Quote:
Originally Posted by redwitch
But Fruitland Park carts are prohibited from using 466A, so, unless street legal, how would they get here? And I sincerely doubt it would be lots of carts from any outlying areas -- the distance is just too great and the hazards even greater.
Wish we could get an actual count of the number of carts that would be added to the paths if allowed or maybe set up something that carts would be able to go no further than Brownwood for Fruitland Park/Wildwood residents and no further than Spanish Springs for residents off of 441.
I do understand the Developer's reasons. I don't understand TV residents' reasoning and, quite honestly, I hope I never do.
|
Red, if you look at the situation as if all planned development is complete, Fruitland Park wouldn't come into the equation. However, if Stonecrest is given the green light to access to The Villages and the Village of Fruitland Park, that is currently in the works, gets the go ahead; Fruitland Park would probably quickly build a golf cart path to the fenced perimeter of that village and petition Lake County for access to The Villages multimodal paths. In effect, so it's citizenry could access all the services contained within The Villages and not cause them "hardship".
Keep in mind that Spruce Creek South would love direct access to The Villages and what would keep the business south of Rolling Acres Road from petitioning that county for a golf cart bridge to cross Rolling Acres Road. Who doesn't want direct access to what the Morse family has created?
I think one has to look at a map and the total picture to see what open access to Villages multimodal paths would entail.