Kim Davis
 

Lawbreaker.
Offends anyone who believes in the constitution.
Religious terrorist.
Don't tell me this is ok and shout Save our guns based on the 2d amendment.
Imagine the value of our constitution if this ??!?. Don't get fired for failing to do her job. Uuigggghh

So, are you trying to say that you aren't a big fan? It's kinda hard to tell.

She is a dolt who does not understand when the Supreme Court makes a decision, it is immediately the law of the land.

This RIGHT has been long fought for the LGBT community and even when upheld by the highest court in the land, this disrespectful jerk says NO! She has no business working in a public office sworn to defend all the rights of all the people of this great nation. When you refuse to follow the laws of this country, you give up your right to represent any of the law abiding US citizens. PUT HER BEHIND BARS with the rest off he criminals.

Well, there should be plenty of room since your liberal president is going to let out 6,000 drug dealers.

She is far worse for the security of this country than any pot head. Try again!

Sorry, find this thread and this topic to be so misguided and uninformed.

Of course she needs to obey the law. She asked for an accomodation and yep, she must follow the law but this is all a trumped up media event. Couple comes back many times, is treated with courtesy and then shows up with cameras.

Is this really an important issue to waste your breath on.

How about the people dying in Syria or the middle east on fire or our economy and unemployment and on it could go, but this one lady in one place has your attention.

Please explain why?

Are speaking about Hillary Clinton or Kim Davis?

Has she been a devout follower of Christ her entire life?

Really, you don't understand this. Wow, you need more help than I can give you. If that was humor LOL.

The security of the country is at stake? Please. Now, that's funny!

I think you misunderstood what she meant. She did not say the security of the country was at stake or even compromised. We must read carefully in order to make coherent replies.

Seems to be making a mountain out of a molehill. She should do her job without letting her personal religious beliefs interfere with the performance of her duties but she is hardly a "terrorist" of any kind.

Liberals want to throw a woman in jail because she didn't do her job. And by the way, there was no instruction or new forms to account for gay marriage yet, when she refused. She could be relieved of her job, but she didn't break a law. There is no law that says she must do her job or go to jail.

On the other hand, liberals want to protect Hilary, who is a felon and no doubt a felon that just hasn't been convicted yet. There are felony laws for what she did. She deserves to go to jail for a very long time, but liberals think national security is a lark and not to be taken seriously.

So, a Democrat didn't do her job and she should be jailed and a cabinet member committed multiple felony offenses dealing with national security and should be left alone because she said it is all just a Republican conspiracy.

This is a lame thread and anyone wishing to give it any more time obviously doesn't have enough to do.