Quote:
Originally Posted by Guest
Marriage should have been left as, and as I believe and many others (probably a majority), is between a man and a woman. Two beings that can create another being.
Those who prefer other than man and woman should be called something else.
We all know it was not called something else because they wanted whatever benefits accorded a man and woman in marriage.
The usual use, abuse or hide behind the law and most importantly a means for politicians to create a new voting block.
We are whoring away and redefining certain aspects of our lives and beliefs we have had for centuries to accomodate the few (and re-election!).
|
They can call it whatever they wish. My marriage was a blessing from God. That's one entity that they can't force into acceptance. I can get the law to change my name to Frita or Mary, but that don't make me female in God's eyes. God don't make mistakes and those that feel different are just insulting Him. If they wish to embarrass themselves by dressing as women, it's a free country and I respect their right. And I respect their right to love whatever they wish, be it male to male, female to female, male to dog, horse, sheep, or chicken, etc. The law is the law. But, the law can't legislate blessings from God, no matter what they force from the churches. It's not my responsibility to condemn. That's God's bailiwick.