View Full Version : The dummy does it again
Guest
08-29-2011, 05:52 AM
http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0811/62217.html
Please people, come up with someone I can vote for. I don't know which is the dumbest, Michelle or Rick.
Guest
08-29-2011, 06:26 AM
He is not all that bad:
http://www.powerlineblog.com/archives/2011/08/truth-telling-on-the-campaign-trail.php
Guest
08-29-2011, 07:25 AM
Bachmann is using tactics from the FREAKING MIDDLE AGES (and before). Use "God" to support your platform no matter WHAT happens.. Heck, maybe JUPITER and POSEIDON are mad that we've turned away from 'The Old Ways'! It's just as provable as Bachmann's claim.
Guest
08-29-2011, 08:10 AM
Plong,
Don't worry about voting for Bachmann or Perry. The mainstream Republicans are not dumb enough to put up reactionaries like either of them for President or VP. They learned their lesson with Palin in 2008. A couple of sensible candidates will probably emerge - and if not - the country will elect President Obama again.
Guest
08-29-2011, 08:39 AM
One of the wonderful things about living in this country is the fact that you don't have to believe as everyone else believes. Even in matters of faith. You can resort to childish name calling when our politicians give our Creator praise or acknowledge His hand in the guidance of our country.
I will be the first to defend your right to say these things, even if I don't agree, so long as you don't try to force your beliefs down the throats of others without going through the rule of law. I will also be the first to point out your hypocrisy.
Do you think President Obama is, in your words, a "dummy" for his words in his Presidential Proclamation--Thanksgiving Day November 23, 2010? In it, he offers thanks to God for the many blessing He has bestowed upon this great country from its inception until today, and asks that God continue to bless our nation.
Obama said, in part, "In confronting the challenges of our day, we must draw strength from the resolve of previous generations who faced their own struggles and take comfort in knowing a brighter day has always dawned on our great land. As we stand at the close of one year and look to the promise of the next, we lift up our hearts in gratitude to God for our many blessings, for one another, and for our Nation."
Now, using the same litmus test you use on Bachman and Perry, is Obama a dummy?
http://www.whitehouse.gov/the-press-office/2010/11/23/presidential-proclamation-thanksgiving-day
Guest
08-29-2011, 09:57 AM
One of the wonderful things about living in this country is the fact that you don't have to believe as everyone else believes. Even in matters of faith. You can resort to childish name calling when our politicians give our Creator praise or acknowledge His hand in the guidance of our country.
I will be the first to defend your right to say these things, even if I don't agree, so long as you don't try to force your beliefs down the throats of others without going through the rule of law. I will also be the first to point out your hypocrisy.
Do you think President Obama is, in your words, a "dummy" for his words in his Presidential Proclamation--Thanksgiving Day November 23, 2010? In it, he offers thanks to God for the many blessing He has bestowed upon this great country from its inception until today, and asks that God continue to bless our nation.
Obama said, in part, "In confronting the challenges of our day, we must draw strength from the resolve of previous generations who faced their own struggles and take comfort in knowing a brighter day has always dawned on our great land. As we stand at the close of one year and look to the promise of the next, we lift up our hearts in gratitude to God for our many blessings, for one another, and for our Nation."
Now, using the same litmus test you use on Bachman and Perry, is Obama a dummy?
http://www.whitehouse.gov/the-press-office/2010/11/23/presidential-proclamation-thanksgiving-day
Big difference between those statements and backman stating that GOD has now given two warning to Washington, the earthquake and the hurricane. That just show me what a lunatic she is.
GOD is a good thing, but if you hear it speak and give you guidance, then you are a lunitic.
Guest
08-29-2011, 10:05 AM
Big difference between those statements and backman stating that GOD has now given two warning to Washington, the earthquake and the hurricane. That just show me what a lunatic she is.
GOD is a good thing, but if you hear it speak and give you guidance, then you are a lunitic.
People have been trying to decipher God's meaning and purpose since the beginning of recorded history. I grew up devout Roman Catholic and my priests and teachers have always speculated on God's role in our world. I was told my whole youth that the U.S. was destined to win the two world wars because "ours was a righteous cause" and "God was on our side". Should I now consider all those religious men "lunatics", as you say?
