Talk of The Villages Florida

Talk of The Villages Florida (https://www.talkofthevillages.com/forums/)
-   Weather Talk (https://www.talkofthevillages.com/forums/weather-talk-515/)
-   -   Climate Change v Global Warming (https://www.talkofthevillages.com/forums/weather-talk-515/climate-change-v-global-warming-337410/)

ThirdOfFive 12-17-2022 09:38 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Taltarzac725 (Post 2167287)

An opinion of an opinion. And like all such there are opinions that totally disagree with that of Mr. Solomon.

Scientism Fails Another Defense (March 12, 2017 | David F. Coppedge)

A physicist’s latest attempt to justify scientism reveals a deplorable ignorance of history, logic and philosophy of science.

"Tom Solomon, astronomer and physicist at Bucknell University, makes a valiant attempt to defend scientism (the view that ‘science’ is exceptional and superior to any other search for knowledge). In his article on The Conversation, “Scientific theories aren’t mere conjecture – to survive they must work,” he begins by expressing his frustration at public distrust of Big Science.

Etc. Etc."

Interesting article. Might want to check it out.

sounding 12-17-2022 09:44 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jimjamuser (Post 2167291)
I feel otherwise. The competitively large number of posts SIMPLY means that it is a worthwhile subject that many are interested in. Why say that a thread is NOT valuable when obviously the many posts prove otherwise? Many threads go only 2 pages, some just one. Does that make those threads more valuable? Certainly NOT. I have seen threads like "I would like to find someone to come and tune my piano, please help". These are the 2-page type. Should threads like that be kept off of a forum? Certainly NOT. But, it needs to be acknowledged that those types of threads are going to be interesting to ONLY a few people.
..........It seems to be intuitively obvious that a thread going 10 pages or more is good for the community.

As far as the criticism that basically no minds will be changed - that assumes that minds NEVER change and I can't believe that. Humans are flexible, minds are malleable. People click on a forum to take the pulse of their community. Opinions change as facts change. For example, OJ Simpson was a football hero and then he wasn't. That was NOT a GREAT example. Let's see.......opinions about the death penalty have changed over the years. Vietnam was a hateful enemy and now they are a reliable trading partner. Opinions about marriage have evolved.
........So, my thesis here is that DEBATE was a foundational building block in American History. Therefore a local community forum anywhere in the US should welcome debate.

Debate is good. Why has the earth been cooling for the past 7 years?

Taltarzac725 12-17-2022 09:49 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by sounding (Post 2167298)
Debate is good. Why has the earth been cooling for the past 7 years?

The last 7 years have been Earth'''s 7 hottest

I find different data.

Bill14564 12-17-2022 09:55 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by sounding (Post 2167298)
Debate is good. Why has the earth been cooling for the past 7 years?

Same question, same answer

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bill14564 (Post 2167195)
Look at the data, it shows warming for the last four. ONE cool year drawing down the average does not make a trend and cherry picking data does not make a convincing argument.

I should add that YOUR data also shows warming trends over 10 and 20 years. The 7 year mark is an interesting anomaly but certainly not a trend.

sounding 12-17-2022 09:57 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Taltarzac725 (Post 2167299)

Good try, but no. It's the same data, but from a different perspective. When you reach the top of mountain and then slowly start back down ... those downward steps are at relatively higher altitudes -- but they are still trending DOWN. And so, we'll see what happens in year 8. In the meantime, I'm enjoying this morning's global warming.

sounding 12-17-2022 09:59 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bill14564 (Post 2167302)
Same question, same answer



I should add that YOUR data also shows warming trends over 10 and 20 years. The 7 year mark is an interesting anomaly but certainly not a trend.

Science is full of anomalies. And the last 7 years shows a cooling trend -- both UAH satellite and NOAA surface data. Let's see what happens during year 8.

Bill14564 12-17-2022 10:10 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by sounding (Post 2167305)
Science is full of anomalies. And the last 7 years shows a cooling trend -- both UAH satellite and NOAA surface data. Let's see what happens during year 8.

My prediction: there may be a barely discernible cooling trend starting at the eight year mark but at the same time, the data will show a clear warming trend over five, eleven, and 21 years. You will have to do more cherry picking after that.

jimjamuser 12-17-2022 10:10 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Byte1 (Post 2167158)
Sorry, but that has not been proven.
Kinda like saying, if we have more trees it will cause more shade and make the world cooler. Or since we have so many airline flights every day, there is more wind.

This is NOT in ANY way critical of the post, merely an addition to it. Trees help keep the earth cool by providing shade and by evaporative cooling. Where water from the roots is drawn upward to the leaves by capillary action. It is pretty obvious that cities made up of concrete and DARK asphalt streets are warmer than their surrounding countryside. Also, it is why people in cities in the summer flock to parks for picnics and etc.

As far as the planet's warming goes........there are other considerations. The clear-cutting of old-growth forests is never GOOD even if small saplings are planted to replace them. The clear-cutting of the old-growth Amazon rainforest in Brazil is especially detrimental to the planet due to the sheer HUGE area involved.

