Quote:
Originally Posted by ithos
So she was drunk and still was able to floor it in reverse for over 80ft at night in poor light conditions and slamming into her boyfriend and launching him 15ft onto the lawn or driveway. She must have been one hell of driver.
But if so these facts are hard to explain:
No Lower-Extremity Bruising or Fractures
lacerations to the Shins, Thighs, or Pelvic area
Also, in reenactments it took several blows with a hammer to completely break and remove all pieces of the thick poly carbonate lens.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CBqMcX4jgeA
Unfortunately for the prosecution there were pictures and videos of Karen Reads tail light illuminated with the lens almost completely intact after the time of the alledged murder. According to more than one juror this proved beyond any doubt that she was innocent. |
That video was not credible , why didn't you use the one shown in court by ARCCA. Clearly shows taillight shattered by elbow on dummy and throwing him forward along side of car . Shattered taillight pieces flying in all directions. According to ARCCA defence Wolfe , taillight was not broken when she backed out of garage and purposely tapped john car. No pieces is dusting of snow . Look at car showing both taillights, clearly shows missing piece on right.