The more one reads about Clinton the more one wonders why some support her?

[Guest]

Here is another in one's pick of many articles about the witchy-bitchy Clinton. And even her aids seem to think they are above the little people as well:

'Don't you know who I am?' How Hillary's 'arrogant' aide Huma Abedin - now in the crosshairs of Servergate - tried to force her way past Secret Service agents without ID and expected them to carry her luggage | Daily Mail Online (http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3204827/Don-t-know-Hillary-s-arrogant-aide-Huma-Abedin-crosshairs-Servergate-tried-force-way-past-Secret-Service-agents-without-ID-expected-carry-luggage.html)

After a Clinton supporter reads this article, please be so knind as to why you think this phony should be the democratic candidate?

[Guest]

Here is another in one's pick of many articles about the witchy-bitchy Clinton. And even her aids seem to think they are above the little people as well:

'Don't you know who I am?' How Hillary's 'arrogant' aide Huma Abedin - now in the crosshairs of Servergate - tried to force her way past Secret Service agents without ID and expected them to carry her luggage | Daily Mail Online (http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3204827/Don-t-know-Hillary-s-arrogant-aide-Huma-Abedin-crosshairs-Servergate-tried-force-way-past-Secret-Service-agents-without-ID-expected-carry-luggage.html)

After a Clinton supporter reads this article, please be so knind as to why you think this phony should be the democratic candidate?

I'm sure that they will divert with something that Romney or Bush did when they were kids. Or, Sarah Palin is still useful if they dust her off and use her as a target. The one I enjoy the best was when the liberals claimed Palin had a boob job. I finally found some interest in political debate.

[Guest]

I love the part about the SS agent being quoted as saying if they get assigned Clinton detail, it's considered a form of punishment.

[Guest]

Thec Daily Mail is a tabloid, right up there with the National Enquirer., not a credible news source. But I guess people believe what they want to, irregardless of the facts.

[Guest]

Thec Daily Mail is a tabloid, right up there with the National Enquirer., not a credible news source. But I guess people believe what they want to, irregardless of the facts.

:1rotfl::1rotfl::1rotfl:
As predictable as the rain in FL!!!

And if this was the only place Clinton and her assistant were being presented as with-bitches but it is not. She is portrayed exactly the same way in many, many articles in exactly the same manner with quotes from secret service, military and law enforcement and how she treats them all with dis-respect.

So nice try at attempting to digress away from the subject.

:1rotfl::1rotfl::1rotfl:

[Guest]

Here is another in one's pick of many articles about the witchy-bitchy Clinton. And even her aids seem to think they are above the little people as well:

'Don't you know who I am?' How Hillary's 'arrogant' aide Huma Abedin - now in the crosshairs of Servergate - tried to force her way past Secret Service agents without ID and expected them to carry her luggage | Daily Mail Online (http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3204827/Don-t-know-Hillary-s-arrogant-aide-Huma-Abedin-crosshairs-Servergate-tried-force-way-past-Secret-Service-agents-without-ID-expected-carry-luggage.html)

After a Clinton supporter reads this article, please be so knind as to why you think this phony should be the democratic candidate?

I'm sure that the Secret Service agent recognized Huma Abedin. Just about everyone knows who she is, she is the one that married the pervert, Anthony "My package doesn't get enough attention" Weiner.

[Guest]

Thec Daily Mail is a tabloid, right up there with the National Enquirer., not a credible news source. But I guess people believe what they want to, irregardless of the facts.

:1rotfl::1rotfl::1rotfl::1rotfl:

Ha, ha, ha, I knew it!!

:mademyday:

[Guest]

Here is another in one's pick of many articles about the witchy-bitchy Clinton. And even her aids seem to think they are above the little people as well:

'Don't you know who I am?' How Hillary's 'arrogant' aide Huma Abedin - now in the crosshairs of Servergate - tried to force her way past Secret Service agents without ID and expected them to carry her luggage | Daily Mail Online (http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3204827/Don-t-know-Hillary-s-arrogant-aide-Huma-Abedin-crosshairs-Servergate-tried-force-way-past-Secret-Service-agents-without-ID-expected-carry-luggage.html)

After a Clinton supporter reads this article, please be so knind as to why you think this phony should be the democratic candidate?









