Well, it seems as though the American public has had enough of several Regressives such as Graham, Bush, and Santorum. Very low numbers but these guys are continuing to stay in the race - to keep drawing money out of their PACS (?).

True, it is a long way until the convention but Americans have bailed on these jokers.

Trump has succeeded in splitting the Regressive Party and is handing the White House over to Democrats - AGAIN! Was that the plan all along? Hmmmm?

Originally Posted by Guest

Well, it seems as though the American public has had enough of several Regressives such as Graham, Bush, and Santorum. Very low numbers but these guys are continuing to stay in the race - to keep drawing money out of their PACS (?).

True, it is a long way until the convention but Americans have bailed on these jokers.

Trump has succeeded in splitting the Regressive Party and is handing the White House over to Democrats - AGAIN! Was that the plan all along? Hmmmm?

Another Huffington Post follower. Try to use your own mind for a change. I realize that would be difficult for you considering you have been taught to be a follower and let the gov take care of you.

Regressive = becoming less advanced; returning to a former or less developed state.

Liberals= socialist
Socialism : a political and economic theory of social organization that advocates that the means of production, distribution, and exchange should be owned or regulated by the community as a whole.
synonyms: leftism, welfarism; More
radicalism, progressivism, social democracy;
communism, Marxism, labor movement
policy or practice based on the political and economic theory of socialism.
synonyms: leftism, welfarism; More
radicalism, progressivism, social democracy;
communism, Marxism, labor movement
(in Marxist theory) a transitional social state between the overthrow of capitalism and the realization of communism.

"Modern socialism originated from an 18th-century intellectual and working-class political movement that criticised the effects of industrialisation and private property on society"


So, in truth it is the liberals/socialists that are the "regressives" not the Republicans.

But today's liberals/socialists are kept completely and blindly in the dark by their masters. Yes, masters. After all, your party is the part of Slaves.

So, if you are going to post with your derisive remarks, at least have some substance or facts to make your comments a bit more credible. Perhaps you would be better at convincing school kids of your progressive (ha, ha) theories. We'll keep your secret for you, that your ideas are OLD and FAILED ideology that is recycled with a new label.

If you are going to parrot Huffington Post's direction to label conservatives with the label "regressive" you might want to add a bit of your own research before blindly FOLLOWING a bunch of foreign losers.

Remember:
Socialism/liberalism is the ideology of Nazi Germany, the Soviet Union, etc and we see how that worked out. Nazis gone. USSR gone. Losers!!

Originally Posted by Guest

Well, it seems as though the American public has had enough of several Regressives such as Graham, Bush, and Santorum. Very low numbers but these guys are continuing to stay in the race - to keep drawing money out of their PACS (?).

True, it is a long way until the convention but Americans have bailed on these jokers.

Trump has succeeded in splitting the Regressive Party and is handing the White House over to Democrats - AGAIN! Was that the plan all along? Hmmmm?

I believe we have enough GOP candidates in the race to sort through in order to get the best candidate eventually. At least we have some that are willing to run for public office. What do the socialists have? Oh yes, a criminal with no respect for national security(and a liar), an old man that is honest enough to admit he is a socialist, and possibly a Vice President that has to be coerced, enticed and begged to run. Not much of line up on your side. Kind of pathetic.

Republicans will start to cull some of the less favored candidates from the overwhelming crowd of participants to get to the final few. After all, we only need ONE for the general election. As it appears right now, the only candidate your side has, is a liar and thief that cares nothing for the country and treats her closest associates/staff like dirt. Not much of a selection, but you die hards will desperately cling to her so you can say "we had the first female president." You had the first black president and how did that work out for the country? You are still trying to defend him by blaming his failures on someone (anyone) else. So pathetic.

It's good that you can expend your frustration on an anonymous forum. It must be very embarrassing for you. Your only HOPE and CHANGE from one loser is to put your money on a totally despicable criminal with an ideology borrowed from a failed foreign social economic system. And it's those foreigners that are pulling the chains of your party, knowing it will eventually be the downfall of the most powerful nation in the world. Another "leading from behind" joke; another bunch of followers.

Originally Posted by Guest

Well, it seems as though the American public has had enough of several Regressives such as Graham, Bush, and Santorum. Very low numbers but these guys are continuing to stay in the race - to keep drawing money out of their PACS (?).

True, it is a long way until the convention but Americans have bailed on these jokers.

Trump has succeeded in splitting the Regressive Party and is handing the White House over to Democrats - AGAIN! Was that the plan all along? Hmmmm?

And you tap into the "plan" !!

There was no PARTY PLAN as there was with the Democratic party.

A lot I do not care for, but the party that you applaud and bow to is one that I was a loyal member of, worked for and always felt was in the right.

Now, that party has been hijacked totally and completely and in fact is a controlling party which has lost sight of american ideals.

They now believe that they, and only they, feed the poor, they and only they support all races, they and only they support freedom of religion and have lost all sight of reality.

Allegiance to the party is the only thing that counts right now.

There is actual pride in their name calling...PRIDE.

Not the Democratic party that I knew and when I step back to see if maybe it is me and they have grown, I see how far they have rushed left to socialism, marxism and they are now becoming proud to associate with people and groups that in the past they would never do.

Why....for votes. control. power of the party.

Democratic party to
Democrat party to
Progressive party to
Liberalism - socialism

Next step in their evolution = Communism

(the war against religion has already started long ago)

Democratic party to
Democrat party to
Progressive party to
Liberalism - socialism

Next step in their evolution = Communism

(the war against religion has already started long ago)

One poster said "Socialism/liberalism is the ideology of Nazi Germany."

