Here is another in one's pick of many articles about the witchy-bitchy Clinton. And even her aids seem to think they are above the little people as well:

'Don't you know who I am?' How Hillary's 'arrogant' aide Huma Abedin - now in the crosshairs of Servergate - tried to force her way past Secret Service agents without ID and expected them to carry her luggage | Daily Mail Online

After a Clinton supporter reads this article, please be so knind as to why you think this phony should be the democratic candidate?

Originally Posted by Guest

Here is another in one's pick of many articles about the witchy-bitchy Clinton. And even her aids seem to think they are above the little people as well:

'Don't you know who I am?' How Hillary's 'arrogant' aide Huma Abedin - now in the crosshairs of Servergate - tried to force her way past Secret Service agents without ID and expected them to carry her luggage | Daily Mail Online

After a Clinton supporter reads this article, please be so knind as to why you think this phony should be the democratic candidate?

I'm sure that they will divert with something that Romney or Bush did when they were kids. Or, Sarah Palin is still useful if they dust her off and use her as a target. The one I enjoy the best was when the liberals claimed Palin had a boob job. I finally found some interest in political debate.

I love the part about the SS agent being quoted as saying if they get assigned Clinton detail, it's considered a form of punishment.

Thec Daily Mail is a tabloid, right up there with the National Enquirer., not a credible news source. But I guess people believe what they want to, irregardless of the facts.

Originally Posted by Guest

Thec Daily Mail is a tabloid, right up there with the National Enquirer., not a credible news source. But I guess people believe what they want to, irregardless of the facts.

As predictable as the rain in FL!!!

And if this was the only place Clinton and her assistant were being presented as with-bitches but it is not. She is portrayed exactly the same way in many, many articles in exactly the same manner with quotes from secret service, military and law enforcement and how she treats them all with dis-respect.

So nice try at attempting to digress away from the subject.

Originally Posted by Guest

Here is another in one's pick of many articles about the witchy-bitchy Clinton. And even her aids seem to think they are above the little people as well:

'Don't you know who I am?' How Hillary's 'arrogant' aide Huma Abedin - now in the crosshairs of Servergate - tried to force her way past Secret Service agents without ID and expected them to carry her luggage | Daily Mail Online

After a Clinton supporter reads this article, please be so knind as to why you think this phony should be the democratic candidate?

I'm sure that the Secret Service agent recognized Huma Abedin. Just about everyone knows who she is, she is the one that married the pervert, Anthony "My package doesn't get enough attention" Weiner.

Originally Posted by Guest

Thec Daily Mail is a tabloid, right up there with the National Enquirer., not a credible news source. But I guess people believe what they want to, irregardless of the facts.

Ha, ha, ha, I knew it!!

Originally Posted by Guest

Here is another in one's pick of many articles about the witchy-bitchy Clinton. And even her aids seem to think they are above the little people as well:

'Don't you know who I am?' How Hillary's 'arrogant' aide Huma Abedin - now in the crosshairs of Servergate - tried to force her way past Secret Service agents without ID and expected them to carry her luggage | Daily Mail Online

After a Clinton supporter reads this article, please be so knind as to why you think this phony should be the democratic candidate?

Uh-Oh, that immediately disqualifies Mrs C. Are you really that scared of her?

Originally Posted by Guest

Uh-Oh, that immediately disqualifies Mrs C. Are you really that scared of her?

Yep, I am. She scares me at how she callously disregards national security. It also worries me that she treats her staff and others around her with disdain. She is a very ugly person and not up to my standards of an honorable president. If you can settle for her, then I wouldn't trust you either.

Originally Posted by Guest

Uh-Oh, that immediately disqualifies Mrs C. Are you really that scared of her?

Anybody who is not afraid of the bad guy (generic) has no sense. She has been proven time and again to be a bad person. Disrespectful to everybody and anybody except herself!!

In keeping with the theme of the thread, the more one reads about Clinton, rather than start another Clinton thread.

In this morning's National Journal there is an article by Molly Mirhashem about the feminists movement in America from one's eye.
She and the person she is writing about state there are many differences in what feminism means to each person.

Here is a quote from the article describing her thoughts on Clinton's view of feminism:

"And Hillary Clinton came to look like the symbol of an older generation of women more concerned with female empowerment—in particular, with white, middle-class, American female empowerment—than with broader issues of social and economic justice."

How accurate is that? 100% based on some of the reactions on this forum!

I look at it this way. If Clinton was half of what some say she is....or if she was really better than most of what she is accused, there would be an abundance of writings about it. But there is not. The reasoning is obvious. What is being said about her is over whelmingly true.

If the feminists want to put another notch on their pistol it is too bad they elected to use a loser.

This is what happens when money and power lead the rank and file instead of the rank and file making their determination of who they can be proud to represent them and have confidence in their candidate.

Clinton will not be their candidate (thank GOD).

Hillary needs to hire Monica to her team of misfits, somebody that can get the job done or get raise Johnson!

Forget all the bluster from the Clintonites. common sense dictates that Hillary was the custodian of all information/communication received and passed along in connection with the people's business conducted at the State Department. She made claim the server was secured but by whom? Further who cleared all the people with access to this server?

We all know what is going on here its all about stalling dragging their feet hoping they can delay any action until after the election.

Frankly i am tired of the people circling the wagons for politicians...if they did wrong bounce them for God sake because the only one being hurt are voters/taxpayers

It was predictable that Obama was going to be a disaster and it is obvious that clinton will be no better

Personal Best Regards:

In the 80's, my office did an investigation (along with the FBI) that uncovered a Fed Gov employee in Suitland, MD that had a file cabinet full of classified documents and Satellite photos in his home. He was getting ready to leave the gov and was attempting to get employment with Jane's, as in Jane's fighting ships, published in London. He was doing some free lance work writing for them in his spare time. He was arrested and sentenced to a long stay at one of our federal institutions.

Originally Posted by Guest

Forget all the bluster from the Clintonites. common sense dictates that Hillary was the custodian of all information/communication received and passed along in connection with the people's business conducted at the State Department. She made claim the server was secured but by whom? Further who cleared all the people with access to this server?

We all know what is going on here its all about stalling dragging their feet hoping they can delay any action until after the election.

Frankly i am tired of the people circling the wagons for politicians...if they did wrong bounce them for God sake because the only one being hurt are voters/taxpayers

It was predictable that Obama was going to be a disaster and it is obvious that clinton will be no better

Personal Best Regards:

I don't think they can delay long enough frankly.

This morning the New York Times has an article concerning Biden's investigation into running and financing, etc.

This was part of that article...

"At the same time, some Democrats supporting Mrs. Clinton have quietly signaled that they would re-evaluate their support if Mr. Biden joined the race. For example, Tom Daschle, an influential former Senate Democratic leader who has given the maximum amount allowable to Mrs. Clinton’s campaign, has indicated that he would reassess his position if Mr. Biden entered the race, according to people who have been in contact with him in recent days."

http://www.nytimes.com/2015/08/22/us...aign.html?_r=0