Uh-Oh, that immediately disqualifies Mrs C. Are you really that scared of her?

[Guest]

Uh-Oh, that immediately disqualifies Mrs C. Are you really that scared of her?

Yep, I am. She scares me at how she callously disregards national security. It also worries me that she treats her staff and others around her with disdain. She is a very ugly person and not up to my standards of an honorable president. If you can settle for her, then I wouldn't trust you either.

[Guest]

Uh-Oh, that immediately disqualifies Mrs C. Are you really that scared of her?

Anybody who is not afraid of the bad guy (generic) has no sense. She has been proven time and again to be a bad person. Disrespectful to everybody and anybody except herself!!

[Guest]

In keeping with the theme of the thread, the more one reads about Clinton, rather than start another Clinton thread.

In this morning's National Journal there is an article by Molly Mirhashem about the feminists movement in America from one's eye.
She and the person she is writing about state there are many differences in what feminism means to each person.

Here is a quote from the article describing her thoughts on Clinton's view of feminism:

"And Hillary Clinton came to look like the symbol of an older generation of women more concerned with female empowerment—in particular, with white, middle-class, American female empowerment—than with broader issues of social and economic justice."

How accurate is that? 100% based on some of the reactions on this forum!

I look at it this way. If Clinton was half of what some say she is....or if she was really better than most of what she is accused, there would be an abundance of writings about it. But there is not. The reasoning is obvious. What is being said about her is over whelmingly true.

If the feminists want to put another notch on their pistol it is too bad they elected to use a loser.

This is what happens when money and power lead the rank and file instead of the rank and file making their determination of who they can be proud to represent them and have confidence in their candidate.

Clinton will not be their candidate (thank GOD).

[Guest]

Hillary needs to hire Monica to her team of misfits, somebody that can get the job done or get raise Johnson!:boom:

[Guest]

Forget all the bluster from the Clintonites. common sense dictates that Hillary was the custodian of all information/communication received and passed along in connection with the people's business conducted at the State Department. She made claim the server was secured but by whom? Further who cleared all the people with access to this server?

We all know what is going on here its all about stalling dragging their feet hoping they can delay any action until after the election.

Frankly i am tired of the people circling the wagons for politicians...if they did wrong bounce them for God sake because the only one being hurt are voters/taxpayers

It was predictable that Obama was going to be a disaster and it is obvious that clinton will be no better

Personal Best Regards:

[Guest]

In the 80's, my office did an investigation (along with the FBI) that uncovered a Fed Gov employee in Suitland, MD that had a file cabinet full of classified documents and Satellite photos in his home. He was getting ready to leave the gov and was attempting to get employment with Jane's, as in Jane's fighting ships, published in London. He was doing some free lance work writing for them in his spare time. He was arrested and sentenced to a long stay at one of our federal institutions.

[Guest]

Forget all the bluster from the Clintonites. common sense dictates that Hillary was the custodian of all information/communication received and passed along in connection with the people's business conducted at the State Department. She made claim the server was secured but by whom? Further who cleared all the people with access to this server?

We all know what is going on here its all about stalling dragging their feet hoping they can delay any action until after the election.

Frankly i am tired of the people circling the wagons for politicians...if they did wrong bounce them for God sake because the only one being hurt are voters/taxpayers

It was predictable that Obama was going to be a disaster and it is obvious that clinton will be no better

Personal Best Regards:


I don't think they can delay long enough frankly.

This morning the New York Times has an article concerning Biden's investigation into running and financing, etc.

This was part of that article...

