Quote:
Originally Posted by Number 10 GI
How does that change the fact that the customer is jeopardizing the server's health when they take their mask off when they eat but have no concern for the server's health?
|
Your point is correct but then you are making the point for keeping the restaurants closed which is NOT good.
The mask on the server protects him somewhat (better than nothing) from the diner and also protects the diner so it's a 75% savings and keeps the place, er, economy open or the other choice where everyone loses is just shut it down. Why have BOTH not wearing it and increase chances for both people of illness. Obviously you can't put food in your mouth with a mask on and you can't do business with diners eating with masks on but you can show concern for your customers (without who you wouldn't be opened) and wear a mask. Always err for the more positive outcome (one person with mask) rather then no one.
So bottom line, Yea, have it your way and have both not wear them. It's only "fair" that both people might just possibly get sick.