Originally Posted by Guest

Actually, you are partially wrong. The Supreme Court DOES take religion into consideration when making some decisions. Remember, we have the constitutional right to FREEDOM OF RELIGION. And there have been many court decisions based on one's religious freedom. But, I get what you mean.

The decisions "rendered by the Supreme Court are the law of the land" until another court decides differently. The court does change when judges die or retire.

We have three branches of government, and the president is NOT king, emperor, supreme ruler, etc.....regardless of what he thinks. Obama abuses his right to executive order, more than any other president. It does not matter the quantity of EO's signed, but the power and effect they have. This King of Czars has abused his power on several occasions and he will go down in history as the worst, most abusive and divisive presidential experiment ever.

As far as your first point saying you can't find anything related to my statement, that's your problem. You asked, I told you, and it is up to you to dispute my statement with countering research. I am not going to do it for you. I am tired of doing the work for liberals. And it was a Federal Court order that Obama violated, that may not have gone to the Supreme Court. But, it just shows one incident of many that Obama blatantly disregarded in contempt. He even said publicly that he felt that the Supreme Court is wrong on more than one case.