Forests and the oceans are the earth's mechanisms for removing from the atmosphere the large EXCESS CO2 produced by the vehicles burning fossil fuel. (as opposed to the cleaner system of Electric Vehicles) The earth's problem and by extension mankind's problem is the rapid destruction of forests and the acidification of the oceans.

sounding 12-17-2022 10:23 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bill14564 (Post 2167309)
My prediction: there may be a barely discernible cooling trend starting at the eight year mark but at the same time, the data will show a clear warming trend over five, eleven, and 21 years. You will have to do more cherry picking after that.

What cherry-picking. Remember what Al Gore said ... we're at a tipping point. The question is ... which tipping point. Either way the questions still remains, which no one seems to know how to answer ... why has the earth been cooling for the past 7 years?

jimjamuser 12-17-2022 10:39 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Stu from NYC (Post 2167194)
Have no respect for anyone who would shake the hand of hanoi jane. She should have been tried and executed for treason, giving aid and comfort to our enemy.

I can understand why her mere name generates a lot of negative emotion. I would like to point out a few things. The Vietnam War was a long time ago. I was in the Air Force and I regularly read reports of how the war was going in Time magazine. The French were defeated by Vietnam, which was a bad sign. Another bad sign was that a considerable portion of the US citizens was against the war, which was different than WW2.

Today, in hindsight, the fact that the US has a good trading partner in Vietnam and has good diplomatic relations - sort of points out that Jane Fonda was on the right side of History. Personally, I think that she went too far when she physically visited North Vietnam. That was the bridge too far, I will agree.

America is Historically famous for its GREAT debaters and its enshrining freedom of speech in its laws. There is the question of how much hate should be placed on the shoulders of people on the OTHER SIDE of ANY debate?

jimjamuser 12-17-2022 11:08 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Taltarzac725 (Post 2167299)

Another "drop the mike" proof that the Earth has Global Warming and the article also says that the reason is man-made. How many of these articles must be posted to convince the 1% of Global Warming Deniers? To deny or not to deny, that is the question. I just worry that the truth is NOT reaching the average US person, that it is not talked about enough on the NORMAL TV stations, which allows the Climate Change deniers to influence public opinion through propaganda.

courtyard 12-17-2022 11:11 AM

New York, Illinois, Maine, Maryland, California and Washington have banned pet sales of cats and dogs to reduce the carbon "paw print" they produce as a result of eating meat.

Keefelane66 12-17-2022 11:26 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by courtyard (Post 2167326)
New York, Illinois, Maine, Maryland, California and Washington have banned pet sales of cats and dogs to reduce the carbon "paw print" they produce as a result of eating meat.

That’s a far stretch it’s laws to shut down “puppy mills” inhumane treatment of animals.

courtyard 12-17-2022 12:05 PM

The WEF World Economic Forum declared millions of cats and dogs should be slaughtered because they contribute to climate change.

Bill14564 12-17-2022 12:35 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by sounding (Post 2167316)
What cherry-picking. Remember what Al Gore said ... we're at a tipping point. The question is ... which tipping point. Either way the questions still remains, which no one seems to know how to answer ... why has the earth been cooling for the past 7 years?

Uggh, it just never ends…

Ironically, there has been a cooling trend for the last seven years because there was a particularly HOT year at about that time. While recent years still show a warming trend, if you choose to start at a particularly HOT point then even warm years look cooler.

With decades of data, you chose a point seven years ago because doing so showed what you wanted it to. Perhaps you didn’t notice that you chose an example of a warming climate to try to make your point that the climate is cooling… or maybe you thought no one would bother to look.

The next dozen times when you trot out the question of the seven years, please include this post - it will save me the time and trouble of doing it myself.

ThirdOfFive 12-17-2022 12:39 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jimjamuser (Post 2167321)
I can understand why her mere name generates a lot of negative emotion. I would like to point out a few things. The Vietnam War was a long time ago. I was in the Air Force and I regularly read reports of how the war was going in Time magazine. The French were defeated by Vietnam, which was a bad sign. Another bad sign was that a considerable portion of the US citizens was against the war, which was different than WW2.

Today, in hindsight, the fact that the US has a good trading partner in Vietnam and has good diplomatic relations - sort of points out that Jane Fonda was on the right side of History. Personally, I think that she went too far when she physically visited North Vietnam. That was the bridge too far, I will agree.

America is Historically famous for its GREAT debaters and its enshrining freedom of speech in its laws. There is the question of how much hate should be placed on the shoulders of people on the OTHER SIDE of ANY debate?

Heh. Jane Fonda. Just one of many vapid Hollywood pontificators.

For the life of me, I will never understand why so many people put such value on things said by people whose ONLY proven talent is making other people believe they're someone they're not.

sounding 12-17-2022 12:48 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bill14564 (Post 2167354)
Uggh, it just never ends…

Ironically, there has been a cooling trend for the last seven years because there was a particularly HOT year at about that time. While recent years still show a warming trend, if you choose to start at a particularly HOT point then even warm years look cooler.

