Falling Poll Numbers

[Guest]

Well, it seems as though the American public has had enough of several Regressives such as Graham, Bush, and Santorum. Very low numbers but these guys are continuing to stay in the race - to keep drawing money out of their PACS (?).

True, it is a long way until the convention but Americans have bailed on these jokers.

Trump has succeeded in splitting the Regressive Party and is handing the White House over to Democrats - AGAIN! Was that the plan all along? Hmmmm?

[Guest]

Well, it seems as though the American public has had enough of several Regressives such as Graham, Bush, and Santorum. Very low numbers but these guys are continuing to stay in the race - to keep drawing money out of their PACS (?).

True, it is a long way until the convention but Americans have bailed on these jokers.

Trump has succeeded in splitting the Regressive Party and is handing the White House over to Democrats - AGAIN! Was that the plan all along? Hmmmm?

Another Huffington Post follower. Try to use your own mind for a change. I realize that would be difficult for you considering you have been taught to be a follower and let the gov take care of you.

Regressive = becoming less advanced; returning to a former or less developed state.

Liberals= socialist
Socialism : a political and economic theory of social organization that advocates that the means of production, distribution, and exchange should be owned or regulated by the community as a whole.
synonyms: leftism, welfarism; More
radicalism, progressivism, social democracy;
communism, Marxism, labor movement
policy or practice based on the political and economic theory of socialism.
synonyms: leftism, welfarism; More
radicalism, progressivism, social democracy;
communism, Marxism, labor movement
(in Marxist theory) a transitional social state between the overthrow of capitalism and the realization of communism.

"Modern socialism originated from an 18th-century intellectual and working-class political movement that criticised the effects of industrialisation and private property on society"


So, in truth it is the liberals/socialists that are the "regressives" not the Republicans.

But today's liberals/socialists are kept completely and blindly in the dark by their masters. Yes, masters. After all, your party is the part of Slaves.

So, if you are going to post with your derisive remarks, at least have some substance or facts to make your comments a bit more credible. Perhaps you would be better at convincing school kids of your progressive (ha, ha) theories. We'll keep your secret for you, that your ideas are OLD and FAILED ideology that is recycled with a new label.

If you are going to parrot Huffington Post's direction to label conservatives with the label "regressive" you might want to add a bit of your own research before blindly FOLLOWING a bunch of foreign losers.

Remember:
Socialism/liberalism is the ideology of Nazi Germany, the Soviet Union, etc and we see how that worked out. Nazis gone. USSR gone. Losers!!

[Guest]

Well, it seems as though the American public has had enough of several Regressives such as Graham, Bush, and Santorum. Very low numbers but these guys are continuing to stay in the race - to keep drawing money out of their PACS (?).

True, it is a long way until the convention but Americans have bailed on these jokers.

Trump has succeeded in splitting the Regressive Party and is handing the White House over to Democrats - AGAIN! Was that the plan all along? Hmmmm?

I believe we have enough GOP candidates in the race to sort through in order to get the best candidate eventually. At least we have some that are willing to run for public office. What do the socialists have? Oh yes, a criminal with no respect for national security(and a liar), an old man that is honest enough to admit he is a socialist, and possibly a Vice President that has to be coerced, enticed and begged to run. Not much of line up on your side. Kind of pathetic.

Republicans will start to cull some of the less favored candidates from the overwhelming crowd of participants to get to the final few. After all, we only need ONE for the general election. As it appears right now, the only candidate your side has, is a liar and thief that cares nothing for the country and treats her closest associates/staff like dirt. Not much of a selection, but you die hards will desperately cling to her so you can say "we had the first female president." You had the first black president and how did that work out for the country? You are still trying to defend him by blaming his failures on someone (anyone) else. So pathetic.

It's good that you can expend your frustration on an anonymous forum. It must be very embarrassing for you. Your only HOPE and CHANGE from one loser is to put your money on a totally despicable criminal with an ideology borrowed from a failed foreign social economic system. And it's those foreigners that are pulling the chains of your party, knowing it will eventually be the downfall of the most powerful nation in the world. Another "leading from behind" joke; another bunch of followers.

[Guest]

Well, it seems as though the American public has had enough of several Regressives such as Graham, Bush, and Santorum. Very low numbers but these guys are continuing to stay in the race - to keep drawing money out of their PACS (?).

True, it is a long way until the convention but Americans have bailed on these jokers.

Trump has succeeded in splitting the Regressive Party and is handing the White House over to Democrats - AGAIN! Was that the plan all along? Hmmmm?

And you tap into the "plan" !!

There was no PARTY PLAN as there was with the Democratic party.

A lot I do not care for, but the party that you applaud and bow to is one that I was a loyal member of, worked for and always felt was in the right.

Now, that party has been hijacked totally and completely and in fact is a controlling party which has lost sight of american ideals.

They now believe that they, and only they, feed the poor, they and only they support all races, they and only they support freedom of religion and have lost all sight of reality.

Allegiance to the party is the only thing that counts right now.

There is actual pride in their name calling...PRIDE.

Not the Democratic party that I knew and when I step back to see if maybe it is me and they have grown, I see how far they have rushed left to socialism, marxism and they are now becoming proud to associate with people and groups that in the past they would never do.

Why....for votes. control. power of the party.

[Guest]

Democratic party to
Democrat party to
Progressive party to
Liberalism - socialism

Next step in their evolution = Communism

(the war against religion has already started long ago)

[Guest]

Democratic party to
Democrat party to
Progressive party to
Liberalism - socialism

Next step in their evolution = Communism

(the war against religion has already started long ago)

[Guest]

One poster said "Socialism/liberalism is the ideology of Nazi Germany."

What the heck are you talking about? Nazi Germany was totally right wing reactionary politics. It was Tea Party on steroids (well, maybe baby aspirin).

Go back to your Political Science 101 and this time, read your books!!

[Guest]

Democratic party to
Democrat party to
Progressive party to
Liberalism - socialism

Next step in their evolution = Communism

(the war against religion has already started long ago)

You anti-liberals had best start talking to each other for your silly posts. One poster compared liberals to Nazi Germany and you are comparing to Communism. Two extreme opposites, sweetie. The Nazis were extreme reactionary right wingers, Communists in pure form (not found anywhere) are extreme left wingers.

Study up a little bit and you will see that Nazi Germany and Socialist Russia were enemies.
Like the other guy said, go back to Political Science 101, dearie, and pay attention this time. You just might learn something.

[Guest]

You anti-liberals had best start talking to each other for your silly posts. One poster compared liberals to Nazi Germany and you are comparing to Communism. Two extreme opposites, sweetie. The Nazis were extreme reactionary right wingers, Communists in pure form (not found anywhere) are extreme left wingers.

Study up a little bit and you will see that Nazi Germany and Socialist Russia were enemies.
Like the other guy said, go back to Political Science 101, dearie, and pay attention this time. You just might learn something.

Well, "sweetie"....

National Socialism (German: Nationalsozialismus), more commonly known as Nazism (/ˈnaːtsɪzᵊm/), was the ideology and practice of the German Nazi Party and of Nazi Germany as a whole, although it is sometimes applied to other far-right groups. Usually characterized as an offshoot of fascism that incorporates scientific racism and anti-Semitism, Nazism arose from Pan-Germanism, the Völkisch German nationalist movement, and the anti-communist Freikorps (Free Corps) after World War I.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nazism

[Guest]

I might add, that most are not "anti liberalism" as you say, but more oposed to the run to extreme extreme left (socialism and marxism).

Liberalism is not a threat nor do I know anyone who is anti liberal....

Just step back, if you can, and watch the speed in which "progressives" are moving to socialism

[Guest]

One poster said "Socialism/liberalism is the ideology of Nazi Germany."

What the heck are you talking about? Nazi Germany was totally right wing reactionary politics. It was Tea Party on steroids (well, maybe baby aspirin).

Go back to your Political Science 101 and this time, read your books!!

You have no idea what you're talking about and simply refer to the classical liberalized "Left/Right" view of totalitarian regimes. Prior to 1939, Adolph and Uncle Joe Stalin were best buddies which I always found ironic.


The Tea Party is against concentrated government power and in favor of constitutional restraints. It advocates he POLAR opposites of Nazi, Commie or Crazy (eg Venezuela, Syria, Obama, etc ) regimes. You should know that by now.

Stop reading "Think Progress" and other liberal rags and try to educate yourself before it's too late ... which is probably already is for you.

[Guest]

One poster said "Socialism/liberalism is the ideology of Nazi Germany."

