View Single Post
 
Old 09-25-2024, 07:55 AM
fdpaq0580 fdpaq0580 is offline
Sage
Join Date: Sep 2012
Posts: 5,945
Thanks: 355
Thanked 5,065 Times in 2,155 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by golfing eagles View Post
What a load of you know what. β€œProven” by 5-30 years of data??? A whole 5-30 years out of the last 5 million?πŸ˜‚πŸ˜‚πŸ˜‚. Amazing that one warm day is touted as proof not only of global warming but that humans are causing it, yet snow in South Africa for the first time EVER is dismissed as just β€œWeatherβ€πŸ˜‚πŸ˜‚πŸ˜‚
"Load of you know what". You mean manure?
Dear wanderer, I disagree, along with the grand majority of the world's best climate scientists. Their opinions are based on the incredible bodies of evidence founded in all the best scientific methods. The world's best minds accept the basic fact of man's involvement in global warming.
As to your 5-30 years comment, I offer an analogy (which I'm sure you will find fault with). A man drives across the country for hundreds of thousands of miles. Crossing mountains, deserts, plains, rivers, cities. Then, one day something happens that causes him to crash. The investigators note he has driven through all kinds of terrain and weather with only normal wear and tear. They look for what happened recently that may have caused him to crash. They find the dead deer with car impact damage, skidmarks beginning where the car hit the deer. They don't really need to check out the drivers, or the deers, whole life story to figure out what happened, do they? The evidence is pretty clear. Same with man's involvement with global warming. The evidence is clear and overwhelming to all but the most diehard conspiracy theorists. πŸ« πŸ€”πŸ«€