Not hard at all. You just have to pick them out from the avalanche of nonsense promoting the myth of anthropogenic global warming.

Global warming is not a theory - it's reality - it's been warming and cooling via many cycles for billions of years. We are currently under the influence of warming and cooling cycles, but the net result of those cycles is a very slow warming trend as we continue to thaw out from the Little Ice Age ... which is expected to continue for about another 100 years or so. Find out why at the Weather Club ... The Villages Weather Club

Sounds like there is little, possibly questionable, evidence sprinkled amongst a mountain of factual evidence of anthropogenic global warming.
We (humans) didn’t start global warming, but we absolutely have contributed to it. We most certainly have done nothing to hold it back.

Claims about man-made global warming are fun to make up ... but actual data is much better. So ... how much did man-made CO2 warm the earth last year?

Mainstream media certainly has a lot of catching up to do with Ailes. Fox "News" had agreed to pay Dominion Voting Systems $787,000,000 to settle a defamation lawsuit concerning all the lies Fox promoted against them during the 2020 election. Fox promoted these lies in order not to lose viewers who only watch "news" outlets that reinforce their beliefs.

So ... how much did naysayers hogwash cool the earth last year?

Oh, the answer to your question is, combined with other human "contributions", @ .07 degrees C.

Please provide "the science" (as we are all told to follow) that produces the .07 C value.

I know next to nothing about coral reefs so I did a quick search on 'coral reef thriving'. Articles abound of areas where reefs are thriving.

Fear mongering to promote a hidden agenda? Oh, sorry, We all know that never happens......

If only science was that simple.

Facts: Large areas of coral reefs have died off;; large areas are now again covered by coral.

Nearly everything beyond that is just some conclusion drawn from two data points. No investigation into why the coral died. Not investigation into what changed that the coral can now recover. No data on whether the coral that has recovered is substantially the same as what was lost.

A lightning strike causes a fire that destroys hundreds of acres of old-growth forest. Twenty years later the area is covered with healthy pines. Since the area is again covered with trees does that prove that lightning doesn't destroy forests? Can we say there were trees before and there are trees now so nothing really happened, the trees just changed their clothes?

Science just isn't that simple.

It's a shame that underwater volcanoes erupt and warm the oceans so much. Too bad man can't control volcanoes like they control the climate..............:1rotfl:

“Mainstream media” will never catch up!

In (another) stroke of brilliance, when Ailes created FOX NEWS he made sure it was on cable-only (not to be confused with FOX Entertainment which airs locally and has the Simpsons, etc.) so FOX NEWS is NOT constrained by the FCC and the Frankfurter (SCOTUS 1943) ruling that allow the federal government to meddle in on-air stations operations.

Frankfurter--“This ruling cleared the way for the FCC to regulate networks indirectly by banning licenses to individual stations that contract with networks engaged in practices considered detrimental to the public interest.“

FOX NEWS is free of the FCC public interest requirements that apply to NBC, ABC, CBS, etc. – the on-air entities. He knew (even back then) that cable was the future. He was a visionary. If you notice on-air talent reports “others are saying” and quote/echo “other” sources. Ailes freed them from the burden to investigate on his dime. Smart man. He was a businessman to the core.

There are five major recognized journalism awards. FOX NEWS has never won an Emmy, Edward R. Murrow, DuPont/Columbia, Peabody or Pulitzer. MTV and Nickelodeon have one each. Roger did not care on bit. He didn’t need them. Why fight for viewers with three other networks (forget CNN—they were newcomers) when you can groom your own loyal audience?

He is comparable to Elon Musk who had the vision, the courage and the money to step up while NASA and Boeing were failing to fill the need.

FOX is commentary/opinion—they do not purport to report news (see Dominion Voting defense) . He packed the programming/commentary with Glen Beck, Megan Kelly, Bill O’Reilly, Gretchen Carlson, Chris Wallace, Jeanine Pirro, Ed Henry, Tucker Carlson, Eric Bolling, and Sean Hannity. All talented audience builders. Ailes never needed it to be a “news” station. He saw a lucrative future while mainstream media was blind During its startup FOX PAID $11 per month to get cable companies to carry the station. (Most providers are compensated for carrying their content) FOX used Rudi Guiliani to step in as the mayor to make Time Warner carry the FOX NEWS channel in NYC. He played hardball and was genius-what companies PAY cable providers to carry THEIR channel. FOX NEWS has exceeded his expectations.

