I don't know the poster, but it does not seem reasonable to call him a bigot. He/she did not mention anything that fit the definition, but maybe you know him/her personally.

To call someone that you don't agree with a Christian, also because you don't agree with him/her suggests that you are not a Christian. That's too bad, and hopefully you will someday see the light.

A resolution like this seems to be redundant, just like the idea of hate crime laws. Limiting the first amendment is not the American way. However, manners should be encouraged, not mandated. This resolution has no substance since it is only a suggestion and not a law. It appears to be nothing much more than a ploy to gain Democrat support for more votes. On the other hand, it is divisive in nature and sure to cause more animosity toward the left from the right. It may even cause friction from moderate Democrats that may feel insulted that the gov wants to coddle a religious culture that seems intent to eradicate infidels, namely us. Their intent to gain support from the Islamic community may backfire on them, causing them to lose more votes than gain.