Seven Years of Global Temperature Data

Closed Thread
Thread Tools
  #16  
Old 11-05-2022, 02:48 PM
sounding sounding is offline
Veteran member
Join Date: Nov 2016
Location: Calumet Grove
Posts: 877
Thanks: 507
Thanked 748 Times in 466 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Byte1 View Post
Whether it gets warmer or colder, it's gonna happen whether man inhabits the earth or not.
Ditto -- and the best part is that CO2 helps make the earth greener and helps keep the earth comfortable for humans ... we are after all tropical life forms since we were born without fur. Man-made CO2 is helping to make our climate great again.
  #17  
Old 11-05-2022, 02:52 PM
sounding sounding is offline
Veteran member
Join Date: Nov 2016
Location: Calumet Grove
Posts: 877
Thanks: 507
Thanked 748 Times in 466 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Taltarzac725 View Post
What do witches have to do with global warming? The science is there. Persecuting witches was a widespread abuse of power and had little to do with facts.
"Had little to do with facts" is exactly right -- just like today. The facts are so little that no one can identify how much "man-made" CO2 warmed the earth last year.
  #18  
Old 11-05-2022, 03:43 PM
Bill14564 Bill14564 is offline
Sage
Join Date: Nov 2020
Location: Village of Hillsborough
Posts: 4,876
Thanks: 1,304
Thanked 5,382 Times in 2,061 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by sounding View Post
I already provided the Roy Spencer graph source -- nothing to hide here. Besides, there is no cherry-picking. I simply plotted all January through October temperature data from 2015 to 2022. Where is the cherry picking? When the November data comes in, I will plot that data -- and then subsequently for the December data ... a very simple straight forward process. And over the last 8 years of data, it shows a 7-year slight cooling trend.
Why show only seven years? Seven seems like a strange number to choose. What would the graph look like if you showed 4 or 10 or 20 years?
__________________
Why do people insist on making claims without looking them up first, do they really think no one will check? Proof by emphatic assertion rarely works.
Confirmation bias is real; I can find any number of articles that say so.


Victor, NY
Randallstown, MD
Yakima, WA
Stevensville, MD
Village of Hillsborough
  #19  
Old 11-05-2022, 03:56 PM
Taltarzac725's Avatar
Taltarzac725 Taltarzac725 is offline
Sage
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 49,362
Thanks: 9,418
Thanked 3,316 Times in 2,053 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bill14564 View Post
Why show only seven years? Seven seems like a strange number to choose. What would the graph look like if you showed 4 or 10 or 20 years?
It should show a good length of years.
  #20  
Old 11-05-2022, 04:01 PM
sounding sounding is offline
Veteran member
Join Date: Nov 2016
Location: Calumet Grove
Posts: 877
Thanks: 507
Thanked 748 Times in 466 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bill14564 View Post
Why show only seven years? Seven seems like a strange number to choose. What would the graph look like if you showed 4 or 10 or 20 years?
Because that's when the cooling trend began -- and now we wait and see what happens next ...
  #21  
Old 11-05-2022, 04:10 PM
Bill14564 Bill14564 is offline
Sage
Join Date: Nov 2020
Location: Village of Hillsborough
Posts: 4,876
Thanks: 1,304
Thanked 5,382 Times in 2,061 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by sounding View Post
Because that's when the cooling trend began -- and now we wait and see what happens next ...
You picked the starting point so as to show the desired trend? Isn't that just a bit dishonest?

BTW: The 4, 10, and 20 year charts all show a warming trend. Perhaps the cooling trend lasted only three years and now we are back in warming?
__________________
Why do people insist on making claims without looking them up first, do they really think no one will check? Proof by emphatic assertion rarely works.
Confirmation bias is real; I can find any number of articles that say so.


Victor, NY
Randallstown, MD
Yakima, WA
Stevensville, MD
Village of Hillsborough
  #22  
Old 11-05-2022, 04:25 PM
sounding sounding is offline
Veteran member
Join Date: Nov 2016
Location: Calumet Grove
Posts: 877
Thanks: 507
Thanked 748 Times in 466 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bill14564 View Post
You picked the starting point so as to show the desired trend? Isn't that just a bit dishonest?

