[ElDiabloJoe]

Originally Posted by HappyTraveler

That is a MUCH better idea than some of the others I've read posted here - some of which have too much ongoing cost, commotion and are overkill considering the small size of the problem.

Having said that, I still don't remotely see TV or the Districts spending the time or effort attempting to solve an issue that is presently so minimal. From their POV it would be making a mountain out of a mole hill - which isn't a good way to run anything.

This will likely not be an issue unless and until an unauthorized person gains access and harm is caused to an authorized person. The subsequent legal actions and civil penalties will cause a paradigm shift in perspective and budget priorities to prevent same from occurring again. At the very least mitigating culpability and responsibility. Not sure if a CDD has deep pockets or can be held liable, but the Developer, who initiated the CDD structure, could be held liable - and personally so if punitive damages are awarded. Just sayin...

It's the same reason hotels go to such effort (and expense) to prevent unauthorized person(s) from accessing their building, amenities, hallways, and rooms.