What the heck are you talking about? Nazi Germany was totally right wing reactionary politics. It was Tea Party on steroids (well, maybe baby aspirin).

Go back to your Political Science 101 and this time, read your books!!

You're wrong. Go back to junior high civics and read YOUR BOOKS. What party were the Nazis?

"Under the leadership of Adolf Hitler (1889-1945), the National Socialist German Workers’ Party, or Nazi Party, grew into a mass movement and ruled Germany through totalitarian means from 1933 to 1945."
Nazi Party - World War II - HISTORY.com (http://www.history.com/topics/world-war-ii/nazi-party)

[Guest]

You have no idea what you're talking about and simply refer to the classical liberalized "Left/Right" view of totalitarian regimes. Prior to 1939, Adolph and Uncle Joe Stalin were best buddies which I always found ironic.


The Tea Party is against concentrated government power and in favor of constitutional restraints. It advocates he POLAR opposites of Nazi, Commie or Crazy (eg Venezuela, Syria, Obama, etc ) regimes. You should know that by now.

Stop reading "Think Progress" and other liberal rags and try to educate yourself before it's too late ... which is probably already is for you.

I bet if you liberals were half as smart as you believed, you would end up converting to conservatives. This is why conservatives look at liberals like they are the ignorant fools they prove themselves to be. You think you can make up for ignorance by being derisive. You only fool the young.

[Guest]

Well, it seems as though the American public has had enough of several Regressives such as Graham, Bush, and Santorum. Very low numbers but these guys are continuing to stay in the race - to keep drawing money out of their PACS (?).

True, it is a long way until the convention but Americans have bailed on these jokers.

Trump has succeeded in splitting the Regressive Party and is handing the White House over to Democrats - AGAIN! Was that the plan all along? Hmmmm?

Very un original party BS. How credible could much of anything be coming from the party that is sponsoring, supporting, paying for an unethical, untrustworthy loser.

[Guest]

You have no idea what you're talking about and simply refer to the classical liberalized "Left/Right" view of totalitarian regimes. Prior to 1939, Adolph and Uncle Joe Stalin were best buddies which I always found ironic.


The Tea Party is against concentrated government power and in favor of constitutional restraints. It advocates he POLAR opposites of Nazi, Commie or Crazy (eg Venezuela, Syria, Obama, etc ) regimes. You should know that by now.

Stop reading "Think Progress" and other liberal rags and try to educate yourself before it's too late ... which is probably already is for you.

:agree: There is just no excuse for ignorance with the availability of the Internet. I believe that is one liberal that won't be responding real fast.

[Guest]

:agree: There is just no excuse for ignorance with the availability of the Internet. I believe that is one liberal that won't be responding real fast.

Yes he will.

I doubt if he reads all of the posts. He simply looks for something that will allow an insult.

Believe me, my party...Democratic party....the party for whom I worked tirelessly has now become a very radical group, and has done such a good job with media that they are able to brainwash people like him, and they blindly follow.

When conservatives read these followers posting and implying that they and they alone care about the poor....that they and they alone care income equality....that they and they alone care about racial justice, and knowing that their reading is confined to places that imply that....conservatives don't care, but they, by fact give more of their money and time to needy...conservatives want police to kill blacks, when in fact that is blatantly untrue and has been proven over and over again, it just gets frustrating,

Conservatives are not smarter than liberals; in fact I find those two philosophies great and interesting.

I, however, cannot abide a blind following who follow their leaders into something that will lead to disaster. Is that my opinion, yep, BUT proven over and over and over. Socialism, communism, Marxism are all failed policies and that has become the Democratic Party.

The Democrats on here think that the conservative movement is moving far right. Sorry, the Democrats are moving so fast and so hard to the left, it just looks further away, when in fact the conservative side has not moved from our constitution, our laws and belief in God. That must look far away from so far to the left.

[Guest]

Yes he will.

I doubt if he reads all of the posts. He simply looks for something that will allow an insult.

Believe me, my party...Democratic party....the party for whom I worked tirelessly has now become a very radical group, and has done such a good job with media that they are able to brainwash people like him, and they blindly follow.

When conservatives read these followers posting and implying that they and they alone care about the poor....that they and they alone care income equality....that they and they alone care about racial justice, and knowing that their reading is confined to places that imply that....conservatives don't care, but they, by fact give more of their money and time to needy...conservatives want police to kill blacks, when in fact that is blatantly untrue and has been proven over and over again, it just gets frustrating,

Conservatives are not smarter than liberals; in fact I find those two philosophies great and interesting.

I, however, cannot abide a blind following who follow their leaders into something that will lead to disaster. Is that my opinion, yep, BUT proven over and over and over. Socialism, communism, Marxism are all failed policies and that has become the Democratic Party.

The Democrats on here think that the conservative movement is moving far right. Sorry, the Democrats are moving so fast and so hard to the left, it just looks further away, when in fact the conservative side has not moved from our constitution, our laws and belief in God. That must look far away from so far to the left.

Sorry, but the Democratic party of my father no longer exists. It is now referred to as the Democrat party, if we are being generous. As the liberal Democrat party, if irritated, and as socialists if we are being honest about it.
There were conservative democrats in the Democratic party, but they probably dies off or have moved to the Independent party. Why would decent Democrats from the old Democratic party want the stigma of associating with these socialists? Old line Democrats were patriots and some conservative. There was a fine line between the two parties in the old days.

[Guest]

Who is the biggest liar?

[Guest]

Who is the biggest liar?

Good question! Your choice, Obama or Hilary.

[Guest]

There is one overwhelming theme here. It is the Democrats are responsible for everything that has gone wrong, since 2000. That is right to include "W's" presidency. Which party is tearing itself apart from within?

The Tea Party isn't part of the problem. Then, why did Boehner leave? What happened to Eric Cantor? How many senate seats did the Democrats keep, because they ran against Tea Party Republicans. How many Republican senator didn't run for reelection, because of what the Senate turned into? Is there one moderate left in the Republican party? Look who is leading the polls in running for the Republican nomination!

If one of the three outsiders gets the nomination, and wins the presidency, how the hell are they going to govern, when their supporters don't want them too. All their supporters want to tear Washington apart, and blame someone else for it. Talk about taking a road to nowhere, this is the fast track to total lunacy.

Not one of you posting on this thread has even hinted that the Republicans in Congress have any responsibility for the current state of the government. Not one! So, why should anybody with an open mind take you seriously?

Look what Hitler did to turn the German economy around from the Great Depression, and out of control inflation caused by World War I pay back (printing money). If it wasn't for that World War II thing, and Jewish thing(lol), Hitler would be looked at differently. Building up a strong military certainly turned that country around. Socialists really liked a strong military. Which party is pushing for a strong military? This entire last paragraph was made in jest, but you see how easy it is to make the opposing party look just plain evil! All it requires is the have a house without mirrors.

[Guest]

There is one overwhelming theme here. It is the Democrats are responsible for everything that has gone wrong, since 2000. That is right to include "W's" presidency. Which party is tearing itself apart from within?

The Tea Party isn't part of the problem. Then, why did Boehner leave? What happened to Eric Cantor? How many senate seats did the Democrats keep, because they ran against Tea Party Republicans. How many Republican senator didn't run for reelection, because of what the Senate turned into? Is there one moderate left in the Republican party? Look who is leading the polls in running for the Republican nomination!

If one of the three outsiders gets the nomination, and wins the presidency, how the hell are they going to govern, when their supporters don't want them too. All their supporters want to tear Washington apart, and blame someone else for it. Talk about taking a road to nowhere, this is the fast track to total lunacy.

Not one of you posting on this thread has even hinted that the Republicans in Congress have any responsibility for the current state of the government. Not one! So, why should anybody with an open mind take you seriously?

Look what Hitler did to turn the German economy around from the Great Depression, and out of control inflation caused by World War I pay back (printing money). If it wasn't for that World War II thing, and Jewish thing(lol), Hitler would be looked at differently. Building up a strong military certainly turned that country around. Socialists really liked a strong military. Which party is pushing for a strong military? This entire last paragraph was made in jest, but you see how easy it is to make the opposing party look just plain evil! All it requires is the have a house without mirrors.

I'm not even going to respond to the rest of your rant. Suffice it to say that you have a problem with trying to defend your party and you seem to think that the Tea Party is the fault. At least you have "progressed" from blaming Bush.

The whole mirror thing is kind of funny. After all, I have always thought from the beginning that Obama was all smoke and mirrors. And add a bit of slight of hand.

[Guest]

Oh, and by the way, I am not a member of the Tea Party, but I totally support what they stand for. So, when you think you might disparage anyone by associating them with the TP, you are actually complimenting them.

