Quote:
Originally Posted by KAM+6
Yes, the video of actuall trial is correct of Barros. The CROSS by Brennan where Barros ADMITTED that what he saw was EXACTLY like the taillight he saw, NOT like the photo Shown by defence of the sally port where all the blizzard snow was packed in it.and had melted Barros never went to the sallyport. The photos and videos were taken 8 hours before her parents took her SUV to their house 40 miles way. CLEARLY show broken tailight compared to left side tailight HOURS before police took SUV.
Sert team started shoveling a 3 ft snow bank at 5:20, with several police, and a news crew filming. First pieces were found about 5:30. SUV was still being towed to Canton, all on dash cam video. Also found was his sneaker , hat and straw from drink Karen said he took from her car when he exited. Several pieces were found as the snow melted. This was one of the worst blizzard in Canton history with over 24" and snow drifts over 3'.
Tech stream data from her SUV recorded it went 34' forward, slammed into reverse 80+' . with a pedestrian strike. Timestamp correlated with GPS and health app on Johnny's phone. Johnny died 17 seconds after exiting her SUV.
Johnny NEVER entered the house. Karen hit him and left him to DIE in the blizzard.
|
The 12 jurors and alternatives clearly disagree. Almost all were interviewed and said they believed she was innocent, not merely Not Guilty. There is an avalanche of evidence proving that John O'keefe entered the house. But in the second trial the lawyers focus was narrowed to just meeting the low bar of "beyond a reasonable doubt"
You still continue to avoid explaing how a impact with a SUV causes scratches without leaving any bruises.