Guest
08-29-2011, 10:13 AM
People have been trying to decipher God's meaning and purpose since the beginning of recorded history. I grew up devout Roman Catholic and my priests and teachers have always speculated on God's role in our world. I was told my whole youth that the U.S. was destined to win the two world wars because "ours was a righteous cause" and "God was on our side". Should I now consider all those religious men "lunatics", as you say?
You absolutely should. I cant say here how I feel about Catholic priests. They knew they were just putting lies in the simple minds of the common man. They knew that we won because we had superior weapons and manpower. Please tell me you don't believe GOD moves solders around the battlefield like a chess game. That mentality was good for the old testament, but has been changed by the NEW one. The New Testament teaches love and kindness, but so many interpret it in ways that approves hate and condemnation. Oh well, what are ya gunna do?
Guest
08-29-2011, 10:20 AM
Plong,
Don't worry about voting for Bachmann or Perry. The mainstream Republicans are not dumb enough to put up reactionaries like either of them for President or VP. They learned their lesson with Palin in 2008. A couple of sensible candidates will probably emerge - and if not - the country will elect President Obama again.
They called Reagan all kinds of hateful things that you left-wing liberals are now spewing today. What's the matter, you guys frightened again because B Hussein Obama is the weakest President in history?
Guest
08-29-2011, 10:33 AM
Big difference between those statements and backman stating that GOD has now given two warning to Washington, the earthquake and the hurricane. That just show me what a lunatic she is.
Bachmann's handlers are now saying her references about warnings from God were a joke. To me, that is even worse than if she had actually meant it .. you just don't joke about natural disasters that are causing injury and severe hardships to a large number of people.
Guest
08-29-2011, 10:35 AM
Bachmann's handlers are now saying her references about warnings from God were a joke. To me, that is even worse than if she had actually meant it .. you just don't joke about natural disasters that are causing injury and severe hardships to a large number of people.
Seems alot of people don't remember all the joking and hateful things that were said after Katrina.:cus:
Guest
08-29-2011, 10:37 AM
Bachmann's handlers are now saying her references about warnings from God were a joke. To me, that is even worse than if she had actually meant it .. you just don't joke about natural disasters that are causing injury and severe hardships to a large number of people.
:bigbow::bigbow::bigbow::bigbow:
People died from Irene. My God does not kill people to get the attention of politicians in Washington D.C.
Guest
08-29-2011, 10:58 AM
I guess the self-proclaimed "wise and erudite" here would call Lincoln a "dummy" too.
"In his Second Inaugural Address, which would be his final address to the American people, Lincoln endowed the Civil War with sacred meaning, creating an American Scripture and articulating an American civil religion that still suffuses the idea of the nation with religious significance.
"Fondly do we hope -- fervently do we pray -- that this mighty scourge of war may speedily pass away. Yet, if God wills that it continue, until all the wealth piled by the bond-man's 250 years of unrequited toil shall be sunk, ... as was said 3,000 years ago, so still it must be said 'the judgments of the Lord are true and righteous altogether.'"
http://www.pbs.org/godinamerica/people/abraham-lincoln.html
Guest
08-29-2011, 11:12 AM
As I am not a particularly religious person, it still makes me wince when I see people putting down other people's faith. Seems that there is a war on Christianity where some faiths gets a free ride. I want to make it clear that I do not in any way condone the harsh things said about any religion.
There is tons of literature to back my belief that there is a war on Christianity.(Banning the display of ten commandments, crosses, prayer in school,even Christmas, to name a few)
Guest
08-29-2011, 01:00 PM
They called Reagan all kinds of hateful things that you left-wing liberals are now spewing today. What's the matter, you guys frightened again because B Hussein Obama is the weakest President in history?
Just got to use that middle name!!!!!
Guest
08-29-2011, 01:03 PM
Just got to use that middle name!!!!!
I have a feeling he is proud of his middle name; don't you?