[Guest]

There is one overwhelming theme here. It is the Democrats are responsible for everything that has gone wrong, since 2000. That is right to include "W's" presidency. Which party is tearing itself apart from within?

The Tea Party isn't part of the problem. Then, why did Boehner leave? What happened to Eric Cantor? How many senate seats did the Democrats keep, because they ran against Tea Party Republicans. How many Republican senator didn't run for reelection, because of what the Senate turned into? Is there one moderate left in the Republican party? Look who is leading the polls in running for the Republican nomination!

If one of the three outsiders gets the nomination, and wins the presidency, how the hell are they going to govern, when their supporters don't want them too. All their supporters want to tear Washington apart, and blame someone else for it. Talk about taking a road to nowhere, this is the fast track to total lunacy.

Not one of you posting on this thread has even hinted that the Republicans in Congress have any responsibility for the current state of the government. Not one! So, why should anybody with an open mind take you seriously?

Look what Hitler did to turn the German economy around from the Great Depression, and out of control inflation caused by World War I pay back (printing money). If it wasn't for that World War II thing, and Jewish thing(lol), Hitler would be looked at differently. Building up a strong military certainly turned that country around. Socialists really liked a strong military. Which party is pushing for a strong military? This entire last paragraph was made in jest, but you see how easy it is to make the opposing party look just plain evil! All it requires is the have a house without mirrors.

Your understanding of the "theme" as you refer to it is incredibly untrue and false. I can assure you that many people on this forum and on the past forum have criticized congress.

For myself, I opposed our current Presidents nomination strongly and his election although I posted many times that I felt the Republicans tickets were poor.

I did that on this forum along with others but you must have missed that.

I doubt you know but opening with that statement makes you feel in charge and then you can continue your lecture.

The Tea Party is a strong influence to be sure. I wonder if you even know what they stand for ???? I am not involved in nor do I support them in all their endeavors but they are not all racist, bigots of faggots or whatever vile name is used to describe them on here.

Congress is at fault, most recently by allowing the WH to dictate to them. The House and Senate became Republican but you would never know. THAT is the fault of the Republicans and kudos to the WH for sticking to their guns and doing what they wanted.

To blame any one party for the problem in congress is just foolish. Anyone who does so is not very well read.

The problem comes directly from the WH.

Listen, I decided when he was elected to see how this goes and frankly at the beginning I was a bit excited at his handling of the financial crisis.

He lost me, and I think the entire Republican party with the attitude conveyed and the trickery involved in the ACA. It simply got worse after than and the Republicans in congress just allowed it. People elected the Republicans to congressional control and he continued....kudos to the WH and boos to the Republicans.

It has gotten so bad with the move to Socialism, communism and marxism and the bad mouthing by the WH of anyone who does not agree with him...well, you are seeing the results in the polls.

Your preaching, as untrue as its basis is, fall on deaf ears. If you knew anything, you would understand that the election is over a year away...that not one single VOTE has been cast, that the field is so large that nobody has had the opportunity to even lay out programs. We are in that stage where you just want to get noticed.

I leave you with a few links that talk to the move so far extreme left by the Democrat party is it scary....all from the last few months....

Have Democrats Pulled Too Far Left? | RealClearPolitics (http://www.realclearpolitics.com/2015/05/27/have_democrats_pulled_too_far_left_357862.html)

http://www.nytimes.com/2015/05/27/opinion/have-democrats-pulled-too-far-left.html

Jim Webb: Democratic Party has 'moved way far to the left' | MSNBC (http://www.msnbc.com/msnbc/jim-webb-democratic-party-has-moved-way-far-the-left)

Just last week, one of the party favorites Elizabeth Warren gave her blessing to to Black Lives Matter, a marxist inspired group as if it were the only group looking for justice or as if the Democratic party was the only party that supports those in poverty (conservatives by fact give more money and time to the underprivileged)

Elizabeth Warren just gave the speech that Black Lives Matter activists have been waiting for - The Washington Post (http://www.washingtonpost.com/news/post-politics/wp/2015/09/27/elizabeth-warren-just-gave-the-speech-that-black-lives-matter-activists-have-been-waiting-for/)

Your party has been taken over by radical left wing groups.....that is nothing but fact.

I understand the problems with conservatives as well, but given the choice I will elect to stay with groups who believe in the constitution, the rule of law and such things.

PLEASE, I do not know you, but you sound like you think you are smart but I am afraid that unsupported claims of superiority do not impress me.

[Guest]

You're wrong. Go back to junior high civics and read YOUR BOOKS. What party were the Nazis?

"Under the leadership of Adolf Hitler (1889-1945), the National Socialist German Workers’ Party, or Nazi Party, grew into a mass movement and ruled Germany through totalitarian means from 1933 to 1945."
Nazi Party - World War II - HISTORY.com (http://www.history.com/topics/world-war-ii/nazi-party)

Get some help, dolt. What was East Germany called? It was the DDR or German Democratic Republic. Was it a democratic system of government? Of course not.

The National Socialist German Workers Party was not Socialist at all. It was a dictatorship with the Tea Party hero of Adolf Hitler at the dictator..

[Guest]

Your understanding of the "theme" as you refer to it is incredibly untrue and false. I can assure you that many people on this forum and on the past forum have criticized congress.

For myself, I opposed our current Presidents nomination strongly and his election although I posted many times that I felt the Republicans tickets were poor.

I did that on this forum along with others but you must have missed that.

I doubt you know but opening with that statement makes you feel in charge and then you can continue your lecture.

The Tea Party is a strong influence to be sure. I wonder if you even know what they stand for ???? I am not involved in nor do I support them in all their endeavors but they are not all racist, bigots of faggots or whatever vile name is used to describe them on here.

Congress is at fault, most recently by allowing the WH to dictate to them. The House and Senate became Republican but you would never know. THAT is the fault of the Republicans and kudos to the WH for sticking to their guns and doing what they wanted.

To blame any one party for the problem in congress is just foolish. Anyone who does so is not very well read.

The problem comes directly from the WH.

Listen, I decided when he was elected to see how this goes and frankly at the beginning I was a bit excited at his handling of the financial crisis.

He lost me, and I think the entire Republican party with the attitude conveyed and the trickery involved in the ACA. It simply got worse after than and the Republicans in congress just allowed it. People elected the Republicans to congressional control and he continued....kudos to the WH and boos to the Republicans.

It has gotten so bad with the move to Socialism, communism and marxism and the bad mouthing by the WH of anyone who does not agree with him...well, you are seeing the results in the polls.

Your preaching, as untrue as its basis is, fall on deaf ears. If you knew anything, you would understand that the election is over a year away...that not one single VOTE has been cast, that the field is so large that nobody has had the opportunity to even lay out programs. We are in that stage where you just want to get noticed.

I leave you with a few links that talk to the move so far extreme left by the Democrat party is it scary....all from the last few months....

Have Democrats Pulled Too Far Left? | RealClearPolitics (http://www.realclearpolitics.com/2015/05/27/have_democrats_pulled_too_far_left_357862.html)

http://www.nytimes.com/2015/05/27/opinion/have-democrats-pulled-too-far-left.html

Jim Webb: Democratic Party has 'moved way far to the left' | MSNBC (http://www.msnbc.com/msnbc/jim-webb-democratic-party-has-moved-way-far-the-left)

Just last week, one of the party favorites Elizabeth Warren gave her blessing to to Black Lives Matter, a marxist inspired group as if it were the only group looking for justice or as if the Democratic party was the only party that supports those in poverty (conservatives by fact give more money and time to the underprivileged)

Elizabeth Warren just gave the speech that Black Lives Matter activists have been waiting for - The Washington Post (http://www.washingtonpost.com/news/post-politics/wp/2015/09/27/elizabeth-warren-just-gave-the-speech-that-black-lives-matter-activists-have-been-waiting-for/)

Your party has been taken over by radical left wing groups.....that is nothing but fact.

I understand the problems with conservatives as well, but given the choice I will elect to stay with groups who believe in the constitution, the rule of law and such things.

PLEASE, I do not know you, but you sound like you think you are smart but I am afraid that unsupported claims of superiority do not impress me.

My party has been taken over by radical left wing groups. I am a moderate independent. I have no party! I am going to vote for John Kasich in the Fl. primary, so I am going to be a Republican. Did you listen to John Kasich in the last debate? Every time he spoke not a peep out of the crowd. This is the person with experience in Washington, and running a major state, and no one wants to listen to him. I wonder why?

