Quote:
Originally Posted by rubicon
This forum will never have an objective conversation about The villages, the Daily sun, the POA or the VHA or anything remotely connected to the aforementioned because its the Hatfield and McCoy mentality again
The rationale is simply a marketing concept. If TVLSI marketing convinced you as a customer that buying into this community was buying value then you will in turn market TVLSI brand and remain a loyal consumer. If marketing did not and somewhere along the way you as a resident felt that you received less then you expected then you won't market the TVLSI brand. When two people operate on different philosophical levels they will just never agree.
So here we are again with "Is so"Īs not" Īs so""Is not"..............
Personal Best Regards
|
Somewhere along the line you left out the matter of truth. Your argument is like saying objective discussions about Jonestown or Scientology can never happen because both sides are biased. No. There is the obvious truth. And then there are the koolaid drinkers. Does anyone really believe, had the developer done nothing wrong, he would have SETTLED for $40M payout? I mean, come on. It's becoming laughable.