![]() |
Quote:
Scientism Fails Another Defense (March 12, 2017 | David F. Coppedge) A physicist’s latest attempt to justify scientism reveals a deplorable ignorance of history, logic and philosophy of science. "Tom Solomon, astronomer and physicist at Bucknell University, makes a valiant attempt to defend scientism (the view that ‘science’ is exceptional and superior to any other search for knowledge). In his article on The Conversation, “Scientific theories aren’t mere conjecture – to survive they must work,” he begins by expressing his frustration at public distrust of Big Science. Etc. Etc." Interesting article. Might want to check it out. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
I find different data. |
Quote:
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
As far as the planet's warming goes........there are other considerations. The clear-cutting of old-growth forests is never GOOD even if small saplings are planted to replace them. The clear-cutting of the old-growth Amazon rainforest in Brazil is especially detrimental to the planet due to the sheer HUGE area involved. Forests and the oceans are the earth's mechanisms for removing from the atmosphere the large EXCESS CO2 produced by the vehicles burning fossil fuel. (as opposed to the cleaner system of Electric Vehicles) The earth's problem and by extension mankind's problem is the rapid destruction of forests and the acidification of the oceans. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
Today, in hindsight, the fact that the US has a good trading partner in Vietnam and has good diplomatic relations - sort of points out that Jane Fonda was on the right side of History. Personally, I think that she went too far when she physically visited North Vietnam. That was the bridge too far, I will agree. America is Historically famous for its GREAT debaters and its enshrining freedom of speech in its laws. There is the question of how much hate should be placed on the shoulders of people on the OTHER SIDE of ANY debate? |
Quote:
|
New York, Illinois, Maine, Maryland, California and Washington have banned pet sales of cats and dogs to reduce the carbon "paw print" they produce as a result of eating meat.
|
Quote:
|
The WEF World Economic Forum declared millions of cats and dogs should be slaughtered because they contribute to climate change.
|
Quote:
Ironically, there has been a cooling trend for the last seven years because there was a particularly HOT year at about that time. While recent years still show a warming trend, if you choose to start at a particularly HOT point then even warm years look cooler. With decades of data, you chose a point seven years ago because doing so showed what you wanted it to. Perhaps you didn’t notice that you chose an example of a warming climate to try to make your point that the climate is cooling… or maybe you thought no one would bother to look. The next dozen times when you trot out the question of the seven years, please include this post - it will save me the time and trouble of doing it myself. |
Quote:
For the life of me, I will never understand why so many people put such value on things said by people whose ONLY proven talent is making other people believe they're someone they're not. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
Only Pet Stores are banned from selling them, in an attempt to stop the "puppy mills"... Nothing to do with the "carbon paw print'... And that law is still being fought in the courts... |
Quote:
map of rising temperatures with that of today. I further believe that here in Florida we will be able to FEEL the increased summer HEAT in 5 years. |
Quote:
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:34 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Search Engine Optimisation provided by
DragonByte SEO v2.0.32 (Pro) -
vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2025 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.