I asked a lot of questions. You didn't answer any of them. Not one! You ever hear of "guilt by silence". You know what the problem is with the conservatives. How about sharing it with someone not as gifted as you? Since when is asking questions, preaching?

You referred to the same article twice. I guess it was so good it was worth repeating. Come on man! An article written a person that worked for the last three republican administrations, and you don't think that it is going to be one sided.

"Clinton instituted three strikes and you are out, and proposed adding 100,000 police officers." Mass incarnation was a result of what he did. Clinton is admitting the policies have caused problems. Obama is addressing those problem. I will copy and paste Clinton's views now on the next post.

"Obama is more liberal than Clinton on gay rights, religious liberties, abortion rights, drug legalization, and climate control." No kidding. The country has moved on almost all of these items.

"Clinton cut spending, and produced a surplus. Under Obama spending and deficits reached record levels". What shape was the country in when Clinton took office versus Obama took office? If you going to compare people, you have to start on a level playing field. Figures lie, and liars figure. That is exactly what Wehner did played with numbers to support his argument.

What do you think would happen, if you compared any of the Republicans running for congress to President Reagan? They have moved so far to the right that it is scary.

Concerning the Tea Party, they are nothing, but noise. Boehner didn't want to listen to them any more. Ted Cruz is probably the only one in the Senate that they support. Boehner called him a jackass. They are less than 10% in the House. Have anyone of them proposed anything other than repealing ACA 54 times? Boehner asked them for a replacement. Their response according to Boehner was "it's too hard".


The president of the Village's Tea Party wrote an article where she called Obama use of "fast track" as an unthinkable overreach by our current president. It's unconstitutional. Fast track was used by very Republican president, since Reagan. Did the Constitution change when Obama became president?

Concerning Black Lives Matter, they are not Marxists. They are the worst kind of racists. When that lady jumped on stage at a Sander's event, he should have smacked her in the head.

"It has gotten so bad with the move to Socialism, communism and Marxism" That statement is total nonsense. How about supporting that with facts?

Start with explaining how the ACA is a left wing socialist program that has its roots in the Heritage Foundation, and Romneycare! I really would like you to explain that one. According to you I am really stupid, so go into simple detail.

Of course my comments are falling on deaf ears, because you refuse to listen. I am an moderate independent, but everyone that doesn't agree with everything you say is a left wing liberal. No, we know who the problem is here.

[Guest]

This is one of the article concerning Clinton's view of mass jailings.

Bill Clinton says he made mass incarceration issue worse - CNNPolitics.com (http://www.cnn.com/2015/07/15/politics/bill-clinton-1994-crime-bill/index.html)

[Guest]

Dear Guests: I thought the topic was falling poll numbers but all the chatter has come down to bet my dad can beat up your dad up (ie party politics)

The sad fact in my view has been that our political system needs to rid itself of parasites. What candidate is best suited for that task? The polls mean little now and even at their best reveal the most popular because voters will not take the time to read anything more than tag lines and as a result choose poorly.

It seems that too many on Political Talk argue with the logic like those political talkers on The View or The Talk and that is sad.

The underlying problem is that too many voters won't set party aside and focus on the issues trying to understand the effect such policy will have on this nation. Too many voters treat party like gang members treat their gangs. What happened to individualism in this nation?

We need to come together and the only way that is going to happen is that both sides have to come to some compromise/agreement as to which candidate can bring this country together and back on the path to prosperity an greatness

Personal Best Regards:

[Guest]

Get some help, dolt. What was East Germany called? It was the DDR or German Democratic Republic. Was it a democratic system of government? Of course not.

The National Socialist German Workers Party was not Socialist at all. It was a dictatorship with the Tea Party hero of Adolf Hitler at the dictator..

What a stupid statement. You can't refute the correction I made so you attempt an insult. Says a lot about you and your socialist party. The Nazi part was socialist whether you say so or not. Even the name. And as far as attempting to slur by using the Tea Party, good luck. All you are doing is making a fool of yourself. You can't tell anyone what you find wrong with the Tea Party. Why? Because you don't know anything about them or what they stand for.

Like I said before, I am not a member of the TP, but I do agree with almost everything they stand for. So, associate me with the TP all you want, because I enjoy the compliments.

By the way, you really should look up more information on socialism, so that you don't look the fool when spewing your verbal vomit.

[Guest]

My party has been taken over by radical left wing groups. I am a moderate independent. I have no party! I am going to vote for John Kasich in the Fl. primary, so I am going to be a Republican. Did you listen to John Kasich in the last debate? Every time he spoke not a peep out of the crowd. This is the person with experience in Washington, and running a major state, and no one wants to listen to him. I wonder why?

I asked a lot of questions. You didn't answer any of them. Not one! You ever hear of "guilt by silence". You know what the problem is with the conservatives. How about sharing it with someone not as gifted as you? Since when is asking questions, preaching?

You referred to the same article twice. I guess it was so good it was worth repeating. Come on man! An article written a person that worked for the last three republican administrations, and you don't think that it is going to be one sided.

"Clinton instituted three strikes and you are out, and proposed adding 100,000 police officers." Mass incarnation was a result of what he did. Clinton is admitting the policies have caused problems. Obama is addressing those problem. I will copy and paste Clinton's views now on the next post.

"Obama is more liberal than Clinton on gay rights, religious liberties, abortion rights, drug legalization, and climate control." No kidding. The country has moved on almost all of these items.

"Clinton cut spending, and produced a surplus. Under Obama spending and deficits reached record levels". What shape was the country in when Clinton took office versus Obama took office? If you going to compare people, you have to start on a level playing field. Figures lie, and liars figure. That is exactly what Wehner did played with numbers to support his argument.

What do you think would happen, if you compared any of the Republicans running for congress to President Reagan? They have moved so far to the right that it is scary.

Concerning the Tea Party, they are nothing, but noise. Boehner didn't want to listen to them any more. Ted Cruz is probably the only one in the Senate that they support. Boehner called him a jackass. They are less than 10% in the House. Have anyone of them proposed anything other than repealing ACA 54 times? Boehner asked them for a replacement. Their response according to Boehner was "it's too hard".


The president of the Village's Tea Party wrote an article where she called Obama use of "fast track" as an unthinkable overreach by our current president. It's unconstitutional. Fast track was used by very Republican president, since Reagan. Did the Constitution change when Obama became president?

Concerning Black Lives Matter, they are not Marxists. They are the worst kind of racists. When that lady jumped on stage at a Sander's event, he should have smacked her in the head.

"It has gotten so bad with the move to Socialism, communism and Marxism" That statement is total nonsense. How about supporting that with facts?

Start with explaining how the ACA is a left wing socialist program that has its roots in the Heritage Foundation, and Romneycare! I really would like you to explain that one. According to you I am really stupid, so go into simple detail.

Of course my comments are falling on deaf ears, because you refuse to listen. I am an moderate independent, but everyone that doesn't agree with everything you say is a left wing liberal. No, we know who the problem is here.

I've liked Kasich from the start, but he is not getting the support he needs to make it to the primary. To be honest with you, I don't think he will make it. It's too bad, because he is so much more experienced than any of the other candidates.

[Guest]

Get some help, dolt. What was East Germany called? It was the DDR or German Democratic Republic. Was it a democratic system of government? Of course not.

The National Socialist German Workers Party was not Socialist at all. It was a dictatorship with the Tea Party hero of Adolf Hitler at the dictator..

Actually, the DDR was SOCIALIST, so your argument in without merit. You do realize that you just associated the label "Democratic" with socialism again, right?

[Guest]

Thank you. Now we can add the DDR to the list:

Nazi = socialist
USSR = socialist

DDR and socialist

Please continue to fortify that post at your leisure.

[Guest]

My party has been taken over by radical left wing groups. I am a moderate independent. I have no party! I am going to vote for John Kasich in the Fl. primary, so I am going to be a Republican. Did you listen to John Kasich in the last debate? Every time he spoke not a peep out of the crowd. This is the person with experience in Washington, and running a major state, and no one wants to listen to him. I wonder why?

I asked a lot of questions. You didn't answer any of them. Not one! You ever hear of "guilt by silence". You know what the problem is with the conservatives. How about sharing it with someone not as gifted as you? Since when is asking questions, preaching?

You referred to the same article twice. I guess it was so good it was worth repeating. Come on man! An article written a person that worked for the last three republican administrations, and you don't think that it is going to be one sided.

"Clinton instituted three strikes and you are out, and proposed adding 100,000 police officers." Mass incarnation was a result of what he did. Clinton is admitting the policies have caused problems. Obama is addressing those problem. I will copy and paste Clinton's views now on the next post.