FOX NEWS had revenues exceeding $3B (with a “B”) in the last quarter of 2023. What other venue can come even close to this measure of success?

The so-called main-stream entities are lost in space—they can’t compete with Roger’s genius.

You asked that same question many many times. Now you have your answer. But that isn't good enough. You want others to jump through hoops of your choosing to give you answers you will deny because the truth doesn't fit your narrative. I did some work and came up with that answer. You want my answer and my work. You are like the kid in school who cheated off others test answers. Do your own research if you can and get your own answers instead of relying upon others who spin a narrative that says what you want to hear. By the way, my figure was many decimal places long. What I gave you was an appropriate figure.
Good luck. I wish you every success.

Don't forget the surface volcanoes. They are doing there part. Volcanic activity has been a part of Earth's evolution since the world began. Human caused destruction, pollution, deforestation, burning fossil fuel and even wood, mining, etc, is in addition to the Earth's natural heating/cooling cycles. And Human caused changes have been documented and tested and there are direct correlations that prove Human industrial activity exacerbates global warming. The truth is out there. Seek and ye shall find. Or not.

Appropriate? Just try inserting an "appropriate" trajectory (without a science based formula) into a rocket designed to land on Mars. The reason you can't provide a science-based answer to man-made CO2 warming is becase the main stream media refuses to provide it. Guess why.

If the truth is out there -- please provide it. How much did man-made CO2 warm the earth last year? Or any year?

Which. completely negates your claim that "You can double check what are facts using the internet rather easily"...

I (and many others) have posted those facts, multiple times, with only a modicum of time "searching the internet"...

I think we should all move to another part of the world to "old back" and possibly even "reverse" the ever changing tilt of the earth's axis in it's orbit...

Everybody Drink! But I do find it interesting that many of the prevoius claims that were deemed "lies" are now being shown to be true...

Those forest fires are needed to maintain the healthy forests.

Once they get too big, those "old growth trees" begin to choke out the undergrowth (not enough sunlight gets thru) and it does, leaving behind excellent kinding for a forest fire.

Once a fire burns the old growth threes, their seed post release new seeds (they need the fire to release the seeds), and the cycle begins anew...

Coral reefs die. Later, they are replaced by healthy new reefs... The cycle of life continues...

Same with the under water oil spills. The earth "farts" up millions of gallons of oil every year...

We really need to fix this. Maybe spending a few $Trillion$ would help...

Good thing that neither CNN nor MSNBC did the exact same thing... Wait, what?

As to your "Emmy" comment, take two seconds and ponder who exactly runs and selects the Emmy nomination and votes for the winners...

Humans are but a gnat on the Earth's @ss in the grand scheme of things...

More like ticks that carry diseases, or beetles that can devastate woodlands. Or flea that carries plague. Maybe not an insect, but a single algae that blooms and poisons ocean waters.
Remember, friend, we are the "gnat" that invented the atomic bomb. Over 8 Billion of industrial "gnats" can move mountains and reshape the earth. And, we have. Give your species the credit we deserve.

To your "devastate woodlands" comment: "The United States has more trees today than we had 100 years ago (and a global study even found that the number of trees on Earth is around 3.04 trillion, a much higher number than previously believed.) The United States is the world's largest consumer (and second largest producer, after Canada) of forest products."

And this Blue Marble will be alive and well long after all humans are nothing but dust...