Guest
08-29-2011, 01:05 PM
You absolutely should. I cant say here how I feel about Catholic priests. They knew they were just putting lies in the simple minds of the common man. They knew that we won because we had superior weapons and manpower. Please tell me you don't believe GOD moves solders around the battlefield like a chess game. That mentality was good for the old testament, but has been changed by the NEW one. The New Testament teaches love and kindness, but so many interpret it in ways that approves hate and condemnation. Oh well, what are ya gunna do?
So now you're insulting my religion, and the priests who mentored me. Very nice.
Guest
08-29-2011, 01:14 PM
Anyone who thinks God has chosen the USA as his favorite place is mistaken.
Guest
08-29-2011, 01:18 PM
[QUOTE=cologal;387857]Just got to use that middle name!!!````
Obama insisted on being sweared in as the President of the United States as Barack Hussein Obama. If there is a problem with that name I must insist that you contact his office.
Guest
08-29-2011, 01:21 PM
Anyone who thinks God has chosen the USA as his favorite place is mistaken.
Can you give me some links or proof of your statement? Can anybody prove it one way or the other? I don't think so.
Guest
08-29-2011, 01:24 PM
So now you're insulting my religion, and the priests who mentored me. Very nice.
I did not mean it to be an insult. You misunderstood me. I just stated an opinion about what you said they said about the big wars. You may have misunderstood what they were trying to tell you all them years ago or just don't remember it correctly. No insult given and none should be perceived. My point is and was that when politicians use natural disasters as gods wrath in the way M Bachmann did is either lunacy or satanic. Sorry if you disagree RL but the woman is a basket case. We need to work together and try to get a candidate that CAN WIN and that could HELP AMERICA. Bachmann is not it.
Guest
08-29-2011, 01:29 PM
I did not mean it to be an insult. You misunderstood me. I just stated an opinion about what you said they said about the big wars. You may have misunderstood what they were trying to tell you all them years ago or just don't remember it correctly. No insult given and none should be perceived. My point is and was that when politicians use natural disasters as gods wrath in the way M Bachmann did is either lunacy or satanic. Sorry if you disagree RL but the woman is a basket case. We need to work together and try to get a candidate that CAN WIN and that could HELP AMERICA. Bachmann is not it.
I do not think that this kind of name-calling is detrimental to civil discussion. Would it be allright for me to call Obama, satanic or a lunatic? He may be anti-American but he knows what he is doing.
Guest
08-29-2011, 01:36 PM
I do not think that this kind of name-calling is detrimental to civil discussion. Would it be allright for me to call Obama, satanic or a lunatic? He may be anti-American but he knows what he is doing.
What?
Guest
08-29-2011, 01:51 PM
What?
I said civil discourse does not involve calling people names like lunatic or satanic.
Guest
08-29-2011, 02:15 PM
I did not mean it to be an insult. You misunderstood me. I just stated an opinion about what you said they said about the big wars. You may have misunderstood what they were trying to tell you all them years ago or just don't remember it correctly. No insult given and none should be perceived. My point is and was that when politicians use natural disasters as gods wrath in the way M Bachmann did is either lunacy or satanic. Sorry if you disagree RL but the woman is a basket case. We need to work together and try to get a candidate that CAN WIN and that could HELP AMERICA. Bachmann is not it.
Whatever you may think of Michelle Bachmann, she is a far better candidate for the Presidency that the current President. She's not my first choice, but will get my vote if it's her against Obama.
It's not even a contest in my mind.
Guest
08-29-2011, 02:48 PM
First I do think and was taught in school that God is a hands-off person hence we have free choice. God favors no one over another. As for Bachman being a better President than Obama is I beg to disagree and the votes will bear me out. She is far too radical for most American voters and says things that are just far out. $2.00 for gas?
Guest
08-29-2011, 02:55 PM
Whatever you may think of Michelle Bachmann, she is a far better candidate for the Presidency that the current President. She's not my first choice, but will get my vote if it's her against Obama.
It's not even a contest in my mind.
OMG! You're kidding, right ??? The GOP might as well start preparing for 2016, if she'll be the choice in 2012...