"Obama is more liberal than Clinton on gay rights, religious liberties, abortion rights, drug legalization, and climate control." No kidding. The country has moved on almost all of these items.

"Clinton cut spending, and produced a surplus. Under Obama spending and deficits reached record levels". What shape was the country in when Clinton took office versus Obama took office? If you going to compare people, you have to start on a level playing field. Figures lie, and liars figure. That is exactly what Wehner did played with numbers to support his argument.

What do you think would happen, if you compared any of the Republicans running for congress to President Reagan? They have moved so far to the right that it is scary.

Concerning the Tea Party, they are nothing, but noise. Boehner didn't want to listen to them any more. Ted Cruz is probably the only one in the Senate that they support. Boehner called him a jackass. They are less than 10% in the House. Have anyone of them proposed anything other than repealing ACA 54 times? Boehner asked them for a replacement. Their response according to Boehner was "it's too hard".


The president of the Village's Tea Party wrote an article where she called Obama use of "fast track" as an unthinkable overreach by our current president. It's unconstitutional. Fast track was used by very Republican president, since Reagan. Did the Constitution change when Obama became president?

Concerning Black Lives Matter, they are not Marxists. They are the worst kind of racists. When that lady jumped on stage at a Sander's event, he should have smacked her in the head.

"It has gotten so bad with the move to Socialism, communism and Marxism" That statement is total nonsense. How about supporting that with facts?

Start with explaining how the ACA is a left wing socialist program that has its roots in the Heritage Foundation, and Romneycare! I really would like you to explain that one. According to you I am really stupid, so go into simple detail.

Of course my comments are falling on deaf ears, because you refuse to listen. I am an moderate independent, but everyone that doesn't agree with everything you say is a left wing liberal. No, we know who the problem is here.

With all due respect, you lost all credibility with your "theme" remark which is hogwash totally.

You have no idea of what you are speaking of and please please spare us your little oft repeated speech about party. You are one of the most anti Republican, pro democratic posters on here with no doubt.

And your comment on Tea Party.....please without referring to the leftist notes, tell us what you think the Tea Party stands for and what about it you do not like ?

If we had ignore, you would make that list for sure.

[Guest]

If I may add, my comment on being democrat was not meant to disparage Democrats in anyway. It was meant to disparage you as a poster and your huypocrisy

[Guest]

If I may add, my comment on being democrat was not meant to disparage Democrats in anyway. It was meant to disparage you as a poster and your huypocrisy

and an embarassment to most democrats.

[Guest]

With all due respect, you lost all credibility with your "theme" remark which is hogwash totally.

You have no idea of what you are speaking of and please please spare us your little oft repeated speech about party. You are one of the most anti Republican, pro democratic posters on here with no doubt.

And your comment on Tea Party.....please without referring to the leftist notes, tell us what you think the Tea Party stands for and what about it you do not like ?

If we had ignore, you would make that list for sure.

You, sir, are operating without a clue. How many questions have I asked, and how many have you answered? The second part of the questions is real easy. That would be none.

I have a playbook. Well, yours is very clear. Never answer any questions. Never accept responsibility for anything. Always try to degrade anyone that doesn't agree with you. In other words, act like a three year old, and you excel at it.

So I am an anti Republican, but I intend to vote for John Kasich. That is nice trick. Please explain to me, how that is possible? Damn, another question that you can't answer.

Take a damn good look at most of the Republicans posts on this forum, and tell me that most of them are not over the top partisan. Any attempt to bring them back to the center is considered left wing liberal nonsense.

[Guest]

You, sir, are operating without a clue. How many questions have I asked, and how many have you answered? The second part of the questions is real easy. That would be none.

I have a playbook. Well, yours is very clear. Never answer any questions. Never accept responsibility for anything. Always try to degrade anyone that doesn't agree with you. In other words, act like a three year old, and you excel at it.

So I am an anti Republican, but I intend to vote for John Kasich. That is nice trick. Please explain to me, how that is possible? Damn, another question that you can't answer.

Take a damn good look at most of the Republicans posts on this forum, and tell me that most of them are not over the top partisan. Any attempt to bring them back to the center is considered left wing liberal nonsense.

You do have a problem with vocabulary, don't you? Have you ever posted a comment that didn't use some vulgar or demeaning verbiage? Oops, a question, and we know how you hate answering questions. Do you really think anyone believes your "I'm a gonna voter fer Kasich?" You know as well as I do that Kasich has no chance in this race. It's pretty fair bet on your part that you can say "well he ain't thar so I be gonna vote for a socialist." Yep, I am making fun of you, because you are so easy to read.

[Guest]

Take a damn good look at most of the Republicans posts on this forum, and tell me that most of them are not over the top partisan. Any attempt to bring them back to the center is considered left wing liberal nonsense.

Of course we are partisan. Just like you are partisan. You act like that is unusual. Talk about those without a clue.

Bring us back to "center?" Why would we want to be center? That's moderate, luke warm, temperate, etc. We need extreme now to fix what Obama has hosed up. Obama has done more damage to our country than WWI, WWII and the depression did combined. Congratulations liberals, you have almost gotten your anarchy you yearn for.

[Guest]

You, sir, are operating without a clue. How many questions have I asked, and how many have you answered? The second part of the questions is real easy. That would be none.

I have a playbook. Well, yours is very clear. Never answer any questions. Never accept responsibility for anything. Always try to degrade anyone that doesn't agree with you. In other words, act like a three year old, and you excel at it.

So I am an anti Republican, but I intend to vote for John Kasich. That is nice trick. Please explain to me, how that is possible? Damn, another question that you can't answer.

Take a damn good look at most of the Republicans posts on this forum, and tell me that most of them are not over the top partisan. Any attempt to bring them back to the center is considered left wing liberal nonsense.

I want to be very careful how I say this, because there is a group who likes to say that the Republicans on here bully them, and for all I know you are one of them...fits your tone.

Problem is you IGNORE issues and talk in such generalities it is very difficult to respond to you and you turn every response you get into an attack about some questions you never even ask.

Now you can label me a Tea Party bigot....a Tea Party racist....a Tea Party faggot....all familiar terms.

And stealing a page from you....what specific Tea Party belief are you opposed to ?

[Guest]

I want to be very careful how I say this, because there is a group who likes to say that the Republicans on here bully them, and for all I know you are one of them...fits your tone.

Problem is you IGNORE issues and talk in such generalities it is very difficult to respond to you and you turn every response you get into an attack about some questions you never even ask.

Now you can label me a Tea Party bigot....a Tea Party racist....a Tea Party faggot....all familiar terms.

And stealing a page from you....what specific Tea Party belief are you opposed to ?

He's never answered that question yet. None of the liberals that slur the TP have ever been able to answer that question. To answer it the way they would like, would to be admitting that they are UN-American with Anti-American ideology. Because there is not one item that the TP stands for that is not Constitutional and American. They tried to push the racist thing but found out that the only occurrence of a racist placard was staged by liberals. And they are the ones that beat up a black TP member at a town hall meeting.

[Guest]

He's never answered that question yet. None of the liberals that slur the TP have ever been able to answer that question. To answer it the way they would like, would to be admitting that they are UN-American with Anti-American ideology. Because there is not one item that the TP stands for that is not Constitutional and American. They tried to push the racist thing but found out that the only occurrence of a racist placard was staged by liberals. And they are the ones that beat up a black TP member at a town hall meeting.

The whole lot of you are too funny. You have never answered any of my questions, but I am suppose to answer yours? Why, because you are you? I didn't know that all of you commanded so much respect.

Obama has screwed up everything. The Republicans have nothing to do with the current state of affairs in Washington. I don't know how any one of you can say that with a straight face.

Is that right John Kasich has no chance? Why! He has experience both in Washington, and running a state. He accepted the Medicaid portion of ACA against the wishes of the republicans in his state. What a crime it is accepting a program that helps the poor. He can and will work with the Democrats to restore sanity back to Washington, and that is his biggest sin. Which party is the problem?

You can tag me with anything that you want, but we all know why. Anyone that doesn't agree is the enemy. Concerning name calling, take a damn good look at my posts, and the responses. Have you ever seen one that didn't contain a comment meant to demean me? That's is what you do, and are not very good at it.

[Guest]

The whole lot of you are too funny. You have never answered any of my questions, but I am suppose to answer yours? Why, because you are you? I didn't know that all of you commanded so much respect.

Obama has screwed up everything. The Republicans have nothing to do with the current state of affairs in Washington. I don't know how any one of you can say that with a straight face.

