Quote:
Originally Posted by biker1
I don’t believe that would pass the sniff test and I doubt it would have much, if any, support. In the 11 years I have lived here, I have not seen such a thing done. As I already stated, reallocating funds within the existing amenities’ budget is presumably a possibility.
|
No, you haven't seen that done even when amenities have been added (Black Lake walking path) or proposed (Lake Sumter Landing Recreational Boating Facility). But that doesn't mean the clause doesn't exist.
4.1(c): Each Owner agrees that as additional facilities are requested by the Owner, and the erection of such additional facilities is agreed to by the Developer, that upon a vote of 1/2 of the Owners approving such additional facilities and commensurate charges therefore, the monthly Contractual Amenities Fee provided for herein shall be increased accordingly. For the purposes of all votes, the Developer shall be entitle to one (1) vote for each Homesite owned by the Developer. As Community Watch and gate manning are considered amenities, the pool monitoring could be considered an amenity and that clause could be exercised. I doubt it would come to that, but it's there.
__________________
Why do people insist on making claims without looking them up first, do they really think no one will check? Proof by emphatic assertion rarely works.
Confirmation bias is real; I can find any number of articles that say so.
Victor, NY - Randallstown, MD - Yakima, WA - Stevensville, MD - Village of Hillsborough
|