt to answer the question.

There might be facts you don't know yet - information missing, new technology able to reveal things you would not have been capable of knowing previously. And so your answer might change. That doesn't make it misleading. It just makes it inaccurate. You can be wrong, and not be lying.

Originally Posted by sounding (Post 2234154)

There are over 100 glaciers that are growing. They are listed at Weather Club meetings.

Originally Posted by golfing eagles (Post 2234162)

How many times do I have to repeat it-----Don't confuse the zealots with the facts, it spoils the taste of their Kool-Aid. :1rotfl::1rotfl::1rotfl:

Originally Posted by sounding (Post 2234154)

There are over 100 glaciers that are growing. They are listed at Weather Club meetings.

Originally Posted by Taltarzac725 (Post 2234166)

I am busy chugging--
Some of Glacier National Park's glaciers have lost as much as 80% of their size in the last 50 years | CNN

Originally Posted by golfing eagles (Post 2234170)

I know , Tal. We really should go back to 3 word sentences or even the nothing thread :1rotfl::1rotfl::1rotfl:

Originally Posted by sounding (Post 2234156)

He testified to Congress that CO2 was the primary cause of Venus 900 F surface temperature. That was a lie - and he knew it - or he fell asleep during astrophysics class.

Originally Posted by OrangeBlossomBaby (Post 2233603)

I read the hearing report from AP, and Sagan's original paper on the subject. I'm not seeing that he misled anyone. He gave his theory, supported it with the scientific data available at the time, and brought it to the most likely conclusion. That's what science is all about. You pose a question, do fact finding and data gathering, and attempt to answer the question.

There might be facts you don't know yet - information missing, new technology able to reveal things you would not have been capable of knowing previously. And so your answer might change. That doesn't make it misleading. It just makes it inaccurate. You can be wrong, and not be lying.

Originally Posted by fdpaq0580 (Post 2234196)

You are right, but the climate change denier WEENIES don't want to hear it

Originally Posted by Chi-Town (Post 2234207)

Michio Kaku is the Carl Sagan of the now. Wonder what his views on global warming are.

Originally Posted by golfing eagles (Post 2234198)

Sorry, but the label "weenies" has already been taken and defined. Think of something original, and not what that moron Joy whatever on "the view" that calls it a "dee-nye-yah"

Originally Posted by golfing eagles (Post 2233770)

I think that might qualify as gulping down a double dose of Kool-Aid. Fortunately, most of that post is untrue

BTW, It's not the scientific community that is conspiring----It is the "powers that be", the ones that will profit from this nonsense. The scientists are merely their pawns, with a gun to their head, trying to survive professionally and financially since to state the truth results in suicide. And of course, the media is all too happy to aid them in pushing this false narrative.

Originally Posted by golfing eagles (Post 2234198)

Sorry, but the label "weenies" has already been taken and defined. Think of something original, and not what that moron Joy whatever on "the view" that calls it a "dee-nye-yah"

Originally Posted by two bills (Post 2234212)

"pricks" comes to mind. :1rotfl::1rotfl::1rotfl: :icon_wink: