Talk of The Villages Florida - View Single Post - Not Friendly Anymore
View Single Post
 
Old 12-25-2010, 03:10 PM
Pturner's Avatar
Pturner Pturner is offline
Sage
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Atlanta
Posts: 7,064
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by redwitch View Post
From what I understand, there are usually between 6 and 14 who participate. Occasionally, some of the golfers don't show up, servers are off. Sometimes one will "front" for another; sometimes they won't. She was off and claims someone fronted her. Guess it's up to whomever supposedly paid her $1.00 to either admit or deny (or she's going to have to prove she gave her $1.00 to someone -- difficult thing to do).

It could be any of the following scenarios:

1. She's being cheated by the other winners.

2. She's trying to scam her way into the winnings.

3. She's innocent of scamming but really has no right to any of the winnings because no one paid her share.

4. Someone forgot to mention that $1.00 was for her and now is afraid to step up.

Regardless, no one should be too quick to condemn anyone in this. They could all be innocent. We just don't have the facts.
I agree.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Talk Host View Post
I'm wondering how many times this person may have missed paying the $1. Was this the first time or was it a regular occurrence? Was she in fact part of the group, or was she just an occasional contributor? Did the others, in fact, pitch in for a missing person from time to time or not.

Was the ticket acutually owned 7 ways or 6 ways. That is to say, did somebody put the $1 in for her then after the win declare two shares. Or, since she didn't pay, was she left out altogether and only six tickets purchased. IF somebody put it a dollar for her, then that person owns a double share of the win.

There is a reason that she is being exluded. It's not likely that ALL six of the others would be in agreement to leave her out without a sound reason.
Excellent questions. We don't know all the facts. Heck we know almost none of them. That article was some sorry excuse for news reporting.