Just saying.... She's certainly not my cup of tea :icon_wink:
Guest
08-29-2011, 03:04 PM
Whatever you may think of Michelle Bachmann, she is a far better candidate for the Presidency that the current President. She's not my first choice, but will get my vote if it's her against Obama.
It's not even a contest in my mind.
Hummm. Richie, I might just stay home if its between them two. I just hope for one of the many qualified members of the GOP to step up and soon. I think a republican would do a better job with the economy; however, I fear if we go so far to the right with Bachmann or Perry we will end up with other social problems worse than the recession because of their non inclusive views. Rather I like it or not, we have every kind of nut in the tool chest in America and they will be like oil and water to anyone slightly different from their hard right beliefs. As long as we are a moderate country, we need moderate leaders.
Guest
08-29-2011, 03:42 PM
Whatever you may think of Michelle Bachmann, she is a far better candidate for the Presidency that the current President. She's not my first choice, but will get my vote if it's her against Obama.
It's not even a contest in my mind.
Of course she would do a better job then B.Hussein Obama. Forrest Gump would be my vote if it was between him and B. Hussein.
Guest
08-29-2011, 03:55 PM
Plong,
Don't worry about voting for Bachmann or Perry. The mainstream Republicans are not dumb enough to put up reactionaries like either of them for President or VP. They learned their lesson with Palin in 2008. A couple of sensible candidates will probably emerge - and if not - the country will elect President Obama again.
Do you mean to imply that Obama is main stream? Given his past associations Ayers, Wright, et al. I am just saying......
I am not very religious but I do believe that the day America bars "God" from our way of life we are heading for our destruction. As for religion when balancing good vs bad religion tips on the side of good much more prominently. Keep in mind every institution has had bad actors, schools, muncipalities, military, law enforcement , etc. We shouldn't judge them all by the acts of a few. We should however demand that those few be dealt with severely for their breach of trust
Guest
08-29-2011, 03:57 PM
Maybe you guys have convinced me.... $2.00 gas sounds pretty good.
Guest
08-29-2011, 04:49 PM
They called Reagan all kinds of hateful things that you left-wing liberals are now spewing today. What's the matter, you guys frightened again because B Hussein Obama is the weakest President in history?
Yup. That's me. The left-wing liberal who voted for Reagan TWICE (four times if you include the NH primaries - he was the first Presidential candidate I ever voted for when I came of age) and voted for Libertarians Harry Browne and Ron Paul.
For the humor-impaired, that's sarcasm.
Guest
08-29-2011, 05:03 PM
Rubicon,
I said that Bachmann and Perry are not mainstream Republicans. I said that mainstream Republicans will hopefully find more middle of the road candidates than either Bachmann or Perry. American voters will not vote extremist candidates into office for President or VP. This was shown by voters rejecting Palin in 2008. No, I do not believe, nor do the American voters, believe that President Obama is an extremist. Yes, I do expect some remarks from a few posters on this forum regarding that - but what else could one expect from those few?
Guest
08-29-2011, 06:46 PM
Looks like us Floridians might be standing in the way of progress on the energy front. I don't understand why we should object to drilling in the everglades or off the coast of Florida.
How else will we get our $2.00 gas prices...
http://www.orlandosentinel.com/news/politics/fl-bachmann-everglades-oil-drill-20110829,0,1032513.story
I don't get it . . .
Guest
08-29-2011, 06:54 PM
Bachmann's handlers are now saying her references about warnings from God were a joke. To me, that is even worse than if she had actually meant it .. you just don't joke about natural disasters that are causing injury and severe hardships to a large number of people.
:agree:
Guest
08-29-2011, 07:02 PM
Yup. That's me. The left-wing liberal who voted for Reagan TWICE (four times if you include the NH primaries - he was the first Presidential candidate I ever voted for when I came of age) and voted for Libertarians Harry Browne and Ron Paul.
For the humor-impaired, that's sarcasm.
I am sorry that life has sent you down the wrong path, but it is not nice to make fun of people. Your humor is impaired.
Guest
08-29-2011, 08:57 PM
After seeing this clip on television tonight, it is abundantly clear she said it in jest.......the audience's reaction tells it as well.
