Quote:
Originally Posted by BrianL99
The defense strategy in the 2nd Read trial is known as the "Bowden defense".
The 1st trial used a derivation of the "3rd party culprit" defense. The judge in the 2nd case, limited their use of the 3rd party culprit defense, in her retrial.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oTPZKiyGfgA&t=30s |
After two trials, I think the lawyers will be able to present an air tight case for Karen Read in the civil case. She had some damn good lawyers
https://youtu.be/YuiI37P4dgY
But stupid people do make it on juries so injustice might prevail again.
I believe that if Proctor hadn't foolishly busted the tail light at the sally port and then planted the pieces in the front yard the verdict may have been different. This is because the defense had absolute proof that Karens tail light was illuminated and the red lens not completely smashed well after the alledged time of o'keefes death.