Talk of The Villages Florida

Talk of The Villages Florida (https://www.talkofthevillages.com/forums/)
-   Weather Talk (https://www.talkofthevillages.com/forums/weather-talk-515/)
-   -   Global Warming. Really? (https://www.talkofthevillages.com/forums/weather-talk-515/global-warming-really-345385/)

sounding 12-01-2023 06:03 PM

1 Attachment(s)
Quote:

Originally Posted by biker1 (Post 2278835)
Subscribe to the AMS Journal of Climate, a peer reviewed journal. Read AR6, the summaries are sufficient. Ignore politicians, talking heads, and anyone those who takes an extreme positions such as the world will end soon and there isn't any anthropogenic warming.

Legitimate climate peer-review is a myth following climategate.

biker1 12-01-2023 06:11 PM

Exactly how many peer reviewed papers do you have in AMS Journals?

Quote:

Originally Posted by sounding (Post 2278836)
Legitimate climate peer-review is a myth following climategate.


mtdjed 12-01-2023 09:19 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Randall55 (Post 2273787)
It's early in the season, but Anchorage Alaska has already seen record breaking amounts of snowfall. Some areas, surrounding the city, accumulated two feet within two days. A snow emergency has been declared. Is El Niño the cause? Do you think the scientists who support the theory of global warming are staring at their monitors in disbelief? Strange thing, I did not see this reported on the news as often as this summer's record breaking heat. Any thoughts on why?

Here we go again! It's colder today therefore, global warming is defunct. It's hotter today, therefore it proves global warming, Get ready for all of the village experts and another barrage of waisted time.

sounding 12-01-2023 09:34 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by mtdjed (Post 2278853)
Here we go again! It's colder today therefore, global warming is defunct. It's hotter today, therefore it proves global warming, Get ready for all of the village experts and another barrage of waisted time.

Ok, stop wasting time ... how much did man-made CO2 warm the earth last year?

margaretmattson 12-01-2023 11:19 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by mtdjed (Post 2278853)
Here we go again! It's colder today therefore, global warming is defunct. It's hotter today, therefore it proves global warming, Get ready for all of the village experts and another barrage of waisted time.

OP stated nothing about cold weather. Increased precipitation is a result of global warming. This includes an abundance of snow fall.

biker1 12-02-2023 07:42 AM

Not exactly. The impact of warmer lower tropospheric temperatures is increased precipitation in some areas and decreased precipitation in other areas. With warmer temperatures, you will realize increased evaporation. This will increase the amount of water in the atmosphere (and available to rain out) but also increase drying in other areas. So far, anthropogenic warming has been mild; estimated at about 1C for the global surface temperature anomaly. Projected anthropogenic warming increases over the rest of the century will likely cause increased variability in precipitation.

Quote:

Originally Posted by margaretmattson (Post 2278866)
OP stated nothing about cold weather. Increased precipitation is a result of global warming. This includes an abundance of snow fall.


sounding 12-02-2023 08:44 AM

1 Attachment(s)
Quote:

Originally Posted by biker1 (Post 2278905)
Not exactly. The impact of warmer lower tropospheric temperatures is increased precipitation in some areas and decreased precipitation in other areas. With warmer temperatures, you will realize increased evaporation. This will increase the amount of water in the atmosphere (and available to rain out) but also increase drying in other areas. So far, anthropogenic warming has been mild; estimated at about 1C for the global surface temperature anomaly. Projected anthropogenic warming increases over the rest of the century will likely cause increased variability in precipitation.

"1C" warming via man-made CO2 is not a fact ... but we do know that we are still thawing out from the Little Ice Age regardless of what we do.

fdpaq0580 12-02-2023 09:14 AM

One thing is certain, there is a lot of hot air being created by this debate.

biker1 12-02-2023 09:16 AM

Your lack of understanding is remarkable. There has been some natural warming because we are in an interglacial period. We know there has been anthropogenic warming because of our understanding of radiative transfer physics and analysis of real data. The signature is quite clear from observations of stratospheric cooling and lower tropospheric warming, that matches Manabe's theory from 45 years ago. As I stated, the best estimate of anthropogenic warming is about 1C. The fact that you don't believe it is inconsequential. You may wish to actually try reading the AR6 instead of pulling up some graphic from 30 years ago that actually has nothing to do with anthropogenic warming.


