Originally Posted by Guest

Maybe I'm missing something, what makes Carly a reasonable candidate for POTUS. She is clearly bright and articulate. She rose thru the glass ceiling to reach CEO of HP. In that job she created so much animosity within the corporation that she was ousted by HP's board of directors and upon her firing wall street responded with a big jump in HP's stock price reflected the investor view that she was bad for the business. Since then she ran a bad campaign against Sen. Boxer replete with demon sheep. She has no governmental experience, no legislative experience, no politically successful experience. She didn't even vote in most elections which tells me she didn't much care who won. She did explain in 2008 that Palin was not qualified to run a business but that didn't make her unqualified to run the USA. How is that if Carly was qualified to poorly run HP, that translates into successfully managing the USA?