"At the same time, some Democrats supporting Mrs. Clinton have quietly signaled that they would re-evaluate their support if Mr. Biden joined the race. For example, Tom Daschle, an influential former Senate Democratic leader who has given the maximum amount allowable to Mrs. Clinton’s campaign, has indicated that he would reassess his position if Mr. Biden entered the race, according to people who have been in contact with him in recent days."

http://www.nytimes.com/2015/08/22/us/politics/joe-biden-campaign.html?_r=0

[Guest]

The problem is that even if Hilary goes to jail (she won't) the Democrats will still vote for her. They don't care if she is a felonious Mata Hari, they want to elect the first female president. But, it HAS to be a Democrat.

[Guest]

Yes, it has to be a democrat. I believe in the democratic partys point of view. Republicans believe in their partys point of view. Primaries are to pick which person can beat the other party. I may not agree with that choice, but republicans do not share my values.

[Guest]

The problem is that even if Hilary goes to jail (she won't) the Democrats will still vote for her. They don't care if she is a felonious Mata Hari, they want to elect the first female president. But, it HAS to be a Democrat.

This from the party that hasn't won the women's vote since 1988. To what do you owe that accomplishment? Please tell us so we don't make the same mistakes.

[Guest]

I am not sure what it says about the women and democrats who would have an unethical, untrustworthy, unqualified candidate JUST BECAUSE IT HAPPENS TO BE A WOMAN!!!!!!

[Guest]

Trump is definitely the best option in the clown race.

[Guest]

This from the party that hasn't won the women's vote since 1988. To what do you owe that accomplishment? Please tell us so we don't make the same mistakes.

It appears that you are simply spewing from some left wing site.

Yes, you are correct IN GENERAL. HOWEVER, women tend to vote Democratic more because women in general like big government. It has nothing to do with women's issues, per se.

Also, while the Democratic women under 30 in the 2014 elections voted overwhelmingly Democratic 61-37 %, it was the slimmest margin since 1992.

They will NOT vote for Ms Clinton because she is a woman. And I think it would be insulting to all women to make that statement.

[Guest]

Biden has some real challenges ahead. First if he runs against Hillary he will be forced to explain if he believe Hillary can be trusted to run this country and certainly on her decision/judgment to operate a personal email server. If he waits it may be too late to gain traction. He, like Hillary will always be a part of the Obama decision making machine which hasn't worked out well at all

As to Hillary followers yes the would follow her to hell. Given the information the public has been given on her actions relating to the private email server there is sufficient documentation that she has committed criminal acts. But the progressive response is "yea she may be a crook but she's our crook."

As to the presidential campaign overall I am concerned that people are treating it as if they were viewing reality television and all this is for their amusement.

I don't like Trump and I don't like the way he campaigns but he has tapped into a gold mine because he is saying what is on voter's minds. It is over shadowing many candidates and that is not a good thing. The RNC has to handle Trump with kid gloves because he could go renegade (3rd party)

I am looking forward to the next debate.

Personal Best Regards:

[Guest]

Biden has some real challenges ahead. First if he runs against Hillary he will be forced to explain if he believe Hillary can be trusted to run this country and certainly on her decision/judgment to operate a personal email server. If he waits it may be too late to gain traction. He, like Hillary will always be a part of the Obama decision making machine which hasn't worked out well at all

As to Hillary followers yes the would follow her to hell. Given the information the public has been given on her actions relating to the private email server there is sufficient documentation that she has committed criminal acts. But the progressive response is "yea she may be a crook but she's our crook."

As to the presidential campaign overall I am concerned that people are treating it as if they were viewing reality television and all this is for their amusement.

I don't like Trump and I don't like the way he campaigns but he has tapped into a gold mine because he is saying what is on voter's minds. It is over shadowing many candidates and that is not a good thing. The RNC has to handle Trump with kid gloves because he could go renegade (3rd party)

I am looking forward to the next debate.

Personal Best Regards:

Totally agree.