BTW: The 4, 10, and 20 year charts all show a warming trend. Perhaps the cooling trend lasted only three years and now we are back in warming?
I picked the point at which slight global cooling started. This cooling is partially due to increasing incursions of polar outbreaks, accompanied by a cooling ENSO and PDO. This is why the hurricane trend has been decreasing for the past 2 years. Data also shows a weakening polar vortex, which is commonly indicative of more polar outbreaks to come -- at least in the near future.
  #23  
Old 11-05-2022, 04:59 PM
fdpaq0580 fdpaq0580 is online now
Sage
Join Date: Sep 2012
Posts: 3,805
Thanks: 340
Thanked 3,653 Times in 1,496 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Byte1 View Post
Whether it gets warmer or colder, it's gonna happen whether man inhabits the earth or not.
But it wouldn't be the same with out us. 👀
  #24  
Old 11-05-2022, 06:27 PM
BrianL99 BrianL99 is offline
Platinum member
Join Date: Dec 2021
Posts: 1,792
Thanks: 225
Thanked 2,032 Times in 726 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by tuccillo View Post
Again, 7 years is not a trend. If you want to consider 40 years then perhaps it is worth a look. So, please stop, you are embarrassing yourself. How are you doing on learning what a logarithm is?
Surely you've heard the phrase: "The Emperor has no clothes"?

You're embarrassing yourself.

Instead of worrying about meaningless logarithms, look up the word "trend" in the dictionary and learn what it means. You're surely not the arbiter of how long something must exist before it qualifies as a "trend".
  #25  
Old 11-05-2022, 06:32 PM
Robbb Robbb is offline
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2021
Posts: 300
Thanks: 103
Thanked 383 Times in 137 Posts
Default

More proof of global warming.
  #26  
Old 11-05-2022, 06:33 PM
sounding sounding is offline
Veteran member
Join Date: Nov 2016
Location: Calumet Grove
Posts: 877
Thanks: 507
Thanked 748 Times in 466 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by fdpaq0580 View Post
But it wouldn't be the same with out us. 👀
Fortunately, humans are helping to improve earth's climate by adding more CO2 to the air. It's odd that so many believe CO2 to be a satanic gas -- and yet no one even knows how much "man-made" CO2 warmed the earth last year. We all know exactly how much CO2 increased last year, or how much gasoline prices increased last year -- but not how much "man-made" CO2 increased earth's temperature. Think about that. Why is that not known? What is the news media hiding - besides the 7-year cooling trend? The answer is available through the use of a globally recognized equation which was created by the world's greatest scientists (including Einstein's contributions). This equation is publicly accessible via a computer program created by the US Government, which accurately describes (to the best of human knowledge) how CO2 and all other greenhouses gases affect our atmosphere. For those who don't know this equation or the program that runs it ... they will be discussed Nov 17 at 1:30 PM at Laurel Manor.
  #27  
Old 11-05-2022, 07:23 PM
fdpaq0580 fdpaq0580 is online now
Sage
Join Date: Sep 2012
Posts: 3,805
Thanks: 340
Thanked 3,653 Times in 1,496 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by sounding View Post
Fortunately, humans are helping to improve earth's climate by adding more CO2 to the air. It's odd that so many believe CO2 to be a satanic gas -- and yet no one even knows how much "man-made" CO2 warmed the earth last year. We all know exactly how much CO2 increased last year, or how much gasoline prices increased last year -- but not how much "man-made" CO2 increased earth's temperature. Think about that. Why is that not known? What is the news media hiding - besides the 7-year cooling trend? The answer is available through the use of a globally recognized equation which was created by the world's greatest scientists (including Einstein's contributions). This equation is publicly accessible via a computer program created by the US Government, which accurately describes (to the best of human knowledge) how CO2 and all other greenhouses gases affect our atmosphere. For those who don't know this equation or the program that runs it ... they will be discussed Nov 17 at 1:30 PM at Laurel Manor.
I'm sure it would be very interesting, but I will not be attending due to prior engagement. Enjoy!
  #28  
Old 11-05-2022, 09:09 PM
sounding sounding is offline
Veteran member
Join Date: Nov 2016
Location: Calumet Grove
Posts: 877
Thanks: 507
Thanked 748 Times in 466 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by fdpaq0580 View Post
I'm sure it would be very interesting, but I will not be attending due to prior engagement. Enjoy!
And this information will also be presented on Nov 14 at 1PM at Bridgeport.
  #29  
Old 11-06-2022, 04:37 AM
nick demis nick demis is offline
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2020
Posts: 406
Thanks: 144
Thanked 589 Times in 210 Posts
Default

If you look at 5, 10 or100 year charts you are not looking at a true representation of what is taking place. Looking at 10,000, 100,000 year or greater duration charts to find out where we are in the climate cycle. Then you will see how little humans have on the changing climate.
  #30  
Old 11-06-2022, 05:09 AM
Cmacnair@hotmail.com Cmacnair@hotmail.com is offline
Junior Member
Join Date: Jun 2020
Posts: 14
Thanks: 15
Thanked 5 Times in 5 Posts
Default

Whatever you do, please do not confuse our U.S. climate czar with the fax’s.
Closed Thread

Tags
trend, data, global, slight, years


You are viewing a new design of the TOTV site. Click here to revert to the old version.

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:02 PM.