Quote:
Originally Posted by Guest
Here is the short answer to you whining - ELECTIONS HAVE CONSEQUENCES.
Maybe - just maybe - if the R's gave their nomination to a moderate who didn't put his foot in his mouth every second and who didn't go around alienating huge blocks of voters you'd stop crying about the majority not ruling like it once did. Presumably, you mean back in the 40's or 50's when everybody was white
Have some earth shattering news for you - it's 2015, Hispanics are the fastest growing block of voters, 51% of the electorate are women.
Deal with it
|
You are correct, elections do have consequences. Obama blatantly proves that point. In a negative way, of course.
Of course you make everything into a racial, sexual deviant or gender issue. But, I take that for granted considering your ignorance.
Talking about alienating huge blocks of voters? We'll see how this election fares for the left Obama has alienated just about everyone with his flip-flopping policies.
If you think women are dumb enough to vote with the left this time, I think you are in for a rude awakening. Women work today. They don't need liberal welfare. And they want a real woman to vote in as the first female president. Hilary is not their choice. And do you really think that Hilary will get the Latin vote? I don't think so. And she definitely won't get the Independent vote, and that is what will be the deciding factor in this election.
If the Dems want a winning candidate for 2016, they had better ditch Hilary. She has no chance of winning the election. Then again, keep her and make it easier for us.