Once again, a few written quotes out of context made a feeding frenzy by the leftist crowd that hates Bachmann.
See:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XiulmCotAcA
Guest
08-29-2011, 09:39 PM
After seeing this clip on television tonight, it is abundantly clear she said it in jest.......the audience's reaction tells it as well.
Once again, a few written quotes out of context made a feeding frenzy by the leftist crowd that hates Bachmann.
See:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XiulmCotAcA
Thank you.
Guest
08-29-2011, 09:52 PM
Of course, Bachmann meant her ill-fated remark to be a joke. It was in very poor taste and never should have been said - but it was a joke.
Guest
08-29-2011, 10:55 PM
Michelle Bachmann?; right now I'd vote for Charlie Sheen over Barack Obama? Who are we kidding here?
Guest
08-29-2011, 11:31 PM
Michelle Bachmann?; right now I'd vote for Charlie Sheen over Barack Obama? Who are we kidding here?
Yes, Charlie Sheen would be a significant improvement over B. Hussein Obama.:laugh:
Guest
08-30-2011, 12:11 AM
http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0811/62217.html
Please people, come up with someone I can vote for. I don't know which is the dumbest, Michelle or Rick.
I think she was making a joke. You somehow missed that. You don't like who's running for president. If everybody thinks like you I'm concerned about who is voting.
Guest
08-30-2011, 08:28 AM
I think she was making a joke. You somehow missed that. You don't like who's running for president. If everybody thinks like you I'm concerned about who is voting.
Pay attention to the polls. B. Hussein Obama is losing the black voters. 96% of blacks voted for him in 2008. The numbers are in the mid 80's now.
Guest
08-30-2011, 11:19 AM
I have a feeling he is proud of his middle name; don't you?
I don't hear him using it....the previous president was GW or George or W but I don't know what the middle name was.
Why would it be used.....cause its Muslim? I suspect if it was Harry we wouldn't know about it.
Seedy at best.
Guest
08-30-2011, 11:22 AM
Cologal,
The W stood for "Weasel".
Guest
08-30-2011, 11:28 AM
Cologal,
The W stood for "Weasel".
Staying near the bottom. Good for you.
__________________________________________________ __________________________
By the way Cologal; I think most people know George W. Bush's middle name is Walker. This President's middle name IS Hussein, and it IS Muslim. Are you ashamed of it? Is the President? Methinks thou protests too much.
Guest
08-30-2011, 11:49 AM
I thought it stood for WIN.
You know.
A WIN over Gore.
A WIN over Kerry.:crap2:
Guest
08-30-2011, 11:58 AM
I thought it stood for WIN.
You know.
A WIN over Gore.
A WIN over Kerry.:crap2:
More like a steal from Gore. :cus:
Guest
08-30-2011, 12:02 PM
More like a steal from Gore. :cus:
Yea, the WIN over Gore sent Gore over the deep end from which he never recovered. Lucky thing for America that Gore lost because he could not handle adversity. :sing:
Guest
08-30-2011, 12:07 PM
Walker and Herbert, the name of George W. Bush's father, George Herbert Walker Bush, are names of ancestors. The names can be traced back to both maternal and paternal ancestors in America. I don't see anything funny or odd about honoring family when naming children.
Barack Hussein Obama II is named after his African father, who was a Kenyan native and, at the time of Obama's birth, his father was a citizen of the United Kingdom and Colonies. (Kenya formally gained its independence from the United Kingdom two years after Obama's birth.)
Hussein Onyango Obama was Obama's grandfather.
Like the Bush family, Obama's parents carried on a tradition of honoring relatives by giving children their names. I don't see why it is seen as offensive when someone uses a middle name. Especially when it shows a sort of family tree and geneology.
Guest
08-30-2011, 12:35 PM
Cologal,
The W stood for "Weasel".
This is the one reliable kind of response ! And then clutter the board complaining about remarks that pertain to someone you like ! WOW
Guest
08-30-2011, 01:45 PM
As I have said here several times, all Presidents who have a middle name have used them in their oath of office. The only reason that a couple of posters here keep referring to President Obama's full name is to try and get under our skin. They think we will cry racism and then those few posters will criticize by calling us haters. It is just a vicious circle. Do not fall for their goading techniques.
