That same old saw? This time, for a change, why don't you do the research and just give us your finding instead of asking for others here to do it for you, over and over and over. I gave you the answer once, and you keep asking.

In a civil society, the accuser has the burden of proof. I did not say man-made CO2 harms our climate - you did. You gave an answer, but without the science of how it was produced. Guessing, like palm reading, is fun, but the scientific method is preferred. Remember, our climate leaders keep telling us to follow the science. So, please show us the science you used to arrive at your answer.

Way more than 3 dozen times. And not just me. Crickets? Because it is a stupid question and we all know that it is. And it's a red herring to divert the dialog with meaningless nonsense.
Also, I did give him a answer! The, he wanted my research. If I can do the work, he can too. Don't cheat off my answer sheet.
And, as far as "useful idiots" is concerned, that is just what some guy said about his followers at some gathering recently. But that is for another time and place.
I think we can expect to see the CO2 question again and again in the future.
Have a great trip! 🙂🙂🙂

I have asked this question well over 1,000 times over the past 2 years -- on YouTube, Twitter, and now X -- and while I've received numerous responses (guesses), no one has ever been able to provide the "science" which defines GHG warming - even though the UN's IPCC uses this science in all their climate models. The media leadership knows the answer, but they refuse to print the story - because it destroys the climate narrative and exposes the climate scam. This "science" is discussed at the Weather Club, and is frequently presented in "CO2 Coalition" articles.

The work is there for all to see. Just follow real science and you will find it. People who work for things appreciate it more than those who are given things. You can read the journals as easy as I. For your own good you must do the work. Our you can continue ridicule, doubt and deny and trust your magic 8 ball or guru
Wishing you success.

Yes, the "real science" that you happen to agree with...

Hand-waving is not science. If your number was produced by real science, please provide that scientific method you used.

A famous person once quipped “The bigger the lie, the more people will believe it”. His first name was Adolph.

He had an audience of extremely gullible people who believed they were chosen by destiny to lead for a thousand years, etc. And his detractors were often murdered.

There were not many voices questioning that man. And if someone did they would be on the next train to oblivion.

Good luck, and I mean that sincerely. I tried for a while but gave up some time ago.