Is that right John Kasich has no chance? Why! He has experience both in Washington, and running a state. He accepted the Medicaid portion of ACA against the wishes of the republicans in his state. What a crime it is accepting a program that helps the poor. He can and will work with the Democrats to restore sanity back to Washington, and that is his biggest sin. Which party is the problem?

You can tag me with anything that you want, but we all know why. Anyone that doesn't agree is the enemy. Concerning name calling, take a damn good look at my posts, and the responses. Have you ever seen one that didn't contain a comment meant to demean me? That's is what you do, and are not very good at it.

We don't answer your questions because yours don't have anything to do with the thread, and because your questions are just your attempt to bait and divert. And your questions are lame anyway. As your mentor Pelosi once said, you're just "astro turf."

So, if you can't answer the same TP question that has been thrown at you a million times, then why don't you take your slurs and run home.

[Guest]

We don't answer your questions because yours don't have anything to do with the thread, and because your questions are just your attempt to bait and divert. And your questions are lame anyway. As your mentor Pelosi once said, you're just "astro turf."

So, if you can't answer the same TP question that has been thrown at you a million times, then why don't you take your slurs and run home.

Good post.

Stand by for another lecture on how everyone here will not blame congress or blame Republicans....he thinks this because he does not read and just wants to bait.

Included in his response will be how he will answer no questions because..whatever the soup of the day might be.

And of course, his shot at Tea Party for which he can supply no reason, I xcept they won't vote how he wishes them to.

[Guest]

We don't answer your questions because yours don't have anything to do with the thread, and because your questions are just your attempt to bait and divert. And your questions are lame anyway. As your mentor Pelosi once said, you're just "astro turf."

So, if you can't answer the same TP question that has been thrown at you a million times, then why don't you take your slurs and run home.

My questions don't have anything to do with the thread "falling poll numbers". Your question about what the Tea Party stands for is right on point of this thread. I asked several questions that were right on point about the Tea Party affect on the Republican Party, and you didn't answer. I wonder why? Is it that the truth hurts?

That is all you have to know about the Tea Party. The Constitution, that they always tout, states that the majority rules. They are not in the majority, but want to get their way on everything. If they don't get their way, they make it difficult, if not impossible, to get anything done. That is what the Tea Party is. They always want to take their ball, and go home. If we don't get our way, we are going to shut down the government. How many times have they threaten that.?

[Guest]

My questions don't have anything to do with the thread "falling poll numbers". Your question about what the Tea Party stands for is right on point of this thread. I asked several questions that were right on point about the Tea Party affect on the Republican Party, and you didn't answer. I wonder why? Is it that the truth hurts?

That is all you have to know about the Tea Party. The Constitution, that they always tout, states that the majority rules. They are not in the majority, but want to get their way on everything. If they don't get their way, they make it difficult, if not impossible, to get anything done. That is what the Tea Party is. They always want to take their ball, and go home. If we don't get our way, we are going to shut down the government. How many times have they threaten that.?

Read and learn


"Even though nearly every politician, teacher, journalist and citizen believes that our Founders created a democracy, it is absolutely not true. The Founders knew full well the differences between a Republic and a Democracy. They repeatedly and emphatically said that they had founded a Republic.

Article IV Section 4, of the Constitution "guarantees to every state in this union a Republican form of government".... Conversely, the word Democracy is not mentioned even once in the Constitution. Madison warned us of the dangers of democracies with these words,

"Democracies have ever been spectacles of turbulence and contention; have ever been found incompatible with personal security or the rights of property; and have in general been as short in their lives as they have been violent in their deaths...",
"We may define a republic to be ... a government which derives all its powers directly or indirectly from the great body of the people, and is administered by persons holding their offices during pleasure for a limited period, or during good behavior. It is essential to such a government that it be derived from the great body of the society, not from an inconsiderable proportion or a favored class of it; otherwise a handful of tyrannical nobles, exercising their oppressions by a delegation of their powers, might aspire to the rank of republicans and claim for their government the honorable title of republic." James Madison, Federalist No. 10, (1787)

"A wise man will not leave the right to the mercy of chance, nor wish it to prevail through the power of the majority. There is but little virtue in the action of masses of men." Henry David Thoreau (1817-1862)"

Republic vs. Democracy (http://www.c4cg.org/republic.htm)


"

[Guest]

Tea Party members of congress were elected within their state and are subject to more voting based on what they do.

Tea Party members are voting how they vote because the people elected them to do just that.

[Guest]

My questions don't have anything to do with the thread "falling poll numbers". Your question about what the Tea Party stands for is right on point of this thread. I asked several questions that were right on point about the Tea Party affect on the Republican Party, and you didn't answer. I wonder why? Is it that the truth hurts?

That is all you have to know about the Tea Party. The Constitution, that they always tout, states that the majority rules. They are not in the majority, but want to get their way on everything. If they don't get their way, they make it difficult, if not impossible, to get anything done. That is what the Tea Party is. They always want to take their ball, and go home. If we don't get our way, we are going to shut down the government. How many times have they threaten that.?

First the Tea Party, perhaps the official members, may not have a distinct majority but listen up.....the conservative Republican party does hold a very wide advantage in both houses of congress. They keep being by passed by our President, and I will leave it to the constitutional scholars as to how much that has hurt this country.

To you I want to say that I, personally am tired of you playing the poor soul. You keep harping and harping how the big bad Republicans on here do not give our President any credit.

Have you read any of the threads on economics ? Have you heard much, you will find some, criticism of him in the arena of economics ?

Basically, he is being criticized soundly for foreign affairs and his total lack of any statesmanship both national or international.

Listen, grow up...HE IS THE PRESIDENT. When have you ever heard of a President not being criticized ? I am sick of the "oh poor me" attitude when he is criticized. I am tired of the bringing out all the nasty, silly phrases because he is criticized ?

So please stop the oh poor me stuff......if you do not like the Tea Party and a strict interpetion of the constitution, then say so and explain why, but do not always use the backdrop of how unfair everyone is to the President.

Discuss issues. I do not think, and I could be wrong, see your post on any of the threads concerning the Syria situation, the emergence of the group Black Lives Matter from the marxist roots, the bypassing of congress on a number of issues, the fact that no matter what we do in the USA, it has NO CHANCE of effecting anything at all relative to the environment. You harp on only one issue pretty much and we are faced with so many things in this country...if the Tea Party and a perception of the President being picked on are what you car about, you will not get a lot of traction on this or any other forum.

[Guest]

First the Tea Party, perhaps the official members, may not have a distinct majority but listen up.....the conservative Republican party does hold a very wide advantage in both houses of congress. They keep being by passed by our President, and I will leave it to the constitutional scholars as to how much that has hurt this country.

To you I want to say that I, personally am tired of you playing the poor soul. You keep harping and harping how the big bad Republicans on here do not give our President any credit.

Have you read any of the threads on economics ? Have you heard much, you will find some, criticism of him in the arena of economics ?

Basically, he is being criticized soundly for foreign affairs and his total lack of any statesmanship both national or international.

Listen, grow up...HE IS THE PRESIDENT. When have you ever heard of a President not being criticized ? I am sick of the "oh poor me" attitude when he is criticized. I am tired of the bringing out all the nasty, silly phrases because he is criticized ?

So please stop the oh poor me stuff......if you do not like the Tea Party and a strict interpetion of the constitution, then say so and explain why, but do not always use the backdrop of how unfair everyone is to the President.

Discuss issues. I do not think, and I could be wrong, see your post on any of the threads concerning the Syria situation, the emergence of the group Black Lives Matter from the marxist roots, the bypassing of congress on a number of issues, the fact that no matter what we do in the USA, it has NO CHANCE of effecting anything at all relative to the environment. You harp on only one issue pretty much and we are faced with so many things in this country...if the Tea Party and a perception of the President being picked on are what you car about, you will not get a lot of traction on this or any other forum.

Here is your Tea Party background.https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tea_Party_movement

[Guest]

First the Tea Party, perhaps the official members, may not have a distinct majority but listen up.....the conservative Republican party does hold a very wide advantage in both houses of congress. They keep being by passed by our President, and I will leave it to the constitutional scholars as to how much that has hurt this country.

To you I want to say that I, personally am tired of you playing the poor soul. You keep harping and harping how the big bad Republicans on here do not give our President any credit.

Have you read any of the threads on economics ? Have you heard much, you will find some, criticism of him in the arena of economics ?

Basically, he is being criticized soundly for foreign affairs and his total lack of any statesmanship both national or international.