Quote:

Originally Posted by sounding (Post 2278943)
"1C" warming via man-made CO2 is not a fact ... but we do know that we are still thawing out from the Little Ice Age regardless of what we do.


fdpaq0580 12-02-2023 09:21 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by biker1 (Post 2278958)
Your lack of understanding is remarkable. There has been some warming because we are in an interglacial period. We know there has been anthropogenic warming because of our understanding of radiative transfer physics. As I stated, the best estimate of anthropogenic warming is about 1C. The fact that you don't believe it is inconsequential.

Between you and me, I think he knows but just likes to argue.

sounding 12-02-2023 11:00 AM

1 Attachment(s)
Quote:

Originally Posted by biker1 (Post 2278958)
Your lack of understanding is remarkable. There has been some natural warming because we are in an interglacial period. We know there has been anthropogenic warming because of our understanding of radiative transfer physics and analysis of real data. The signature is quite clear from observations of stratospheric cooling and lower tropospheric warming, that matches Manabe's theory from 45 years ago. As I stated, the best estimate of anthropogenic warming is about 1C. The fact that you don't believe it is inconsequential. You may wish to actually try reading the AR6 instead of pulling up some graphic from 30 years ago that actually has nothing to do with anthropogenic warming.

You can claim to be a wizard, or man created the 1C change ... but without proof you only have wishful thinking. CO2 is not a control knob - as history clearly shows.

biker1 12-02-2023 11:05 AM

Feel free to continue your membership in the Flat Earth Society. Still waiting to hear how many peer reviewed AMS journal papers you have published. By the way, I can always tell when someone can't support their argument. They resort to strawman arguments and then say "you can't prove it". In reality, few things are actually provable. For example, F=MA cannot be proven. There is a large body of data to suggest that it is essentially correct. The same thing applies to the Navier-Stokes equations. $1M awaits anyone who can prove a solution exists. Regardless, the N-S equations have been shown to be accurate for a variety of applications. The body of evidence supporting anthropogenic warming is large and has withstood critical examination.

Quote:

Originally Posted by sounding (Post 2279006)
You can claim to be a wizard, or man created the 1C change ... but without proof you only have wishful thinking. CO2 is not a control knob - as history clearly shows.


Dusty_Star 12-02-2023 11:09 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by OrangeBlossomBaby (Post 2273887)
Also when the temperature drops below 0°F for a few days in a row, you'll rarely see snow. In Alaska, it's pretty common to have 0-degree temps this time of year. The fact that it's snowing in record amounts means - it is WARM enough to snow, when normally it would not be.



"Can it be too cold to snow? It can snow when it’s very cold. As a matter of fact, snow can fall even in the coldest places on Earth, such as Antarctica, where temperatures are well below zero."

-EarthSky.org

biker1 12-02-2023 01:44 PM

The reason you don't often see snow with cold temperatures is because the cold temperatures are often associated with the subsidence behind a low pressure system - that is where the cold air is typically. However, low pressure systems, which create rising motion ahead of where they are tracking, can and do exist in what you consider to be cold air. For snow, you need rising motion, some moisture, and cold enough temperatures. The amount of moisture that the air can hold is exponentially related to temperature so warmer air has greater potential for higher snow amounts. However, low pressure centers can create a large amount of moisture convergence even with what you would consider to be low temperatures.


Originally Posted by OrangeBlossomBaby View Post
Also when the temperature drops below 0°F for a few days in a row, you'll rarely see snow. In Alaska, it's pretty common to have 0-degree temps this time of year. The fact that it's snowing in record amounts means - it is WARM enough to snow, when normally it would not be.





Quote:

Originally Posted by Dusty_Star (Post 2279013)
"Can it be too cold to snow? It can snow when it’s very cold. As a matter of fact, snow can fall even in the coldest places on Earth, such as Antarctica, where temperatures are well below zero."

-EarthSky.org


sounding 12-02-2023 02:58 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by biker1 (Post 2279010)
Feel free to continue your membership in the Flat Earth Society. Still waiting to hear how many peer reviewed AMS journal papers you have published. By the way, I can always tell when someone can't support their argument. They resort to strawman arguments and then say "you can't prove it". In reality, few things are actually provable. For example, F=MA cannot be proven. There is a large body of data to suggest that it is essentially correct. The same thing applies to the Navier-Stokes equations. $1M awaits anyone who can prove a solution exists. Regardless, the N-S equations have been shown to be accurate for a variety of applications. The body of evidence supporting anthropogenic warming is large and has withstood critical examination.

Then show the body of evidence ... peer-reviewed proof of how much man-made CO2 warmed the earth last year.


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:39 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Search Engine Optimisation provided by DragonByte SEO v2.0.32 (Pro) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2025 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.