Quote:
Originally Posted by ithos
|
the jury slip options are not guilty, or guilty....or in totally corrupt massachusetts, at all levels including trials, some charges did not have a not guilty option. guilty was the only choice on charge 2 for Read. there was not a not guilty option. how corrupt is that?
as far as innocent? it was not an option for the jurors, so how can it even be considered at all?
total corruption at karen read trial, by the investigating state police, and canton police dept. and glaring corrupt judge cannone, who was a disgrace .....i have stronger description of this corrupt, non-qualified political appointed judge, but everyone knows what i am talking about...