Listen, grow up...HE IS THE PRESIDENT. When have you ever heard of a President not being criticized ? I am sick of the "oh poor me" attitude when he is criticized. I am tired of the bringing out all the nasty, silly phrases because he is criticized ?

So please stop the oh poor me stuff......if you do not like the Tea Party and a strict interpetion of the constitution, then say so and explain why, but do not always use the backdrop of how unfair everyone is to the President.

Discuss issues. I do not think, and I could be wrong, see your post on any of the threads concerning the Syria situation, the emergence of the group Black Lives Matter from the marxist roots, the bypassing of congress on a number of issues, the fact that no matter what we do in the USA, it has NO CHANCE of effecting anything at all relative to the environment. You harp on only one issue pretty much and we are faced with so many things in this country...if the Tea Party and a perception of the President being picked on are what you car about, you will not get a lot of traction on this or any other forum.

Take your poor soul nonsense, and stick it. This coming from a victim of the crimes against humanity perpetrated by Obama. That is precious.

Have I ever heard of a president being criticized? Of course, I have. Have you ever heard of a party writing a letter to an enemy leader telling him to ignore an agreement negotiated by six countries which we were one? The people that wrote the letter hadn't even seen the agreement. Open you bleepin eyes.

You want to talk about Syria start here.
John Kerry: Critics of Obama's Syria decision are 'dead wrong' - POLITICO (http://www.politico.com/story/2015/09/john-kerry-syria-strikes-chemical-weapons-defends-no-strike-214199)

The Republicans were not going to approve the red in drawn in the sand. Take a look at the foreign section of the Tea Party article from Wikipedia. They were against sending the military into Syria. They keep on criticizing Obama for not holding true on his red line in the sand. That is the height of hypocrisy.

Concerning the article above, Kerry was grilled on Morning Joe by a female "W" press spokesman. He wasn't given a free ride on anything that he said. The questions concerning Syria were right on point.

He also said that, if Assad keep his chemical weapons, ISIS would be in possession of them now. Working together with Russia got the chemical weapons out of there. Since that was the goal, what the hell is the problem?

Obama bypassed Congress on immigration reform. The Senate approved bipartisan immigration bill, and not one that had several Republican votes, so it could be called bipartisan. The Hastert rule prevented Boehner from putting the bill on the floor for a vote. There was a general feeling that the bill would have passed. When it was clear that the House wasn't going to act, the president did.

Take a look at the economics section of the Wikipedia report on the Tea Party. The Tea Party was against "W's" bailing out the big banks. Do they have any idea what would have happen, if he allowed the banks to fail?

[Guest]

Take your poor soul nonsense, and stick it. This coming from a victim of the crimes against humanity perpetrated by Obama. That is precious.

Have I ever heard of a president being criticized? Of course, I have. Have you ever heard of a party writing a letter to an enemy leader telling him to ignore an agreement negotiated by six countries which we were one? The people that wrote the letter hadn't even seen the agreement. Open you bleepin eyes.

You want to talk about Syria start here.
John Kerry: Critics of Obama's Syria decision are 'dead wrong' - POLITICO (http://www.politico.com/story/2015/09/john-kerry-syria-strikes-chemical-weapons-defends-no-strike-214199)

The Republicans were not going to approve the red in drawn in the sand. Take a look at the foreign section of the Tea Party article from Wikipedia. They were against sending the military into Syria. They keep on criticizing Obama for not holding true on his red line in the sand. That is the height of hypocrisy.

Concerning the article above, Kerry was grilled on Morning Joe by a female "W" press spokesman. He wasn't given a free ride on anything that he said. The questions concerning Syria were right on point.

He also said that, if Assad keep his chemical weapons, ISIS would be in possession of them now. Working together with Russia got the chemical weapons out of there. Since that was the goal, what the hell is the problem?

Obama bypassed Congress on immigration reform. The Senate approved bipartisan immigration bill, and not one that had several Republican votes, so it could be called bipartisan. The Hastert rule prevented Boehner from putting the bill on the floor for a vote. There was a general feeling that the bill would have passed. When it was clear that the House wasn't going to act, the president did.

Take a look at the economics section of the Wikipedia report on the Tea Party. The Tea Party was against "W's" bailing out the big banks. Do they have any idea what would have happen, if he allowed the banks to fail?

I am done with this guy...thats it...he can chortle to himself.

He just wanders all over the lot with little phrases. I am done with this guy.

Only thing that I compliment is his passion about supporting this administration....love the passion, think he is mostly wrong however.

[Guest]

I am done with this guy...thats it...he can chortle to himself.

He just wanders all over the lot with little phrases. I am done with this guy.

Only thing that I compliment is his passion about supporting this administration....love the passion, think he is mostly wrong however.

Thank you for ignoring me.

I am all over the place. Maybe, because I take guilt by silence seriously. Trying to answer all the stupid questions thrown me has me all over the place, because it is impossible to tie anyone here down to one subject.

As soon as you push them into a corner, they either disappear or change the subject. Have you ever noticed how many threads I have ended?

Gandhi said the following, "First they ignore you, then they make fun of you, then they fight you, then you win". I am not patting myself on the back. I am laughing at you, because this really applies here.

It would nice once just once someone here gave the president credit for something positive that has happened in the past 6+ years, but we know that is not going to happen. If you are talking about the passion, how about the passion of never giving Obama credit for anything!

[Guest]

Thank you for ignoring me.

I am all over the place. Maybe, because I take guilt by silence seriously. Trying to answer all the stupid questions thrown me has me all over the place, because it is impossible to tie anyone here down to one subject.

As soon as you push them into a corner, they either disappear or change the subject. Have you ever noticed how many threads I have ended?

Gandhi said the following, "First they ignore you, then they make fun of you, then they fight you, then you win". I am not patting myself on the back. I am laughing at you, because this really applies here.

It would nice once just once someone here gave the president credit for something positive that has happened in the past 6+ years, but we know that is not going to happen. If you are talking about the passion, how about the passion of never giving Obama credit for anything!

Once again, you must be told.

I have been here for the entire 6 1/2 years and he HAS gotten credit, especially regarding economical issues.

This is the beginning of an election cycle and most of the posts concern his 1) leadership style and 2)foreign policy.

You are simply looking for a way to pat him on the back and criticize anything that opposes him.

And yes, I think everyone notices how you shut down threads, but not for the reason you think.

[Guest]

Thank you for ignoring me.

I am all over the place. Maybe, because I take guilt by silence seriously. Trying to answer all the stupid questions thrown me has me all over the place, because it is impossible to tie anyone here down to one subject.

As soon as you push them into a corner, they either disappear or change the subject. Have you ever noticed how many threads I have ended?

Gandhi said the following, "First they ignore you, then they make fun of you, then they fight you, then you win". I am not patting myself on the back. I am laughing at you, because this really applies here.

It would nice once just once someone here gave the president credit for something positive that has happened in the past 6+ years, but we know that is not going to happen. If you are talking about the passion, how about the passion of never giving Obama credit for anything!

Why don't you just change from your PJ's into your school clothes and get moving. You don't want to be late for school Maybe you will learn something IF you shut your mouth and listen instead of running amok with your verbal vomit. I realize that the don't teach civics anymore, but I am sure that there is someone that can teach you something of American government. Maybe not. Most teachers in public schools are brainwashed liberals.

At any rate, since you still don't know anything about the Tea Party, you might want to use Google and study up a bit. You look the fool when you get on here attempting to bait and challenge when you know nothing but what some loser has told you.

Goodbye and have a great day at school. Be careful using the boy's room, that you don't get bullied out of your lunch money.

[Guest]

" Have you ever noticed how many threads I have ended?"


Yes we have. Stink does have a tendency to clear a room.

[Guest]

Another Huffington Post follower. Try to use your own mind for a change. I realize that would be difficult for you considering you have been taught to be a follower and let the gov take care of you.

Regressive = becoming less advanced; returning to a former or less developed state.

Liberals= socialist
Socialism : a political and economic theory of social organization that advocates that the means of production, distribution, and exchange should be owned or regulated by the community as a whole.
synonyms: leftism, welfarism; More
radicalism, progressivism, social democracy;
communism, Marxism, labor movement
policy or practice based on the political and economic theory of socialism.
synonyms: leftism, welfarism; More
radicalism, progressivism, social democracy;
communism, Marxism, labor movement
(in Marxist theory) a transitional social state between the overthrow of capitalism and the realization of communism.

"Modern socialism originated from an 18th-century intellectual and working-class political movement that criticised the effects of industrialisation and private property on society"


So, in truth it is the liberals/socialists that are the "regressives" not the Republicans.