Look again, friend. Since 1900 the world has lost forest area the size off the U. S., the same size forest area was lost over the previous 9000 years. Can't see the forest for the lack of trees. Huge swaths of old growth forests, the forests that best produced oxygen, have been laid waste to make room for farms/ranches and plantations like coffee and other poor/low oxygen producers. Yeah, we destroy the good and replace it with poor. If that were the only[/B] damage we did. But it isn't.
Oh, that's right you only site U.S. and Canada, but the problem is a global one. And the state of the Canadian and U.S. forests owes a lot to those tree huggers and the protection and regulations they got passed to replant forests and selective logging to keep the land healthy for regrowth. Left to their own devices, the loggers would have raped the land and left it bare and lifeless. Then you wouldn't have been able to say how great our forests are, cause there wouldn't be any.
As to the Big Blue Marble. Let's hope you are correct about it being well. But wrong about humans turned to dust. Let us hope our species lives long and prospers because we learned our lesson and quit acting blind and arrogant.

Boats do not cause widespread whitening of the corals. Grew up on SE Florida coast and scuba dived frequently in the 80's. Stopped for 30+ years went back and saw huge changes, none of which was caused by boats

20 years ago went to the Mendenhall GLacier in Alaska and went back. Personally saw a huge difference. Saw photos in the Visitor Center and their photos showed a huge difference.

With all the hype and fear-mongering, I see more and more people enjoying our wonderful climate - golfing - pickleballing - cruising - dancing - swimming - etc etc etc. JMintzer understands too. JMintzer for Climate Czar.

We can only control what happens in the US. Which is why I SPECIFICALLY mentioned the US in my FACTUAL statement...

And we'll all be wiped out by a virus one day. Either naturally or man made...

I'm betting on the latter...

Our grandkids, great grandkids, and great great grandchildren and their offspring will have to deal with our reckless stupidity of not taking global warming seriously.

As expected. But that has absolutely nothing to do with human activity

Global warming is indeed serious -- it happens every time the sun's Bray and Eddy solar cycles are in their warming cycles -- like today -- and I'm loving it. The dangerous part is when those solar cycles turn into their cooling cycles -- because cold is the big killer. PS ... the Tonga volcano is causing this year's heat wave -- which will continue many more months.

Actually, it does. Since human activity has played a part in exacerbating/accelerating global warming, we are part of the global warming equation.
If you are unable to comprehend our true level of involvement, just consider human industrialization as the (8,000,000,000) straws that broke the camel's back.

Making climate claims is fun, but delivering data is the scientific way. So, according to your global warming equation ... how much did "man-made" CO2 warm the earth last year?

Well, you've challenged him with that question at least 3 dozen times and have received crickets in return. The true believers don't care about the facts, only following their propaganda masters talking points. They fail to realize that their masters have a significant monetary agenda that they are pursuing. The sad part is that those masters simply consider their followers "useful idiots".

That same old saw? This time, for a change, why don't you do the research and just give us your finding instead of asking for others here to do it for you, over and over and over. I gave you the answer once, and you keep asking.

In a civil society, the accuser has the burden of proof. I did not say man-made CO2 harms our climate - you did. You gave an answer, but without the science of how it was produced. Guessing, like palm reading, is fun, but the scientific method is preferred. Remember, our climate leaders keep telling us to follow the science. So, please show us the science you used to arrive at your answer.

Way more than 3 dozen times. And not just me. Crickets? Because it is a stupid question and we all know that it is. And it's a red herring to divert the dialog with meaningless nonsense.
Also, I did give him a answer! The, he wanted my research. If I can do the work, he can too. Don't cheat off my answer sheet.
And, as far as "useful idiots" is concerned, that is just what some guy said about his followers at some gathering recently. But that is for another time and place.
I think we can expect to see the CO2 question again and again in the future.
Have a great trip! 🙂🙂🙂

I have asked this question well over 1,000 times over the past 2 years -- on YouTube, Twitter, and now X -- and while I've received numerous responses (guesses), no one has ever been able to provide the "science" which defines GHG warming - even though the UN's IPCC uses this science in all their climate models. The media leadership knows the answer, but they refuse to print the story - because it destroys the climate narrative and exposes the climate scam. This "science" is discussed at the Weather Club, and is frequently presented in "CO2 Coalition" articles.

The work is there for all to see. Just follow real science and you will find it. People who work for things appreciate it more than those who are given things. You can read the journals as easy as I. For your own good you must do the work. Our you can continue ridicule, doubt and deny and trust your magic 8 ball or guru
Wishing you success.