Guest
08-30-2011, 02:16 PM
As I have said here several times, all Presidents who have a middle name have used them in their oath of office. The only reason that a couple of posters here keep referring to President Obama's full name is to try and get under our skin. They think we will cry racism and then those few posters will criticize by calling us haters. It is just a vicious circle. Do not fall for their goading techniques.
And the reason for the degrading remark about our last President is what ? It has what to do with what ?
Your opinion on ".......only reason that a couple of posters here keep referring to President Obama's full name is to try and get under our skin."
is your opinion and you alone.
If you check the archives of this forum, and other political forums you will see the last President refered to as George Walker Bush many times..as well as William Jefferson Clinton. Lyndon Baines Johnson was well known by his middle name.....George Herbert Walker Bush was known by the name in many circles....James Earl Carter was another....Ronald Regan did not use nor was he known in many circles with his middle name (Wilson)....of course Richard Milhous Nixon was known under that name quite openly.
There is a sensitivity, discussed during the campaign to his middle name. It seems to bring out lots of emotion for some reason (wonder why) It IS his name and despite your "opinion" can be used without "trying to get under your skin" !
Guest
08-30-2011, 02:57 PM
And the reason for the degrading remark about our last President is what ? It has what to do with what ?
Your opinion on ".......only reason that a couple of posters here keep referring to President Obama's full name is to try and get under our skin."
is your opinion and you alone.
If you check the archives of this forum, and other political forums you will see the last President refered to as George Walker Bush many times..as well as William Jefferson Clinton. Lyndon Baines Johnson was well known by his middle name.....George Herbert Walker Bush was known by the name in many circles....James Earl Carter was another....Ronald Regan did not use nor was he known in many circles with his middle name (Wilson)....of course Richard Milhous Nixon was known under that name quite openly.
There is a sensitivity, discussed during the campaign to his middle name. It seems to bring out lots of emotion for some reason (wonder why) It IS his name and despite your "opinion" can be used without "trying to get under your skin" !
G. Walker Bush
G. Herbert Walker Bush
R. Milhous Nixon
J. Earl Carter
L. Baines Johnson
B. Hussein Obama
How many of these have you seen on the board? I've been here since the beginning and have only seen one. Spin that one.
Guest
08-30-2011, 03:08 PM
Iaudit is 100% right in his posting.
Guest
08-30-2011, 03:16 PM
G. Walker Bush
G. Herbert Walker Bush
R. Milhous Nixon
J. Earl Carter
L. Baines Johnson
B. Hussein Obama
How many of these have you seen on the board? I've been here since the beginning and have only seen one. Spin that one.
This post makes absolutely no sense whatsoever !
Spin this one ? My post clearly states this forum AND OTHERS.....guess as someone said, ubers dont read it all, but mainly this is such an inane conversation.....with all that is going on in this country and the world, character assassination is not woth the effort. You guys enjoy the playground games of calling names...I am more concerned with the world and the country and discussing that.....amazing that this post was even made.....makes no sense.
Keep defending the middle name of the President...do not allow its use. that is vital to the world...and vital to be discussed. VERY IMPORTANT to discuss that so I will step out of your way ! WOW is all I can say.
Guest
08-30-2011, 03:17 PM
You folks should have the same passion for the issues that confront us...that would be nice
Guest
08-30-2011, 03:31 PM
This thread keeps me laughing. I like it.
Guest
08-30-2011, 03:35 PM
http://www.bostonherald.com/news/regional/view.bg?articleid=1362374
Now they catch B Hussein's uncle, Obama Onyango, an illegal alien with drunken drive. Obama's Aunt was caught last year living the good life with taxpayer's money.
Guest
08-30-2011, 04:01 PM
As I have said here several times, all Presidents who have a middle name have used them in their oath of office. The only reason that a couple of posters here keep referring to President Obama's full name is to try and get under our skin. They think we will cry racism and then those few posters will criticize by calling us haters. It is just a vicious circle. Do not fall for their goading techniques.
