Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Guest
Well, surely I have said I THOUGHT this would happen and offered it as an opinion, so smart a$$ remarks aside I still believe it.
Not alone by the way...back in March read this.....
"In an open letter to voters supporting Donald Trump in the Republican presidential primary, the former communications director of Trump’s now-defunct Super PAC said that the former reality television star not only never expected to be the Republican nominee, much less president, but never even wanted to be.
Writing for the website xojane.com, Stephanie Cegielski said that when she was brought aboard as communications director for the Make America Great Again PAC last summer, the instructions from Trump Tower were to make sure that Trump finished a respectable second in the GOP primary. It was made clear that Trump was running not as a serious contender, but as a “protest” candidate.
That certainly does not make it so, nor am I saying any such thing. There were news reports on air back during the nomination process where associates said the same thing, BUT
That proves nothing.
As I said, my opinion is based on a few things...
1. In his entire life...I mean as far back as you check, and I did. This man has never done anything or said anything that did not offer gains for HIM. That is validated by 5 biographers, his writings, his ghost writer and other sources so it is not a guess.
2. His company is PRIVATE, and up to now he has resisrpted any thought of a blind trust. He is currently fighting with ethics folks on how he might satisfy everyone. The WSJ on Friday offered up resolutions, but he resists them all.
3. Why does he resist ? Not sure obviously, but this is the least transparent President Elect and with a private business, LOTS of foreign debt, and no tax returns, we know nothing.
He will face big time hurdles in any negotiations where tax reform, wall st reform, etc are on the table. He has ties wit Iran, Russia, Turkey and folks who at one times were "involved" with terrorism. All of that is known.
All that together just suggests that he is not going to open up, nor lose any money.
Heck, the WSJ recommendation requires him to sell everything and put into a blind trust.
, and already he has Giuliani out saying that would put his kids out of work.
So, I do not know, but think this board is about informed opinions.
|
Sounds to me like you are a sore loser. Hillary is also one that never did anything that didn't benefit herself. Most politicians are like that or they do not get re-elected.
There is no law that prohibits the president from owning a business. Just like your complaint that he did not release his tax return, he is not required to give up his business either. Just because someone else may have done it, does not make it mandatory. So, get over it.
Regarding "transparency" there is no such thing and never has been. Obama makes a show of it but only because he enjoys talking in front of lots of people. He kept his secrets also. There is no rule of "transparency" regardless of what you libtards wish for. I am sure that if you would have been able to elect Hitlery, you would have had even less transparency. Of course, her reason would be to HIDE what she is doing illegally.
I see that you bait other posters to answer you. You know that you are trolling. No one really wishes to respond because they/we have answered your repetitious baiting over and over again.
I have a neighbor that refuses to leave their home because Hitlery lost and that person cannot face anyone in the neighborhood because of that person's nasty attack on Trump. Some folks make losing worst than it really is. I hated it when the socialist Obama won, twice. But, I lived with it for 8 years, glad that America survived him. We survived him because even the Democrats could not get 100% behind him. The best chuckle I got from him was his serious statement that he believes in "leading from behind" when anyone that has ever been in leadership positions or had any leadership training knows that leading from behind is another term for FOLLOWING. That's because Obama has never had any experience leading. His experience is solely based on talking. Nothing but talk. As Harry Reid said, Obama speaks very good "white" when he wants to. Yes, he speaks well on script, but when off script he rambles and bores everyone to sleep.
I really don't care what you think of Trump. He won and Hillary lost. The best part was Hillary losing. She would have been a disgrace to our country. Everyone knows she is corrupt and criminal. She would have been a very poor representative of our country. Anyone would be better, including even Bernie. And I would not have voted for him either, just saying.