Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Guest
This makes no sense. The substance of this thread is the remarks made by Bob Corker and the differing public orations between POTUS and his Secy of state and Secy defense.
None of that is conjecture, but established facts.
I also object to responses that attack the messenger. The media reports. This administration continually and always attacks as fake news, NOT ONLY NEVER PROVEN, NO ATTEMPT TO VALIDATE ONGOING ACCUSATIONS.
His attacks on the media do not change facts. It is intended to confuse and obviously is working with you. He attacks any network if they catch him, but then will quote the same network if they say something good. He simply makes accusations and you accept it as fact. I do not and Che k and recheck. He is,playing you.
|
Established facts?!? Corker did not admit to anything - a lot of innuendo was about it. Now the reporter, on the other hand, did a lot of embellishing to make it sound like fact. Are we reading the same articles?? I'll repeat........I'm not saying that this may not be true, but I would need more evidence than what I've seen so far to be convinced. Just as I double-checked and tried to verify the stuff being said about our former President before drawing a conclusion, I will continue to do the same with this one. It's not about being duped by someone as you suggested, or wanting to push an agenda, it's about caring about the truth - as much as that is possible not being on the inside.