Quote:
Originally Posted by ithos
And here is the testimony of a police officer who assisted in towing Karen Read's SUV away from her house after the murder. He testified that there were cracks but most of the lens was in still there.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hb8xjHDwLy8
Sergeant Nicholas Barros testified that when he saw Karen Read’s SUV in Dighton, the taillight damage was nowhere near as severe as the photos now being shown in court. He says it was cracked but intact, with bulbs and tabs still in place. So why did the damage look so much worse after the vehicle had been moved to Canton PD, under Trooper Proctor’s supervision? This video breaks down the suspicious timeline, lack of documentation, and what it could mean for the prosecution’s case. |
Why didn't you show Court TV trial of Barros complete testimony that included cross exam??? You chose only the direct posted by a "blogger" . Hank Brennan successfully had Barros admit that the taillight damage he saw was EXACTLY like the photo of dash cam video taken 8 hours earlier before Karen and her dad took it to Dighton. An additional foot of snow had fallen during that time. The defense showed a photo of SUV with NO snow or snow packed tailight.
Also he admitted he testified in first trial that there was a dent in the tailgate. Which he mysteriously left out in this testimony.