With decades of data, you chose a point seven years ago because doing so showed what you wanted it to. Perhaps you didn’t notice that you chose an example of a warming climate to try to make your point that the climate is cooling… or maybe you thought no one would bother to look.

The next dozen times when you trot out the question of the seven years, please include this post - it will save me the time and trouble of doing it myself.

But there is a reason why the earth has been cooling for the past 7 years -- in terms of a linear trend. I'll check back next month to see if that trend continues.

Taltarzac725 12-17-2022 01:38 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bill14564 (Post 2167354)
Uggh, it just never ends…

Ironically, there has been a cooling trend for the last seven years because there was a particularly HOT year at about that time. While recent years still show a warming trend, if you choose to start at a particularly HOT point then even warm years look cooler.

With decades of data, you chose a point seven years ago because doing so showed what you wanted it to. Perhaps you didn’t notice that you chose an example of a warming climate to try to make your point that the climate is cooling… or maybe you thought no one would bother to look.

The next dozen times when you trot out the question of the seven years, please include this post - it will save me the time and trouble of doing it myself.

Good post.:popcorn:

Taltarzac725 12-17-2022 01:40 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ThirdOfFive (Post 2167355)
Heh. Jane Fonda. Just one of many vapid Hollywood pontificators.

For the life of me, I will never understand why so many people put such value on things said by people whose ONLY proven talent is making other people believe they're someone they're not.

Some of these actors have many businesses and many interests other than in just pretending to be someone else. And many are not attracted to the Hollywood scene but are happy in various local settings.

JMintzer 12-17-2022 01:48 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jimjamuser (Post 2167323)
Another "drop the mike" proof that the Earth has Global Warming and the article also says that the reason is man-made. How many of these articles must be posted to convince the 1% of Global Warming Deniers? To deny or not to deny, that is the question. I just worry that the truth is NOT reaching the average US person, that it is not talked about enough on the NORMAL TV stations, which allows the Climate Change deniers to influence public opinion through propaganda.

"The Truth"? Says you...

jimjamuser 12-17-2022 01:49 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by courtyard (Post 2167341)
The WEF World Economic Forum declared millions of cats and dogs should be slaughtered because they contribute to climate change.

I won't have a problem with dogs and cats increasing Global Warming UNTIL someone teaches them how to drive a car. I also believe that most dog and cat food consists of plant protein and a little bit of normally wasted animal fat added. I believe that the positive companionship features of dogs and cats far outweigh their small carbon footprint. If it were true that dogs and cats should be eliminated, then wild raccoons, coyotes, bears, possums, foxes, and lynxes should also be eliminated - that would be impossible! This concept about dogs and cats seems to have lost something in translation. Or at least is an exaggeration.

JMintzer 12-17-2022 01:52 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by courtyard (Post 2167326)
New York, Illinois, Maine, Maryland, California and Washington have banned pet sales of cats and dogs to reduce the carbon "paw print" they produce as a result of eating meat.

Not true. In MD, they are stilled allowed to be sold by their "original breeders"...

Only Pet Stores are banned from selling them, in an attempt to stop the "puppy mills"... Nothing to do with the "carbon paw print'...

And that law is still being fought in the courts...

jimjamuser 12-17-2022 02:19 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by sounding (Post 2167357)
But there is a reason why the earth has been cooling for the past 7 years -- in terms of a linear trend. I'll check back next month to see if that trend continues.

I think that this debate will be resolved in about 3 to 5 years by looking back and comparing the number and strength of the KILLER Hurricanes hitting the US. Comparing the amount of ocean rise and the acidic content. Comparing the cost and difficulty of obtaining home insurance in Florida. Comparing the rate of species extinctions with today. Comparing the Gulf of Mexico's highest temperature with that of today. Comparing a world
map of rising temperatures with that of today. I further believe that here in Florida we will be able to FEEL the increased summer HEAT in 5 years.

golfing eagles 12-17-2022 04:44 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jimjamuser (Post 2167380)
I think that this debate will be resolved in about 3 to 5 years by looking back and comparing the number and strength of the KILLER Hurricanes hitting the US. Comparing the amount of ocean rise and the acidic content. Comparing the cost and difficulty of obtaining home insurance in Florida. Comparing the rate of species extinctions with today. Comparing the Gulf of Mexico's highest temperature with that of today. Comparing a world
map of rising temperatures with that of today. I further believe that here in Florida we will be able to FEEL the increased summer HEAT in 5 years.

Well, feel free to go right on believing that. It's not going to happen, but in a free country I'll defend your right to believe any fantasy you want. Now, if you will, please explain how hurricanes (a WEATHER event), homeowner's insurance (a business decision), extinctions and speciation (which have been going on for over a billion years), and the temperature of a small body of water in comparison to the total oceans on Earth have the slightest bearing on CLIMATE change cycles over the last 4 million years. Yep, same old, same old......


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:34 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Search Engine Optimisation provided by DragonByte SEO v2.0.32 (Pro) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2025 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.