But today's liberals/socialists are kept completely and blindly in the dark by their masters. Yes, masters. After all, your party is the part of Slaves.

So, if you are going to post with your derisive remarks, at least have some substance or facts to make your comments a bit more credible. Perhaps you would be better at convincing school kids of your progressive (ha, ha) theories. We'll keep your secret for you, that your ideas are OLD and FAILED ideology that is recycled with a new label.

If you are going to parrot Huffington Post's direction to label conservatives with the label "regressive" you might want to add a bit of your own research before blindly FOLLOWING a bunch of foreign losers.

Remember:
Socialism/liberalism is the ideology of Nazi Germany, the Soviet Union, etc and we see how that worked out. Nazis gone. USSR gone. Losers!!

6 million Jewish people died because of the media leading them during the holocaust! Communism does not work! Wake up America ...Trump is GODs trump card!

[Guest]

6 million Jewish people died because of the media leading them during the holocaust! Communism does not work! Wake up America ...Trump is GODs trump card!

Mr Trump is not the answer to anything.

Please the Republican Party is going to blow such an opportunity if the do not get off this guys bandwagon.

You complain about the guy in the WH for pandering....that is exactly what Trump is doing. He would be great in a bar room conversation, where facts are less important than mouth.

[Guest]

Mr Trump is not the answer to anything.

Please the Republican Party is going to blow such an opportunity if the do not get off this guys bandwagon.

You complain about the guy in the WH for pandering....that is exactly what Trump is doing. He would be great in a bar room conversation, where facts are less important than mouth.

Your words are empty to the Christian and the Jewish!

[Guest]

Your words are empty to the Christian and the Jewish!

My words are empty to many I fear !

However, with pretty much total certainty I feel comfortable telling you that you surely do not want him as your President, and since you see things in a religious scene, please, please do some reading.

Trump is selling...that is what he does. YOU are being sold !

[Guest]

My words are empty to many I fear !

However, with pretty much total certainty I feel comfortable telling you that you surely do not want him as your President, and since you see things in a religious scene, please, please do some reading.

Trump is selling...that is what he does. YOU are being sold !

Trump is selling freedom!!! His heart is for an America that he grew up in! The people have no other hope but Trump! There are a couple or good ones but they will never make president and the lying media will do anything to get them nominated and then smash them and we are left with communism!

[Guest]

Mr Trump is not the answer to anything.

Please the Republican Party is going to blow such an opportunity if the do not get off this guys bandwagon.

You complain about the guy in the WH for pandering....that is exactly what Trump is doing. He would be great in a bar room conversation, where facts are less important than mouth.

:agree: :thumbup:

[Guest]

Your words are empty to the Christian and the Jewish!

A REAL Christian can see through Trump. And I doubt seriously your statement regarding the Jews. From what I have seen, Jews don't like him and probably never did.

Trump is just as bad or almost as bad as Obama. No use going through that again.

[Guest]

A REAL Christian can see through Trump. And I doubt seriously your statement regarding the Jews. From what I have seen, Jews don't like him and probably never did.

Trump is just as bad or almost as bad as Obama. No use going through that again.

Did you watch the video? No he is the only republican that can win that will keep us free - of course there are others that are running to follow the adgenda - America is on to the game!

[Guest]

Trump is selling freedom!!! His heart is for an America that he grew up in! The people have no other hope but Trump! There are a couple or good ones but they will never make president and the lying media will do anything to get them nominated and then smash them and we are left with communism!

You got that right, Trump is selling our freedom AWAY. Any logical thinking person can see that Trump is NOT what he claims. And now we are starting to see the real Trump as some of that shine starts to wear away.

He wants Socialized medicine. == Liberal/socialist
He wants to completely stop taxing anyone making less than $50K and tax the rich more == Buying 50% of the voters, like liberals do with their handouts.

If you dig into some of the things he has said in the past, and who he associates with, you will see that he has more in common with Democrats than Republicans.

We have a lot of better choices on the Republican side. We don't need someone that we can't trust 100%. Why take the chance with him? He is nothing more than a loud horn, loud obnoxious noise.

[Guest]

Did you watch the video? No he is the only republican that can win that will keep us free - of course there are others that are running to follow the adgenda - America is on to the game!

The democrats would like for us to believe this. I will bet Trump could get more Democrat votes than Republican. He has more in common with them.

[Guest]

Did you watch the video? No he is the only republican that can win that will keep us free - of course there are others that are running to follow the adgenda - America is on to the game!

you sound like that obnoxious liberal troll that frequents this forum. No.....he can spell better.

[Guest]

Ultimately the primary voters will decide whether they want Trump or not. It is up to the other candidates to provide a better message. I generally prefer not to tell people who they want as President. Trump has apparently hit a nerve with people as he is polling well. Once the first primaries roll around we will see where everyone actually stands.

My words are empty to many I fear !

However, with pretty much total certainty I feel comfortable telling you that you surely do not want him as your President, and since you see things in a religious scene, please, please do some reading.

Trump is selling...that is what he does. YOU are being sold !

[Guest]

Democratic party to
Democrat party to
Progressive party to
Liberalism - socialism

Next step in their evolution = Communism

(the war against religion has already started long ago)

You guys sound like a broken record. Baloney!

[Guest]

You guys sound like a broken record. Baloney!

The socialist movement does not necessarily agree....

"The Latin American left has had some success during the past decade limiting the ravages of neoliberal capitalism. In contrast, European social democracy and its distant cousin, United States liberalism, have mostly adopted a “third way” that has cut back on labor rights, deregulated finance, and curtailed public provision. The austerity politics of both the right and the moderate left have forced ordinary people to bear the costs of the global economic crisis rather than the irresponsible corporate elites who caused it. But grassroots resistance to austerity has spread, beginning with the Spanish indignados and the Occupy movement in the United States. Podemos in Spain and Syriza in Greece are electoral expressions of this new left. And now in the United States, the most anti-socialist of capitalist societies, an explicit democratic socialist, Senator Bernie Sanders (a political independent from the small rural state of Vermont) has emerged as the major challenger to former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton for the 2016 Democratic presidential nomination.

The source of the above....

DEMOCRATIC SOCIALIST OF AMERICA

The Sanders Campaign and the Revival of Socialism in the United States - Democratic Socialists of America (http://www.dsausa.org/the_sanders_campaign_and_the_revival_of_socialism_ in_the_united_states)

[Guest]

The democrats would like for us to believe this. I will bet Trump could get more Democrat votes than Republican. He has more in common with them.

Yes I agree. I see where the Teamsters want to meet with him and could possibly endorse him.

Trump will not parrot the GOP establishment line ... hmm, is that a bad thing?

[Guest]

I just visited the COMMUNIST PARTY OF AMERICA website...

Home » cpusa (http://www.cpusa.org/)

Interesting on the side of the front page is a link to GET INVOLVED. If you click on it and see all the issues they are strongly involved in, it actually looks like the platform of the new Democratic party.

[Guest]

I just visited the COMMUNIST PARTY OF AMERICA website...

Home » cpusa (http://www.cpusa.org/)

Interesting on the side of the front page is a link to GET INVOLVED. If you click on it and see all the issues they are strongly involved in, it actually looks like the platform of the new Democratic party.

Not surprised. The uninformed (less I say idiots) are being blindly led by the socialists. It's easy to entice the lazy that want to take from the earners. That's why I said before, the Democratic party is gone. The new Democrat party is in reality, the Socialist party of liberals. I like to label them correctly as Dem-erals. Socialism is the enemy of American Freedom and we fought wars against it. Now, the now generation is so uneducated and stupid that the lazy way of having the gov make ALL their decisions for them, seems like the best/easiest way. Then you have the oblivious Democrats that will just vote Dem because that is what they are registered as. They will continue to play shuffleboard and bridge, not realizing that their old Democratic party has been eaten away like cancer, by the socialists.

[Guest]

I just visited the COMMUNIST PARTY OF AMERICA website...

Home » cpusa (http://www.cpusa.org/)

Interesting on the side of the front page is a link to GET INVOLVED. If you click on it and see all the issues they are strongly involved in, it actually looks like the platform of the new Democratic party.

It's interesting how the Commies always lie and prevaricate ...

from their FAQ on the website:

"...In contrast, Communists seek to change society peacefully. We work to expand every democratic and electoral avenue as part of our fight for working class political and economic power."

The communist party has killed untold tens of millions in Russia and Chinas alone ... probably close to 100 million. But, hey, no violence ... my a**