[Guest]

A lot of civilians do not know how the gov handles classified material. The State Dept has primarily two email systems/Internet systems. One is the Unclassified network, which is basically your typical public Internet. It is used with gov servers to handle basic everyday gov work activity. Overseas, foreign nationals work along side of us on these Unclass systems. They are restricted from working with classified material/documents to the category of FOUO and SBU, which is For Official Use Only and Sensitive But Unclassified. The other network that the State Dept utilizes is the Classified network. All workstations and hard copy material of a classified nature, Confidential, Secret and Top Secret is kept in restricted areas, guarded by USMC guards. TS material is also kept in SCIFs, which are Sensitive Compartmentalized Information Facilities. Basically, they are vaults. Foreign nationals and uncleared Americans are restricted from these areas. Some American embassy personnel are cleared up to confidential, some secret and a very few are cleared for Top Secret. Top Secret/SCI is even more restricted and requires an extensive back ground investigation. There are also different other caveats so to speak attached to TS, which are code word designations. These are special and require SCI clearance and you have to be read in to those programs. NO ONE is allowed to store classified information in their home. All classified storage areas have to be certified on an annual basis and has to be guarded by persons cleared for that level. Classified information is encrypted and transmitted via the classified network using that encryption media. It is impossible for that information to get from a classified network to a classified network without someone manually doing physical transfer of the decrypted media. The only way you could do such a thing is purposely. Normally, only spies have perpetrated information in that manner.

Hilary had TS/SCI information on her home computer, which was open to those servicing her system. Hilary transferred TS information on an unclassified system, which is a violation of federal law and espionage statutes. If the gov wishes, they could put her away for a very long time. She has violated some laws that even the worst spies didn't perpetrate. I am very, very surprised that she isn't incarcerated right now. They are treating her as if she is Royalty. I find it astonishing that she is even seen on TV. I have seen folks disappear into the justice system for less that she is alleged to have done. And by all evidence revealed, I can only conclude that she is being special treatment in difference to Bill, a former president.

[Guest]

A lot of civilians do not know how the gov handles classified material. The State Dept has primarily two email systems/Internet systems. One is the Unclassified network, which is basically your typical public Internet. It is used with gov servers to handle basic everyday gov work activity. Overseas, foreign nationals work along side of us on these Unclass systems. They are restricted from working with classified material/documents to the category of FOUO and SBU, which is For Official Use Only and Sensitive But Unclassified. The other network that the State Dept utilizes is the Classified network. All workstations and hard copy material of a classified nature, Confidential, Secret and Top Secret is kept in restricted areas, guarded by USMC guards. TS material is also kept in SCIFs, which are Sensitive Compartmentalized Information Facilities. Basically, they are vaults. Foreign nationals and uncleared Americans are restricted from these areas. Some American embassy personnel are cleared up to confidential, some secret and a very few are cleared for Top Secret. Top Secret/SCI is even more restricted and requires an extensive back ground investigation. There are also different other caveats so to speak attached to TS, which are code word designations. These are special and require SCI clearance and you have to be read in to those programs. NO ONE is allowed to store classified information in their home. All classified storage areas have to be certified on an annual basis and has to be guarded by persons cleared for that level. Classified information is encrypted and transmitted via the classified network using that encryption media. It is impossible for that information to get from a classified network to a classified network without someone manually doing physical transfer of the decrypted media. The only way you could do such a thing is purposely. Normally, only spies have perpetrated information in that manner.

Hilary had TS/SCI information on her home computer, which was open to those servicing her system. Hilary transferred TS information on an unclassified system, which is a violation of federal law and espionage statutes. If the gov wishes, they could put her away for a very long time. She has violated some laws that even the worst spies didn't perpetrate. I am very, very surprised that she isn't incarcerated right now. They are treating her as if she is Royalty. I find it astonishing that she is even seen on TV. I have seen folks disappear into the justice system for less that she is alleged to have done. And by all evidence revealed, I can only conclude that she is being special treatment in difference to Bill, a former president.

The politicians have ciecled the wagons to protect their own. And Obama is most definitely flying cover for her in the event he needs her slippery, unethical abilities for his POTUS after life.