Quote:
Originally Posted by golfing eagles
No idea how this thread survives with all the political BS
|
Because it's not political. This fact would still be factual, if the state's leader was someone else or was a member of any other political party. It would be factual if it happened in another state. When the EPA says "you can't do this thing" it means - there's no need or reason to spend a single dime of taxpayer money on a study to determine whether or not this thing is feasible. It is already determined to be NOT feasible, by the EPA.
If it was a Democrat governor my opinion would be exactly the same. Don't waste taxpayer dollars on a feasibility study for something the EPA has already said you can't do.