What the heck are you talking about? Nazi Germany was totally right wing reactionary politics. It was Tea Party on steroids (well, maybe baby aspirin).

Go back to your Political Science 101 and this time, read your books!!

Originally Posted by Guest

Democratic party to
Democrat party to
Progressive party to
Liberalism - socialism

Next step in their evolution = Communism

(the war against religion has already started long ago)

You anti-liberals had best start talking to each other for your silly posts. One poster compared liberals to Nazi Germany and you are comparing to Communism. Two extreme opposites, sweetie. The Nazis were extreme reactionary right wingers, Communists in pure form (not found anywhere) are extreme left wingers.

Study up a little bit and you will see that Nazi Germany and Socialist Russia were enemies.
Like the other guy said, go back to Political Science 101, dearie, and pay attention this time. You just might learn something.

Originally Posted by Guest

You anti-liberals had best start talking to each other for your silly posts. One poster compared liberals to Nazi Germany and you are comparing to Communism. Two extreme opposites, sweetie. The Nazis were extreme reactionary right wingers, Communists in pure form (not found anywhere) are extreme left wingers.

Study up a little bit and you will see that Nazi Germany and Socialist Russia were enemies.
Like the other guy said, go back to Political Science 101, dearie, and pay attention this time. You just might learn something.

Well, "sweetie"....

National Socialism (German: Nationalsozialismus), more commonly known as Nazism (/ˈnaːtsɪzᵊm/), was the ideology and practice of the German Nazi Party and of Nazi Germany as a whole, although it is sometimes applied to other far-right groups. Usually characterized as an offshoot of fascism that incorporates scientific racism and anti-Semitism, Nazism arose from Pan-Germanism, the Völkisch German nationalist movement, and the anti-communist Freikorps (Free Corps) after World War I.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nazism

I might add, that most are not "anti liberalism" as you say, but more oposed to the run to extreme extreme left (socialism and marxism).

Liberalism is not a threat nor do I know anyone who is anti liberal....

Just step back, if you can, and watch the speed in which "progressives" are moving to socialism

Originally Posted by Guest

One poster said "Socialism/liberalism is the ideology of Nazi Germany."

What the heck are you talking about? Nazi Germany was totally right wing reactionary politics. It was Tea Party on steroids (well, maybe baby aspirin).

Go back to your Political Science 101 and this time, read your books!!

You have no idea what you're talking about and simply refer to the classical liberalized "Left/Right" view of totalitarian regimes. Prior to 1939, Adolph and Uncle Joe Stalin were best buddies which I always found ironic.


The Tea Party is against concentrated government power and in favor of constitutional restraints. It advocates he POLAR opposites of Nazi, Commie or Crazy (eg Venezuela, Syria, Obama, etc ) regimes. You should know that by now.

Stop reading "Think Progress" and other liberal rags and try to educate yourself before it's too late ... which is probably already is for you.

Originally Posted by Guest

One poster said "Socialism/liberalism is the ideology of Nazi Germany."

What the heck are you talking about? Nazi Germany was totally right wing reactionary politics. It was Tea Party on steroids (well, maybe baby aspirin).

Go back to your Political Science 101 and this time, read your books!!

You're wrong. Go back to junior high civics and read YOUR BOOKS. What party were the Nazis?

"Under the leadership of Adolf Hitler (1889-1945), the National Socialist German Workers’ Party, or Nazi Party, grew into a mass movement and ruled Germany through totalitarian means from 1933 to 1945."
Nazi Party - World War II - HISTORY.com

Originally Posted by Guest

You have no idea what you're talking about and simply refer to the classical liberalized "Left/Right" view of totalitarian regimes. Prior to 1939, Adolph and Uncle Joe Stalin were best buddies which I always found ironic.


The Tea Party is against concentrated government power and in favor of constitutional restraints. It advocates he POLAR opposites of Nazi, Commie or Crazy (eg Venezuela, Syria, Obama, etc ) regimes. You should know that by now.

Stop reading "Think Progress" and other liberal rags and try to educate yourself before it's too late ... which is probably already is for you.

I bet if you liberals were half as smart as you believed, you would end up converting to conservatives. This is why conservatives look at liberals like they are the ignorant fools they prove themselves to be. You think you can make up for ignorance by being derisive. You only fool the young.

Originally Posted by Guest

Well, it seems as though the American public has had enough of several Regressives such as Graham, Bush, and Santorum. Very low numbers but these guys are continuing to stay in the race - to keep drawing money out of their PACS (?).

True, it is a long way until the convention but Americans have bailed on these jokers.

Trump has succeeded in splitting the Regressive Party and is handing the White House over to Democrats - AGAIN! Was that the plan all along? Hmmmm?

Very un original party BS. How credible could much of anything be coming from the party that is sponsoring, supporting, paying for an unethical, untrustworthy loser.

Originally Posted by Guest

You have no idea what you're talking about and simply refer to the classical liberalized "Left/Right" view of totalitarian regimes. Prior to 1939, Adolph and Uncle Joe Stalin were best buddies which I always found ironic.


The Tea Party is against concentrated government power and in favor of constitutional restraints. It advocates he POLAR opposites of Nazi, Commie or Crazy (eg Venezuela, Syria, Obama, etc ) regimes. You should know that by now.

Stop reading "Think Progress" and other liberal rags and try to educate yourself before it's too late ... which is probably already is for you.

There is just no excuse for ignorance with the availability of the Internet. I believe that is one liberal that won't be responding real fast.