Quote:
Originally Posted by Bill14564
A few assumptions there that have yet to be proven.
In the end, it is almost always human error. The “system” is there to try to remove as many chances for human error as possible and to reduce their impact if they do occur. If parts of the system are removed then more errors can occur with serious effects.
The second controller, fewer flights to reduce workload, and more of a buffer between allowed airspace would all have helped.
I wonder if the collision avoidance mentioned is effective or even active on final approach and under 500 feet.
|
I guess the real question, and probably the proximate cause of the collision, is why was the BH with a celling of 200 feet at 350 feet?