Quote:
Originally Posted by buggyone
I really like the one poster who said something like if you google Romney and Bain Capital, the only things that show up will be from left leaning sources. That seems a little out there that all the sources showing Romney's term with Bain Capital are from left leaning sources.
That is sort of like saying a big chicken dinner is always from KFC with no other alternatives ever to be discussed.
|
You are losing it...you cannot even come on here and be a wise guy without screwing it up.....you know that you took this out of context, but then again perhaps not......
IN CONTEXT....in showing there was NO investigation...
"
Quote:
Originally Posted by janmcn View Post
So why do documents filed with Securities and Exchange Commission after 1999 list Mitt Romney as Bain Capital's sole stockholder, Chairman of the Board, CEO, and President, and show that Romney earned at least $100,000 as a Bain Capital "executive" in 2001 and 2002? Hopefully, this is what the SEC is investigating and any charges could be felonious.
Did Mitt Romney approve of Bain Capital’s practices after 1999? - Editorials - The Boston Globe
1. The link you supplied is a blog and opnion piece and makes no mention of any impending or discussion of any "investigation" so surely would appreciate a link to validate this "investigation !
2. A search of the Securities and Exchange commisssion website shows no investigation or discussion of such...thus supplying the source would help since I like to deal with facts.
3. If you even google this, you will get nothing but left leaning bloggers on forums like this talking about it but no facts.
Edit/Delete Message
Next time you want to make fun, insure that you read the entire thing !
you even left out the last part of my sentence where I said "no facts"....geez