Quote:
Originally Posted by KAM+6
NO dog DNA, NO lower teeth marks, NO puncture wounds, NO dog hair = NO dog attack.
Blunt force trauma on back of his head was caused by head hitting frozen ground , confirmed testimony by three ME. He had "racoon eyes". Blood vessels broke when his brain forced forward. NO orbital fractures, indicating punched in eyes. NO beat up face or body consistent with being in a fight.
Tech stream data from her SUV matches with Johns phone to the second. She went forward 34 feet, slammed it in reverse and clipped him, throwing him 10 feet into the lawn. He exited her SUV and his phone stopped moving 17 seconds later. His health app shows his heart stopped beating also. NONE of Tech stream and GPS and health data was EVER disputed by the defence because it is BULLETPROOF.
Her defense lawyer stated to the court " it was an unintended accident " and to the press, on the courthouse steps, the day of her arrangement.
|
Video and eyewitness testimony proves beyond all doubt that the taillight was not busted out after she dropped O'keefe off at the Albert's home.
It is delusional to believe all those parallel scratches on his arm was a result of impact with a taillight.