Quote:
Originally Posted by Guest
"no benghazi during Bush Admin!" Maybe you need to do some research on all the embassy attacks and lives lost during the Bush Admin! Remember, as well, if W had not invaded Irag, we would not have the situation we currently have! After 9/11 Bush went into Iraq instead of going after the people responsible for 9/11 in Saudi Arabia! And another fact is that W was trying to appease his dad because Bush Sr and Hussien had a history!!
|
Blah, blah, blah.....if you know all the answers, why ask a question?
I was state dept during Bush and I was not worried about traveling with my family overseas. The only little worry I had was when I was shot at daily when I was in Baghdad, on loan to the coalition. My quarters was destroyed so I moved into my office, and slept on a cot until time to go back to my family in another country. But, that was a war zone.
No, Libya was of no concern until Obama. You can argue the war in Iraq all you wish. I've been there and I probably have a bit more insight on it than you. Maybe. But, that is for another thread.
The subject is about Libya and was it a mistake. It is easy to Monday quarterback, but in my opinion, we have a bunch of inexperienced amateurs in D.C. that should have hired better and more experienced advisors. Obama is a know it all that speaks to America like they are bunch of children, when his knowledge is on par with those children. Hillary spent her time trying to accumulate frequent traveler miles and did just about nothing, other than pad her pockets. D.C. was and still is a cluster f***.