1-Racism? I thought that his mother was white, plus he was raised by his white grandparents...
2-Barry Soetoro, Barak Obama, Barak Hussein Obama,...Looks like this guy uses the name that he thinks best suits his needs at the time. Could it be that he let the "Hussein" cat out of the bag with a purpose that best suited his needs?
Guest
08-30-2011, 05:43 PM
1-Racism? I thought that his mother was white, plus he was raised by his white grandparents...
2-Barry Soetoro, Barak Obama, Barak Hussein Obama,...Looks like this guy uses the name that he thinks best suits his needs at the time. Could it be that he let the "Hussein" cat out of the bag with a purpose that best suited his needs?
Yes. For occasions such as this:
"The Obama administration is set to begin formal contacts with the Muslim Brotherhood, a group dedicated in its own words to “eliminating and destroying Western civilization from within, and sabotaging its miserable house.”
This news came in a Reuters report Wednesday, quoting a “senior U.S. official, who spoke on condition of anonymity.”
Why this official felt it necessary to speak on condition of anonymity is a mystery, given the fact that Barack Obama has never made a secret of his solicitude for the Muslim Brotherhood. Even though the Brotherhood was still outlawed in Egypt at that time, he made a point of inviting leaders of the group to attend his speech to the Islamic world in Cairo on June 4, 2009.
Not only that. Obama included the leader of a Muslim Brotherhood-linked group that had been named an unindicted co-conspirator in a Hamas terror funding case among the clerics giving a prayer during his inauguration ceremonies: Ingrid Mattson, then-president of the Islamic Society of North America (ISNA), offered this prayer at the National Cathedral on Obama’s Inauguration Day – despite the fact that ISNA has admitted its ties to the Brotherhood. In fact, so overwhelming is the evidence of ISNA’s involvement with the Brotherhood and Hamas that the previous summer, federal prosecutors had rejected a request from ISNA to remove its unindicted co-conspirator status. Obama even sent his Senior Adviser Valerie Jarrett to be the keynote speaker at ISNA’s national convention in 2009......"
http://frontpagemag.com/2011/07/04/obama-reaches-out-to-the-muslim-brotherhood/
Guest
08-31-2011, 02:26 AM
bye
Guest
08-31-2011, 10:14 AM
Does anyone have any idea what this post was originally about?:sad:
Sure; it was a childish question about who was the dumber between 2 Republican candidates for president. As that silly question couldn't generate much thoughtful repartee, the discussion naturally shifted to other more interesting points of discussion; much like what happens at your kitchen table or the corner table at the local bar.
Guest
08-31-2011, 10:42 AM
Sure; it was a childish question about who was the dumber between 2 Republican candidates for president. As that silly question couldn't generate much thoughtful repartee, the discussion naturally shifted to other more interesting points of discussion; much like what happens at your kitchen table or the corner table at the local bar.
But any question can cause you to throw insults. You should be ashamed of what you post on this web site.
You are now blocked from me seeing anything you say just at Admin recommended. Good riddance
Guest
08-31-2011, 11:57 AM
But any question can cause you to throw insults. You should be ashamed of what you post on this web site.
You are now blocked from me seeing anything you say just at Admin recommended. Good riddance
Richie is one of the best posters here and he was right about this silly title to this thread. How are we to have serious discussions when it starts off on the wrong foot with a title? OK. You going to block me too?
Guest
08-31-2011, 11:58 AM
Does anyone have any idea what this post was originally about?:sad:
"The dummy does it again"
Guest
08-31-2011, 12:03 PM
"The dummy does it again"
Good bye
Guest
08-31-2011, 12:05 PM
You asked, I told you. This is your thread. That was your title. Please do not get mad at me.
Guest
08-31-2011, 02:40 PM
I responded in another thread before I saw this one. Villager II is enraged because I classified his question of "Which of these 2 candidates is dumber?" as childish. This is a non-forgivable insult? OK; whatever.
vBulletin® v3.8.11, Copyright ©2000-2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.