
09-25-2024, 10:44 AM
|
Sage
|
Join Date: Mar 2015
Location: The Villages
Posts: 13,479
Thanks: 1,241
Thanked 14,511 Times in 4,782 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by fdpaq0580
"Load of you know what". You mean manure?
Dear wanderer, I disagree, along with the grand majority of the world's best climate scientists. Their opinions are based on the incredible bodies of evidence founded in all the best scientific methods. The world's best minds accept the basic fact of man's involvement in global warming.
As to your 5-30 years comment, I offer an analogy (which I'm sure you will find fault with). A man drives across the country for hundreds of thousands of miles. Crossing mountains, deserts, plains, rivers, cities. Then, one day something happens that causes him to crash. The investigators note he has driven through all kinds of terrain and weather with only normal wear and tear. They look for what happened recently that may have caused him to crash. They find the dead deer with car impact damage, skidmarks beginning where the car hit the deer. They don't really need to check out the drivers, or the deers, whole life story to figure out what happened, do they? The evidence is pretty clear. Same with man's involvement with global warming. The evidence is clear and overwhelming to all but the most diehard conspiracy theorists. 🫠🤔🫤
|
First of all, the world’s best climate scientists “opinion” is based solely upon tauting the party line for professional survival. Secondly, not a good analogy at all
|